/q/ - The Zarty

'oxx and 'ape zvte and nvke his house.

>That post was met with resistance even when it was originally posted, it was regarded as bait/goonbait/etc.
no it wasn't, people were polite. the only poster that MIGHT'VE been complaining about the image was >>>/zellig/6733 and he wasn't even complaining about OP's image specifically, he was just informing him that NSFW/lewd art wasn't allowed.
>For which purpose? Archiving? Are we archiving goonslop now?
that image follows Zarty's rules and the Zooru uses the Zarty's rules. if you think goonslop is being allowed, blame it on the Zarty.

>>5424
And here's Zute again, your shitty gooner argument is NEVER going to fly

>That post was met with resistance even when it was originally posted, it was regarded as bait/goonbait/etc
Just blatantly false you dishonest shmuck. How do you lie like a jew with no shame at all?

>>5425
i'm not Zute

>2 months to fix a booru which multiple people use
If you are talking about the 'ru being down for a time, Zute could not do anything, even if he wanted to. There was a bit of a problem with the host.

>/co/cuck
who?

>but that post is still heckin' there
which post?

>>5429
read the booru thread(Second head is gone)

>>5430
Oh my shlopers, why? Why make drama out of this image? Back then nobody had a problem with it (people were more intrigued by the question of whether or not the thread was bait; shows you how worse things have become) and I did not find it sexually arousing. It doesn't have a camel toe, it doesn't have nipples and at that point i had decided that if an image isnt worse (when it comes to showing skin) then the pic on this post (made by le massa himself) it can stay (since in the very early days, we did have a small problem at deciding where the line should be crossed).
A pervert would find anything sexually arousing, even a nun in full clothing. At that point, God and his Church can help you, not me.


Another thing, my mods told me that nobody reported the post on the 'ru (instead, the drama was started by two/three individuals). On the zarty, nothing (at least not until after the drama had moved on to the zarty). If you didnt know, on the zarty the arrow before the name of the poster can be clicked and it shows a "report" option. I am not sure how it is on the zooru, but i dont imagine it to be that hard to figure. Atleast report the thread/post before making a fuss about it.

This situation is getting pretty close to >>3084 and this is pretty much drama that should have stayed on the ru, not the zarty. I am very close to start chopping some heads off.

>>5434
This image is different from the one that Zute "has been allowing on the zooru out of spite", it's clearly two different contexts. But what about Zute checking IPs and stalking people like the soymy poster because he was seething? Why is Kate on the zooru? Why is the /co/cuck still on the zooru? Why even ADD the tag "goonbait" to literal goonbait (you know the entire reason the booru was made was not to be like Foenkie's)(Third head is gone)

What's going on? Why is every one angry?

>>5443
>self inserting as the leaky chudcel
It's over for you

>>5444
So what's the drama? About gooning or something?

>>5445
One side is arguing that the image which was left up by zute was sexualizing the sisters too much (which i agree with) and zute's side says that it's not as bad as they're making it up to be (i think?)

>>5446
Who the hell is Zute? Is he Zoot's evil twin or something?

>>5446
I can see how regular people would find it hard to detect which images consitutes as "too much" but as an artist myself i find the image in discussion as a bit too much from analyzing how the image is structured.
>>5447
Owner of the zooru

The image is inconsequential, removing it would just mean more censorship

>>5449
>MUHHHHHH CENSORSHIP
But the image of the Mymy feet gets deleted, yeah sure

>>5448
A different guy owns it?

Refer to this

>>5450
Yeah I think that's also gay and retarded
>>5452
>shitposting is bad
'toss missed hard with this one

>>5450
What's wrong with a bit of feet?

>>5454
>>85386
samefag. Now i know what your intentions are.

>>5422
This

>>5442
>This image is different from the one that Zute bla bla bla

The image that i posted is connected to this part of the post:
>at that point i had decided that if an image isnt worse (when it comes to showing skin) then the pic on this post (made by le massa himself)…
The pic that Zute wont remove is not worse when it comes to nudity. Again, literally nobody even was concerned with the pic and I dont find it sexually arousing.

>has been allowing on the zooru out of spite
TBF this is all a nothingburger. Zute has his reasons. I agree with his statements on the 'ru. The three individuals who started this should take some meds. If they find that badly drawn image lust provoking, they should consider going outside for a bit.

It is bad, but not that bad. Nobody reported it for a good year or so. Nobody did back then. Nobody cares. Lets move on.

<Stuff not related to the drama a.k.a. lets bring more drama because why naw
>Zute checking IPs and stalking people like the soymy poster because he was seething
I have no clue what this particular drama is about

>Why is Kate on the zooru
I dont know. I never cared about Kate. Ask Zute about it. Personally i didnt see an account named "Kate" on that post (only Zute referring to an individual using that name)

> /co/cuck
still cannot recall who that is

>Why even ADD the tag "goonbait" to literal goonbait
Idk, dont ask me. From what i can see, from the 23 posts, half of them arent even seriouse/"goonbait". Contact zute at zute@cock.li

>you know the entire reason the booru was made was not to be like Foenkie's
For the most part, the few times i visited the Zooru i had no complaints. I didnt see straight up porn (biggest crap that annoyed me from Foenkie's ru), except that one time there was a BBC raid (the posts were deleted). I was the wrong man at the wrong time.



Please, lets move on or again, i will start chopping off heads (three in particular). Things should NOT have escalated to this and I have no intentions of continuing. We all have better things to do.

>>5459
I knvvl

Hi guys Zoot here, I'll ban people when they rightfully complain about problems which I am not aware of because I check the website once a month, I give mod to someone who obsessively checks IPs and am not aware the guy who is running the Zooru has been hosting gay smut fiction between me and Zute, and stated that he is not deleting posts from the /co/pedo (which somehow I manage to ignore the existence of even after he has posted 'p on the website) because it's too hard, anyways heads will soy yadda yadda

>>5459
>Personally i didnt see an account named "Kate" on that post
she's posting anonymously

>>5461
he really says this(First head is gone )

>>5461
jarvis gigaquote this