No.110639
>>110624>In reality, it is very common for soldiers to get cheated on when they are away…It's maladaptive, in fact. Being socially destructive, it's the same base instinct that comes from the need for what we would call "romantic love", but since it's only an evolutionary instinct, it only pushes, and doesn't lead directly, so people often lead astray themselves. Although promiscuous immoral sex stems from good biological impulses, it essentially undermines their fulfillment. Exactly on this basis we have to distinguish more conscious attraction from simple internal urges. If you look deeper than you actually look, biology forces us to separate productive sexual relationships and their types (monogamous monoracial families) from incorrect ones (polygamous, interracial, homosexual, etc.).
No.110640
>>110636"Have had" is actually the present tense, xhud…
No.110641
>>110639“Word salad” posts like this which sound like they were written by aspiring philosophers are almost always completely detached from reality. Whether something is “maladaptive” has not has no bearing on whether or not it exists… or “should” exist.
No.110642
>>110640Uh… it isn’t. “I have” is present tense. I “have had” means that one has had something in the past.
Are you the guy I was replying to? You’re saying you still have a girlfriend?
No.110643
>>110641So you just imply that the "purpose of life" is precisely sex, and not that sex is a tool for achieving this "purpose"? This is a misrepresentation.
No.110644
>>110643It you want to speak in purely biological terms… yes, the purpose of life is sex. Not only does it continue one’s bloodline, but it also serves as the most pleasurable and fulfilling activity that one may partake in.
No.110645
>>110642No, I'm an observer. And as I remember, present continuous represents the action that began once and still continues, correct me if I'm wrong.
No.110646
>>110644Guess why does it serve as one, genius.
No.110647
>>110645If he currently had a girlfriend, he would say “I have a girlfriend”. Saying “I have had a girlfriend” means that he had one in the past, and that experience is relevant to the current conversation.
>>110646Serve as “one” what?
No.110649
>>110647>Serve as one whatI mean it is only this pleasurable because it's biologically the most needed thing in our lives. For everyone.
No.110650
>>110649Yes. How does that contradict anything I’ve said previously?
No.110651
y'all need jesus sweeties
No.110652
lol what the shit is happening in this thread
No.110653
>>110650That does not, right, but the problem is that you're misinterpreting and substituting these things.
No.110654
>>110652Ahem, here's the explanation
>>110621 No.110655
>>110653Provide an example of what you’re referring to. How am I misinterpreting and substituting things.
No.110657
>>11769funny most ain't gonna lie
No.110661
>>110658All of that is just some weird semantic word-game that you are playing with yourself. Whether sex is the goal in-and-of itself or the means of achieving a goal is irrelevant.
This is why I said before that posts like this are always detached from reality… the question of whether or not a dichotomy exists between these two things does not physically translate over to reality… it only serves as a hypothetical though-experiment that can only exists in your mind.
No.110671
>>110660Ev&oe it's a discussion that involves at least two Christians which defend morality on biological grounds arguing what is naturally reasonable and what is not reasoning from these very biological grounds.
>>110661>Whether sex is the goal in-and-of itself or the means of achieving a goal is irrelevantAnd why do you think so?
>this dichotomy exists only inside of your headWhat a dichotomy? "Romantic love"/"trivial lust"? Whatever you call it, it's just a fact there are bad and good strategies in the "life goal" achievement which is reproduction (or gene preservation through reproducing if more precisely).
No.110672
>>110671>And why do you think so? Explain to me how something like that translates over to, and has a tangible effect on, reality.
>there are bad and good strategies in the "life goal" achievement I don’t think anyone in the thread ever argued this. I’ve always said that people who are attracted to each other want to have sex with each other.
No.110673
>>110672>Explain to me how something like that translates over to, and has a tangible effect on, reality.Well it's simply helps us in understanding what we actually need to live happier lives and be a successful breed.
>>there are bad and good strategies in the "life goal" achievement >I don’t think anyone in the thread ever argued this. I’ve always said that people who are attracted to each other want to have sex with each otherAlbeit you technically equated things like smash-and-dash (bad strategies) with actual families (good strategies), this is why I got butthurt at you
No.110675
>>110673>Well it's simply helps us in understanding what we actually need to live happier lives and be a successful breed.There’s nothing that needs to be “understood”. People who are horny for each other will fuck… and that fucking will generate babies. People understand this intuitively… they don’t need to read a book or entertain abstract concepts to understand it.
>Albeit you technically equated things like smash-and-dash (bad strategies) with actual families I didn’t. That is likely a byproduct of you reading through the message too quickly and getting “butthurt” for no reason. I merely said that both of these scenarios were instigated by the same feelings (lust/sexual attraction).
No.110677
>>110676To “generate” means “cause to arise or come about”. It’s an appropriate word.
No.110678
>>110675>There’s nothing that needs to be “understood”. People who are horny for each other will fuck… and that fucking will generate babies. People understand this intuitively… they don’t need to read a book or entertain abstract concepts to understand it.So you think that spiders' strategy for breeding & raising children is effective? Lol. Well it's too subtle, the joke is that spiders bear little spiderinis and then genocide them en-masse.
>You're butthirt for no reason, I'm agreeing with you (allegedly)Ok Fritzl, turns out my opinion is true (woah)
No.110679
>>110678>So you think that spiders' strategy for breeding & raising children is effective? Lol. Well it's too subtle, the joke is that spiders bear little spiderinis and then genocide them en-masse.You think you understand more about nature than nature itself… like you have the right to “critique” the way the world is? That is bizarre and nonsensical.
>You're butthirt for no reason, I'm agreeing with you (allegedly)I guess? You are indeed getting upset for no reason. If you agree that lust/sexual attraction is the promary motivator for male/female interactions… then yes, we are in agreement.
No.110680
>>110677"generate babies" is just funny LOL
>>110678"Ok Fritz" OMG Ongezellig reference!!!!
No.110681
>>110680Don't confuse fritzl with fritz, zister…
No.110682
>>110679Ph, and I should say that the method that spiders rear their babies is indeed effective… as there are literally quadrillions of them on Earth.
No.110683
>>110681"Fritzl" OMG Ongezellig reference!!!!
(I forgot the L)
No.110684
>>110683I'm American is fritzl an insult in Europe?
No.110686
>>110685Now that's not very nice
No.110687
>>110685boring. come up with something new!
No.110688
>>110679>You think you understand more about nature than nature itself… Translating this into real english: "I AM DA NATURE"
>But where's your right to do things I don't like HUH?There's no such a thing as a right to criticize anything
>Well if X is X then we agreeBreath-taking point, indeed
>>110684It's a name for pedophiles and sodomites as a whole
>>110682And if not their strategy there'd be more of them. Quite important detail, you know
No.110689
>>110688I can tell you’re no longer arguing sincerely. You started off being overly-verbose and are now being brash and obtuse… “I AM DA NATURE”. You’ve already admitted before that you were butthurt, so I am going to perceive this as you conceding from the discussion.
No.110807
>>110601asexual people also get into romantic relationships, that's a clear example. what you seem to not get (much like the other EPI victims of this modern era) is that the physical pleasure people experience from sex often isn't the main thing they enjoy about it, what they enjoy more is the connection they're having with the other person and the fact that they're sharing that pleasure with them.
No.110808
>>110807wait, You're saying people do it for connection and not just cuz it's fun?
No.110811
>>110808most porn addicted nigger award