The Zarty

>>4763
>>4764
>>4765
>>4766
leaking

>>>4763 (You)
>>>4764 (You)
>>>4765 (You)
>>>4766 (You)
>leaking

>>4761
Any self respecting right winger supported east european decommunization and destruction of soviet statues, sometimes you just have to erase parts of history that are hostile to your ideas and future

>>4769
tsmt

>>4761
the analogy of historical statues makes no sense for your point, a statue in a public space means you celebrate his legacy, if that legacy is not worth celebrating anymore for whatever reason, the statue should be put in a museum, our museum is /chive/

>>4750
If we do not know the unbiased truth then we can continue to find it. Fake truths are what's taking down today's society, influenced by people's subjective opinions. These are not truths, these are lies that are spread around as a truth.
Humans are ignorant in most cases, but they don't actively seek out the actual truth but are being lead by fake ones, leading them to fight againsts others who are spreading their own fake truths.
Socrates says to be certain in your ignorance, don't try to hide the fact that you know nothing or make up fake truths to cover up the flaws in your ideology. We as a species need to continue learning and changing our perspective about things because if we dwell in those fake truths, it will ultimately cause discourse and havoc.
I'm refering to things with an objective truth, subjective topics are subjective, if we do not know the objective truth then we should admit as such instead of hiding from one's ignorance and continue to work on finding out that truth.

>>4772
but the thread WAS moved to /chive/

>>4772
it isn’t the best analogy i could’ve made, but i wanted to convey how ridiculous i think this situation is. the problem isn’t that they’re removing references him (i’d be fine with that), it’s that the mods have flat out banned the sharing of his art.
a better comparison would be to artists who are also bad people. should people not be allowed to discuss and share Roman Polanski’s films? he raped a teenager after all.
Grim had made and continues to make great drawings which people should be allowed to repost as much as they please.

>PLEEEEEEEASEEEEE DON'T BAN GRIM PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DON'T DO THAT, IT'S ART IS STILL SO GOOD
>EVENDOE THE ONLY ART HE'LL DRAW NOW WILL BE MORE AND MORE 'P
>PLEASE PLEASE PLE-ACKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!

>>4781
We shouldn't give even more fame to such disgusting subhuman, banning of his art was a good choice

>>4781
>yeah, we should totally lock and move his thread, but also allow everyone to repost his art everywhere else
look everyone, an idiot spotted

>>4781
Unironic mossad agent attempting to deplatform us by lobbying mods to allow pedophiles

>>4782
would you niggers please stop depicting 4cucks as hanging mymys?

>>4786
That's GRIMmymy nigga, use this if you wanna depict the average /co/fag
>

>>4785
Maybe it's one of the jannies rebelling against Grim ban and trying to change it by pretending to be an innocent little Zaryan. Zoot can we get early life check on jannies?

>YOU SHOULDN'T USE GRIMJAK BECAUSE IT HURTS MY FEE F-ACKKKK!!!

It's just SNCA at this point. Everyone who didn't join yesterday knows grim is an edgy degenerate (literally drew massa having sex with the beheaded sisters). He did cross a line with his latest piece of "ragebait" (though I still blame it on aguguniggers) but I don't think you can just erase all of his presence from the website like it's literally 1984
>>4788
>doesn't remember misha
jews have run this gay website since the beginning

>>4782
>>EVENDOE THE ONLY ART HE'LL DRAW NOW WILL BE MORE AND MORE 'P
he’s drawn that kind of stuff before, we’ve always ignored it and focused on the good stuff up until now. this mindset that we have to completely disregard him is a new one.
>>4783
Grim is just an anonymous guy on 4chan. he has no online profiles and no ways he could benefit from his work. banning or unbanning his art affects him in no way.
>>4784
i didn’t say i supported locking the thread. i said i was fine with people removing references to him on things such as banners and the Zarty’s PixelPlanet region.

>>4781
I think a reasonable compromise is the zooru. There the drawings he makes that aren't egregious are allowed to be posted there, since it is the case for other artists we don't appreciate and also the the zooru is more of an archive of images than anything. I don't think his drawings have a place on the zarty itself anymore like how we've barely reposted stuff from the other co artists. Yet I doubt the people who reposted his artwork are willing to to so now regardeless.

>'p is ongezellig culture newligster

>this entire thread

>>4792
Zooru shouldn't become an safehaven for pedo's art. Every Grimart should be destroyed or falsified, every post should be rewritten, every picture should be repainted, every thread and filename should be renamed, every date should be altered.

>>4795
This, so much this.

>>4795
also everything worth saving was saved already, tell me why anyone would need to repost grim's art right now

>>4795
>

>>4797
because he’s still making good art
also banning art not because of its content but because of the identity of the artist is ridiculous

>>4795
Too much work, but the reasonable compromise is to remove any new posts with his works, rework the coalie and one of the banners.

>>4799
>the good art in question
>'p rape of agugu

>>4799
>the agugu 'p is good art keep posting him

>>4801
>>4802
i’m talking about his new art that hasn’t been reposted here because of the new rule

>BRO COME ON JUST OVERLOOK THE 'P BRO
>IT'S NOT LIKE I TOTALLY GOON TO THIS TRANNY PEDOPHILE ART DUDE THIS IS LITERALLY RULECUCKING

>>4803
Ask the question, what value does sharing his art here bring, why would we want to see his artwork after what he did?

>>4804
>>IT'S NOT LIKE I TOTALLY GOON TO THIS TRANNY PEDOPHILE ART DUDE THIS IS LITERALLY RULECUCKING
no one is cooming to his art here. if they want to they go to Desuarchive and find all his uncensored art.
>>4805
people still enjoy Roman Polanski’s films.

>>4806
Going with your analogy, would you still enjoy polanski's films if it wasn't a random he raped but a close family member of yours, thats the type situation we are dealing with.

>>4806
>people enjoy films by a jewish pedo therefore we should allow artworks by a 4cuck pedo
Who the fuck is this "argument" supposed to convince?

>>4807
and further would appreciate it if your friends shared a film with you created by the guy who raped your sister suppose, I don't think so.

>>4807
>I have formed a family tier emotional attachment to these characters, no I am not delusional.

>>4808
it’s supposed to convince people who believe art can be separated from the artist.
agian, banning art not because of its content but because of the identity of the artist is ridiculous.

>>4811
Banning someone's art just because he is a pedo is a good and rightful thing to do

>They're FICTIONAL CHARACTERS, it doesn't MATTER what happens to FICTIONAL CHARACTERS
>Anyways I just commissioned more loli po-ACKACKACKSCKACKACKACKACKKK!!!

>>4811
but this isn't reddit

what if i post rodscorpion art would i be banned

>>4815
Probably not, we had a gussy thread and he drew much worse shit

>>4810
yet you bring up the analogy of real rape, I just adjusted it to make it more accurate to the situation, yes we have an emotional attachment to ongezellig that's why we are here and care about this more than just wanting to be any other fotm slop

>>4815
What if you posted a perfectly benign soylita with a lollipop? What do you think will happen?

>>4810
Actual /co/pedo nigger in the log. Kill yourself right now. TRVE zaryans treat the characters akin to family, they are precious

>>4815
>what abo-ACK!
Do you want people to?

>>4817
Not the guy who made the analogy, but that's just retarded lol

>>4821
I don't see how you could be in a community about a dead show, dead meme without some kind of attachment

>>4822
besides it's more than just a show, its a whole community

>YOU WILL LET PEOPLE ENJOY THINGS
>YOU WILL REPOST THE PEDO'S ARTWORK
>YOU WILL LISTEN TO MY WHATABOUTISM
>YOU WILL TURN INTO A 4CHANNER
>AND YOU WILL BE HAPPY

>>4825
It's allowed but no one posts it because there's not tranny pedophiles who self insert as 'lita, so there's no need to do anything. When it gets posted its usage is normal

>>4825
I saw a soylita thread on /qa/ here a few hours ago that got deleted doe

>>4827
It was the /co/pedo or some other shitskin probably

>>4825
Wrong answer. Only today a guy eas banned 4 times only because he posted soylita. And that's what MegaMymy was banned for too.

>>4825
well this isn't some random literal who artist making unrelated art, this is a guy who created something that was of great offense to the community and the outrage is justified

>>4822
Comparing real life family rape with shitty ms paint ragebait is retarded and you have to be delusional to even consider it analogous in that analogy (and he's not even saying you should enjoy the rest of his art, just that it shouldn't be completely banned)
>hur dur /co/ pedo argument
I'm one of the people who pioneered zellig puritanposting back on sharty's /qa/, I'm not defending grim (he's reprehensible) I'm just saying you sound like a faggot

>'P IS LITERALLY RAGEBAIT, IT'S A JOKE!

>>4831
I'm not saying it is real the same as genuine rape of course not, but in the case of the analogy he made my amendment makes it more comparable to how it actually is for us.

I have an idea for all the people who's clitties are leaking because they no longer can post their favourite pedo artist. Buy the zelligparty.soy domain, rent a server and make a splinter. Everyone will be happy, both you and us.

>>4835
No, it was an image of soylita with a binky

>>4834
Please do not ruin our image any further by doing this

>>4834
We do not need ANOTHER soysphere pedo splinter

>>4836
that image was obviously sexualized. it was deleted for that, not for being Soylita.

>>4832
Definitionally true, he made the art to get a rise out of people, doesn't change the fact that it's vile
>>4833
But it's still a moot point and makes you sound unhinged
<
Also apparently the messages of the guy who made the analogy are getting deleted so how's that for draconian censorship, not even allowed to argue anymore geg

>>4840
>the messages of the guy who made the analogy are getting deleted
he's clearly deleting them himself.

I don't think that guy even is zaryan at this point, I'm starting to think it is another falseflag after he self deleted those posts.

>>4841
Are you saying that as a janny or just guessing? Because I don't see why he'd keep making replies just to delete them

1984 or advanced mind games, call it

probably the same guy who reposted the "poorly" censored image in the first place

>>4844
If he's deleting them himself then that's some next level psyop tactics, fooled me

>>4843
well, we can get a confirmation of my intuition. Mods, is this true or not

There's no reason why anyone would defend Grim unless they were trying to coopt the thing and allowing pedos to roam free. Pedos are in fact bad and for anyone who's still attached to this dusty view of "let the unrulecucking do its work", it doesn't work, take a look at the jarty or the 'cucks. Same thing can be said for the extreme opposite, where extreme rulecucking kills the culture. Things change overtime, this is the first time Grim drew actual 'p and there's people who say
>Just ignore it
No fuck you nigger I am not going to do that, you guys are too complacent with these people being given a place to exist as long as we ignore them. These people should not be here in the first place, Grim made some fantastic artwork but he really overstepped this time, there's no excusing, there's no amount of convincing that could convince any self-respecting Zaryan of letting his stuff back here. Doing that means being fine with what he does. It's clear people are not fine with it, no one should be. Maybe in the future things will change again, but this is for now, the correct thing to do

>>4848
Dit, zoveel dit

>>4843
I do see a reason, there has been the /co/ pedo lurking us and he revealed himself obviously during and after the bob thread incident, since then he's been spamming porn of the zellig girls, this is another attempt of him to undermine us

>>4837
>>4838
I see no point in being forced to integrate with such people

>>4848
Fair point but I still think the reaction is literally 1984. From the banner to /v/, grims influence is plastered all over the site, especially old oc, and while most admiration has probably turned to disgust and feelings of betrayal (as it has for me) I don't think you can, or should, just erase his involvement with zellig.

>>4840
What was deleted? Post a screenshot

>>4842
>>4843
i only deleted two of my messages. i’m used to deleting stuff because this website is usually slow moving and i can resend the message before another reply comes. i’m sorry for being autistic.
>>4848
>this is the first time Grim drew actual 'p
no it isn’t. it was public knowledge that he had drawn Maya having sex with a child, and that didn’t stop people from continuing to enjoy his art. once again, this mindset that we have to disregard all his work is a new one.
>Doing that means being fine with what he does
do you think every fan of Roman Polanski’s films are okay with him raping teenagers?

>>4817
I'm here because I think Mymy is edgy and cool, not because she's my precious daughteru or something

>>4854
And for the same reason his thread got locked (even for lighter stuff like the Robin Barten drawing), now he's banned because he did it again and drew even worse stuff

>>4855
This. Agugu is literal delusion and we reap what we sow for not cutting off that cancerous growth in it's infancy (pun intended)

>>4851
We'd need to achieve a perfect balance between rules and freedom of posting. Zoot is willing to change rules and take feedback. Who knows what the fuck might happen in the other splinter, it could end up like the jarty or something worse.

>>4858
>entertaining a joke post
Nufallingforbaitcacas...

>>4852
There's nothing wrong about going full 1984 against pedo

>>4858
my take on freedom is that they are free to leave

>>4861
Reddit tier response, when did you join?

>>4862
>not letting people just enjoy things is reddit tier

>>4862
Give him time, he's still acclimatizing

>>4854
apologies for accusing you, it's just that he has been spamming porn and immediately archiving it, the soylita post of today was also his.

Lewis Carroll would be a better analogy than Roman Polanski

>>4866
literal who vs figurative someone

>>4864
i've never used /co/, how long does it take to acclimatize to being a pedo?

>>4854
>drawn Maya having sex with a child, and that didn’t stop people from continuing to enjoy his art
so people were less outraged by maya raping a kid? Whatever could cause this double standard (oh nonono, orwellbros are we shotafags???)

>>4868
Never if you're normal, instantaneously if your skin is the color of coal

>>4869
well there were no genitalia in the pic

>>4869
is maya having sex with a kid exaggarated heavily? the most i saw was a maya demon with hands coming out of it grabbing a kid

>>4872
no, there was an unambiguous one of her embracing him with her legs spread

>>4873
nigawat

>>4872
I don't remember exactly, but there was intercourse drawn.
Anyways, our values evolve over time we no longer tolerate this kind of behavior.