No.868
>>864verafags… THIS IS WHO YOU ARE DROOLING OVER
No.872
>>868xhes not that old you kankermongool
No.875
She reminds me of my mean english teacher I had a crush on in 7th grade
No.890
>>873fuck you i spat my drink out at this
No.1523
upwife
No.1731
>>1728of course we're not /soy/ culture, zellig is NAS, there's no soyboys or anything
by your logic we should permit 'veri and frogniggery in /soy/. you are a retarded fucking subhuman. would you let a tranny compete in women's sports?
No.1744
>>1733nigger you don't get it
IAS isn't dictated by how good or popular something is, it's dictated by the fact if it's a soyjak or not. i am not denying it's SHARTY culture, however it has NO place on /soy/, as /soy/ is exclusively for soyjaks. there is a reason why it isn't just "/sharty/" or "/general/" or whatever.
No.1751
>>1744The moment Chudjak was accepted as IAS was the moment the term lost all meaning
No.1753
>>1751chudjak is indisputably NAS, but he is very culturally connected to soy culture so it has IAS privileges
No.1754
>>1744With the modern rules it's true, /soy/ is for soyjaks only and therefore 'zellig on its own should be disallowed like anything else.
HOWEVER new/soy/ is now filled to the brim with "IAS" coal because of there being no containment for NAS.
A lot of people like to cope that IAS coal is better than NAS coal but its the same analogy as comparing trash and garbage, they are the same.
No.1768
>>1744I get you. However, there some jaks that by themselfs cannot be classified as soyjaks, like chud and cobson.
I would also like to share that one thing I loved about Kuz era sharty is that a few sharty culture NAS threads were allowed on /soy/. This allowed for some interaction between the boards (which were something like 5). It made the site more alive and fun. I don't agree with the "IAS only rule". It basically isolated /soy/ from the other boards.
It's also cancer, since almost nobody can agree what is an IAS and what is a NAS.
No.1769
>>1768>cannot be classified as soyjaks>CobsonHow?
>bald>glasses>open mouth>stubblehe ticks all the boxes
No.1770
>>1769Im not the guy you were responding to but, he doesnt have the ESSENCE of soy. He doesnt look effeminate, he doesnt look like he consumes soy and supports the current thing, he wasnt traced from a soyboy. He checks the technical criteria, but he fails in actually being SOY. That's why he's the most self inserted 'jak
No.1771
>>1769I'm the guy.
Cobson isn't even based on a numale and he is mostly used as a self-insert
Basically this
>>1770 No.1782
Cobson, he's a 'jak without soy.
>>1549 poor little 'mori, about a full year of moderator persecution. I just didn't really care for the porn of prepubescent boys though. MAYBE he lurks here or something
No.1787
>>1754>>1768i see your points and i should consider them, maybe i have gone a bit overboard with my puritanism
No.31866
up
No.31887
STOP NEGROBUMPING!!!!!!!!!!!
No.31961
we hags are aryan
No.94786
zute thread DNI
No.94796
>>94794he was most likely here before you nununununununununununupoopoo
No.94797
>>94796Before or after discontinuation?
No.94798
>>94794Zvte is the oldest fag, put some respect on his name.
No.94799
>>94798Oldest fag for the oldest hag
No.94801
>>94799>oldest fag>look inside>under the minimum age requirementNot like this zarty sistas…
No.94802
>>94801the age req was made in nuzarty when kate raisined up the place