No.81803
Not technically dutch THOUGH
No.81835
Maya's parents are Dutch by nationality, but not Dutch by blood. So only Dutch on paper. Also Ravi isn't native south american injun, he's half "Hindustani" so dot indian.
No.81837
>>81835>injunameriGOD detected
No.81838
>>81835Idk he has too asian (narrow) eyes so the OP may be right
No.81846
>>81838He might have a bit of javanese ancestry, the ethnic groups in Suriname are kind of mutted up
Also Suriname is no longer under Dutch rule, they've been independent since 1975
No.81882
Ravi is half dutch half jeet
No.81883
>>81882What a pitiful existence, even being 1% jeet might actually be a curse
No.81887
>>81883You have the highest chance of being born one than anywhere else in the world.
No.81889
>>81887You have the highest chance of being born a non-white nigger, whites are like 8% of the entire population
No.81890
>>81888Just being born in sub-saharan Africa as well.
No.81891
>>81889Scary facts, I should tell myself when I feel down:"At least I wasn't born with colored skin"
No.81893
>>81891Having european ancestry puts you at risk of being part jew, so every skin color is fucked in some way
No.81904
>>81893Anglos and Celts won.
No.81919
>>81894I accept the former
No.81966
>>81904They lost albeit
The US is going to become less than 50% white by the end of the next democrat presidency and the UK and Ireland are being flooded with brown immigrants in fact London is already less than 50% white (same thing with the rest of the Anglosphere)
No.81967
>>81966yeah, they started well, but they ended badly
No.81968
>>81966Demoralizer 'cord just joined the discussion
No.81970
>>81966Those migrants can still be easily deported
And despite that the Anglos have still secured a cultural victory English has become the de facto world language, the Anglosphere has significant influence on the political affairs of other countries, and Anglo customs and culture have become adopted worldwide
No.81972
>>81969No correlation albeit, just compare Ireland and England.
No.81973
>>81972this is for 1820, for a proper comparison one would have to take into account the densities in every century and calculate the accomplishment per capita
No.81974
I don't think that the Irish are retarded or that the Norwegians are somehow dumber than the Danish
No.81976
>>81973Yeah, but, you know, all those achievements were "partially", sorry for tautology, achieved only because of "a certain ethnic group of peoples". All Italy, France, Germany and Britain — 99% of their progress was on the shoulders of the bearers of the Germanic spirit and blood. This is the main thing we must learn from this data.
>>81974This statistics is more food for thought than a "racial hierarchy" chart actually.
No.81977
>>81976>99% of their progress was on the shoulders of the bearers of the Germanic spirit and bloodI think this contentious, English themselves have a more significant native Briton genetic profile than they do a Germanic one. Second, Scotland contributed heavily to British achievement. Thridly, this ignores the Celtic (native british) culture and beliefs of Anglos. Anglos have particular penchant for liberalism that continental euros lack.
No.81979
>>81976this doesn't explain the utter irrelevance of Scandinavia, unless it's actually the celtic people who are innately innovative
No.82008
>>81979Idk, maybe it's due to the fact Scandinavia lacks cultural diversity (don't confuse with ethno-racial and genetic diversity). I'd seen a research about how it influences innovativeness.
>>81977English still have a significant germanic component, although the Insular Celts aren't the real Celts but a mixture of the local WSH-rich Bell-Beakers and the Continental Celts, thus being closer to the ancient Germanic tribes than the Celts of Central Europe, and this circumstance technically answers your question.
>Continentals are less liberal because of some genetic and ethno-racial reasonsNah, unlikely. Nothern Europeans form one genetic "continuum" or cluster so I don't think there's any deeper reasons than just history.
No.82020
>>82008>English still have a significant germanic component, although the Insular Celts aren't the real Celts but a mixture of the local WSH-rich Bell-Beakers and the Continental Celts, thus being closer to the ancient Germanic tribes than the Celts of Central Europe, and this circumstance technically answers your question.I'll take your word for it. I do know that Eastern English have more Germanic admixture than west anglos, scots, and welsh.
>Nah, unlikely. Nothern Europeans form one genetic "continuum" or cluster so I don't think there's any deeper reasons than just history.I mean yeah ok there's something to be said there. NW Euros (Germanics) are more liberal than the rest of the continent. But I don't think historical reasons alone can explain the sociopolitical divide between Britain and the mainland. Political views are highly heritable for one. Whether this is a result of the Germanic tribes who migrated to Britain being more liberal or a combination of Celt/Germ ancestry or some reason I don't know. Perhaps the conditions of the island itself selected for certain political orientations.
No.82037
>>82020Your assumption based on the conditions of the island is pretty fair I think. I heard about that many times by other internet strangers so it indeedly looks true.
No.82117
Thank God for the Anglos and Celts, they built modern Western civilisation.