No.26023
>>26018You admitted to being a pedo. What did you expect?
No.26026
>>26019even doe mymy was in the same car. how did she survive then
No.26027
>>26026St.Peter saved her
No.26030
>>26028Pedo apologist and a namefag, truly the worst individual possible
No.26031
>>26028pedophilia is much more prevalent on xitter than in the soysphere
No.26032
>>26028Zoot if this isn't enough to ban xer troonass, idk what could. Kill litatroons
No.26035
>>26033>>26028Aw hell… WHO LET BLUD COOK????
💀💀💀
No.26038
>>26028>>26033no one is arguing that loli is the same as child porn, they argue that it is still pedophilic in nature
i personally don’t care about lolicons more than any other porn addict and i tend to give them the benefit of doubt and assume they aren’t pedos, could you explain what you like about lolis that doesn’t also apply to real children?
No.26039
>>26036that's netanyahu, not putin
No.26043
>>26037Stay mad seething uglie
>>26038It's the art style. I like them because of the way they're drawn. The proportions are the cherry on top, and obviously it's not like real life children look like anime characters.
No.26053
what happened to my dear soyzellig…
No.26063
>>26053The same 3 niggers pedos shitting up the site with their kikepedo threads, that's what happened
No.26068
>>26065No, you are actively trying to get it banned by reinforcing the pedo association. Kill yourself.
No.26069
>>26065Among the absolute WORST false flagger I have EVER seen. I'd call you mossad but you lack the competence for that insult
>>26067tsmt, even edgefags have standards
No.26073
>>26072Can't wait for zoot to wake up and boot your ass
No.26076
>>26067I don’t really know who you are sorry, and what I have done to you, but I assure that I am very sorry for being a retard at times. Also, I’ve literally done nothing but complaint about the namefagging to zoot. I started thinking that it’s unbearable a few months after a joined.
Either way, I just got back from my erp sesh, and seeing so many people want a ban on this namefag for being a shitlita fan, I will ban him, but if zoot has something to say about it this is all I could do. Sorry for the wait time!
Edit
>this is just like muh hecking jewtube commentsLast thing, if you have criticisms against me please talk to zoot or me through the /q/ board or email, I am open to criticism and I’d hate to be despised by my fellow zaryans.
No.26077
>>26076gonna namefag outside reanimated collab
im fine with namefield disappearing its not really necessary anymore, planning can happen in cytube + almost everythings finished
No.26078
>>26018his account is completely gone now, did he delete it himself or was it the jannies?
No.26083
>>26081Where exactly have you gotten this idea from? To me it just seems like people are sniffing you out on a regular. Or maybe dementia has gotten ahold of me so early?
Either way my hugest apologies, privacy is something that should be treated with utmost respect, if I have ever disrespected it please forgive me.
>>26077Sure, we’ll just have to wait till zoot wakes up, he has some inactivity periods from time to time.
No.26086
>>26085if they want to be annoying, they might as well. its the first time i used my trip here nigger
No.26094
>>26065>wordsyou're a namefag and a pedo, you mean nothing to us.
No.26095
>>26072>I am both a Zaryan as well as a 'lita enjoyerthis isn't a great look for us, you know. i hope you get lynched, you fucking nigger pedo
No.26099
>>26028You're making a lot of noise about "twitter immigrants" for someone who uses the word "cunny".
No.26134
Im the one who banned you btw
Im Kernüng, heres my schlog profile
https://soyjak.blog/index.php?members/kern%C3%BCng.369/Seethe at me as much as you want you shitskinned pedotranny pajeet maggot
No.26136
>>26134he’s banned on here and his account is completely deleted on the schlog, he couldn’t seethe at you even if he wanted to
No.26139
>>26134least obvious doll's sockpuppet
kill yourself
No.26142
>ongezellig fans are pedophiles
THE JOKES WRITE THEMSELVES!!!!!!!!!!
No.26344
>>26141why does it have the boylover symbol on its forehead? aren’t we stereotyped as loving girls?
No.26348
>>26141>1 yearWhat you a time traveler or some shit?
No.26362
>>26344bluds an expert in the field
No.26363
>>26362He's Chris Hansen or something
No.26387
>>26344*stereotyped as loving little girls
No.26390
>>26387there’s a different symbol for little boy lovers
the Ongezellig cast doesn’t count as little girls, they’re just girls