No.5302
Hey, would anyone here spend own time saving all that content amassed up on the Zarty (I mean, every thread in the 'log)? I don't think it would be sooo hard to do, thereby I have the plan how we can perform it:
>We will appoint people who are responsible for archiving boards (one zaryan = one board). There will be no namefagging, so every participant in this action will be named like “Zaryan [name of the board]”.
>Every participant will have time to save all the content of his board which was amassed from the beginning of the site itself until July 20th.
>Deadline to complete work — before August 1st (mutuable?).
And yeah, surely I know the Zarty will functionate yet for two months, so, I hope, in the last week before closing of the Zarty, every participant will save the rest of the content that will be amassed in these two months (August-September) on his board.
NOTE
This plan is in case the purchase of the sute will be not guaranteed. But for now, we have what we have…
No.5303
You retards, did you not even LISTEN to the admin? You just saw that zoot wasn’t gonna stick around and concluded that the entire zarty will evaporate into the ground. I’ve seen a ton of people willing to buy the zarty, and only a day has passed since the news. Stop panicking, the zarty is just for sale.
No.5304
>>5303This geg
Stop doomposting that the site is guaranteed to close, it's quite likely someone is buying it
even on the off chance that nobody buys it angeleno said he would be willing to host an archive of the site.
<orange spaceBut if you're still schizo about everything being lost go ahead and archive
No.5305
>>5303Zarty's future still not defined. I would be glad if everything was already finally decided. But you're partly right, I panick slightly too hard. As I mentioned in the original post, there are whole two months to save the Zarty.
No.5306
demoralizating 'cord woke up
No.5307
>>5306the fact that admin stopped caring is demoralizing
No.5308
according to
>>>/zellig/32707 the zarty weighs only 10gb including all text and active content, archiving it is not that big of an undertaking
No.5309
>>5308Seems like even one person alone can archive it in a few days
No.5311
>>5310right click, save video as
No.5312
>>5311See my problem:
>“My url is alive and I want to archive its content”>domain of the .webm file >“Save”>Saved as a shitty broken linkUoooooooh