The Zarty

>YOU WILL LET PEOPLE ENJOY THINGS
>YOU WILL REPOST THE PEDO'S ARTWORK
>YOU WILL LISTEN TO MY WHATABOUTISM
>YOU WILL TURN INTO A 4CHANNER
>AND YOU WILL BE HAPPY

>>4825
It's allowed but no one posts it because there's not tranny pedophiles who self insert as 'lita, so there's no need to do anything. When it gets posted its usage is normal

>>4825
I saw a soylita thread on /qa/ here a few hours ago that got deleted doe

>>4827
It was the /co/pedo or some other shitskin probably

>>4825
Wrong answer. Only today a guy eas banned 4 times only because he posted soylita. And that's what MegaMymy was banned for too.

>>4825
well this isn't some random literal who artist making unrelated art, this is a guy who created something that was of great offense to the community and the outrage is justified

>>4822
Comparing real life family rape with shitty ms paint ragebait is retarded and you have to be delusional to even consider it analogous in that analogy (and he's not even saying you should enjoy the rest of his art, just that it shouldn't be completely banned)
>hur dur /co/ pedo argument
I'm one of the people who pioneered zellig puritanposting back on sharty's /qa/, I'm not defending grim (he's reprehensible) I'm just saying you sound like a faggot

>'P IS LITERALLY RAGEBAIT, IT'S A JOKE!

>>4831
I'm not saying it is real the same as genuine rape of course not, but in the case of the analogy he made my amendment makes it more comparable to how it actually is for us.

I have an idea for all the people who's clitties are leaking because they no longer can post their favourite pedo artist. Buy the zelligparty.soy domain, rent a server and make a splinter. Everyone will be happy, both you and us.

>>4835
No, it was an image of soylita with a binky

>>4834
Please do not ruin our image any further by doing this

>>4834
We do not need ANOTHER soysphere pedo splinter

>>4836
that image was obviously sexualized. it was deleted for that, not for being Soylita.

>>4832
Definitionally true, he made the art to get a rise out of people, doesn't change the fact that it's vile
>>4833
But it's still a moot point and makes you sound unhinged
<
Also apparently the messages of the guy who made the analogy are getting deleted so how's that for draconian censorship, not even allowed to argue anymore geg

>>4840
>the messages of the guy who made the analogy are getting deleted
he's clearly deleting them himself.

I don't think that guy even is zaryan at this point, I'm starting to think it is another falseflag after he self deleted those posts.

>>4841
Are you saying that as a janny or just guessing? Because I don't see why he'd keep making replies just to delete them

1984 or advanced mind games, call it

probably the same guy who reposted the "poorly" censored image in the first place

>>4844
If he's deleting them himself then that's some next level psyop tactics, fooled me

>>4843
well, we can get a confirmation of my intuition. Mods, is this true or not

There's no reason why anyone would defend Grim unless they were trying to coopt the thing and allowing pedos to roam free. Pedos are in fact bad and for anyone who's still attached to this dusty view of "let the unrulecucking do its work", it doesn't work, take a look at the jarty or the 'cucks. Same thing can be said for the extreme opposite, where extreme rulecucking kills the culture. Things change overtime, this is the first time Grim drew actual 'p and there's people who say
>Just ignore it
No fuck you nigger I am not going to do that, you guys are too complacent with these people being given a place to exist as long as we ignore them. These people should not be here in the first place, Grim made some fantastic artwork but he really overstepped this time, there's no excusing, there's no amount of convincing that could convince any self-respecting Zaryan of letting his stuff back here. Doing that means being fine with what he does. It's clear people are not fine with it, no one should be. Maybe in the future things will change again, but this is for now, the correct thing to do

>>4848
Dit, zoveel dit

>>4843
I do see a reason, there has been the /co/ pedo lurking us and he revealed himself obviously during and after the bob thread incident, since then he's been spamming porn of the zellig girls, this is another attempt of him to undermine us

>>4837
>>4838
I see no point in being forced to integrate with such people

>>4848
Fair point but I still think the reaction is literally 1984. From the banner to /v/, grims influence is plastered all over the site, especially old oc, and while most admiration has probably turned to disgust and feelings of betrayal (as it has for me) I don't think you can, or should, just erase his involvement with zellig.

>>4840
What was deleted? Post a screenshot

>>4842
>>4843
i only deleted two of my messages. i’m used to deleting stuff because this website is usually slow moving and i can resend the message before another reply comes. i’m sorry for being autistic.
>>4848
>this is the first time Grim drew actual 'p
no it isn’t. it was public knowledge that he had drawn Maya having sex with a child, and that didn’t stop people from continuing to enjoy his art. once again, this mindset that we have to disregard all his work is a new one.
>Doing that means being fine with what he does
do you think every fan of Roman Polanski’s films are okay with him raping teenagers?

>>4817
I'm here because I think Mymy is edgy and cool, not because she's my precious daughteru or something

>>4854
And for the same reason his thread got locked (even for lighter stuff like the Robin Barten drawing), now he's banned because he did it again and drew even worse stuff

>>4855
This. Agugu is literal delusion and we reap what we sow for not cutting off that cancerous growth in it's infancy (pun intended)

>>4851
We'd need to achieve a perfect balance between rules and freedom of posting. Zoot is willing to change rules and take feedback. Who knows what the fuck might happen in the other splinter, it could end up like the jarty or something worse.

>>4858
>entertaining a joke post
Nufallingforbaitcacas...

>>4852
There's nothing wrong about going full 1984 against pedo

>>4858
my take on freedom is that they are free to leave

>>4861
Reddit tier response, when did you join?

>>4862
>not letting people just enjoy things is reddit tier

>>4862
Give him time, he's still acclimatizing

>>4854
apologies for accusing you, it's just that he has been spamming porn and immediately archiving it, the soylita post of today was also his.

Lewis Carroll would be a better analogy than Roman Polanski

>>4866
literal who vs figurative someone

>>4864
i've never used /co/, how long does it take to acclimatize to being a pedo?

>>4854
>drawn Maya having sex with a child, and that didn’t stop people from continuing to enjoy his art
so people were less outraged by maya raping a kid? Whatever could cause this double standard (oh nonono, orwellbros are we shotafags???)

>>4868
Never if you're normal, instantaneously if your skin is the color of coal

>>4869
well there were no genitalia in the pic

>>4869
is maya having sex with a kid exaggarated heavily? the most i saw was a maya demon with hands coming out of it grabbing a kid

>>4872
no, there was an unambiguous one of her embracing him with her legs spread

>>4873
nigawat

>>4872
I don't remember exactly, but there was intercourse drawn.
Anyways, our values evolve over time we no longer tolerate this kind of behavior.