No.7761
>>7760Definitely soystory purposes by now
No.7762
>>7761It felt like yesterday when we would say
>Xhe is bvilt for *WC No.7763
>>7762you need to say "reserved", like in
>>>/zellig/128123 No.7764
>are those racebait shitposts from 2 years ago kept up purely for historical purposes
It's because the effort for the historical revisionism needed is too big. This place used to tolerate jokes.
No.7766
>>7764Zoot denounced this stuff back in April 2024
>>>/chive/958 . racebait was posted nearly exclusively by nuShartycucks who invaded this site, it was rightfully condemned in the early days and should never be tolerated in the future. one of my fears is that the new admins will be tricked by history revisionists like you into believing this deplorable behavior is "site culture".
No.7767
>>7764We all remember those jokes but the people that it attracts is definitely one bad side of it, I mean the whole reason it got restricted is because foodists were organizing to spam BBC bait here (this actually happened)
Also
>BBC IS SITE CULTURE NUFAG