No.29717
too2q did some changes to soruum, im currently uploading them to the server
No.29925
>>29514>>29610Are you using a userstyle that makes it display wrong?
No.30383
you can now tag people using @username and you can drop images onto text by drag/droping
No.30385
>>30383BUT without notifications yet, those will come in the next update
No.30386
>>30383are you gonna add a discord theme to make it easier for people to adjust
No.30387
>>30386It's actually when are you redirecting it to discord you nulig
No.30388
>>30386not high on the priority list but i can notify you when it's ready so you don't feel out of place
No.30468
what is this?
No.30470
>>30469they aren't allowed here either
No.30509
>>30469refer to
>>30488why ought we allow under aged members?
also NIGGAS, POST OCs! WE NEED MORE MEN!
No.30513
>>30511try tor, those are routing issues, you may be able to connect from a different location
No.30514
>>30513maybe we should switch to mymy or their other future european locations
https://blog.kyun.sh/p/amsterdam-finally No.30522
>>30511I'm picking the pirate thank you
No.30523
>>30509because theres no material on this website that is inherently a negative influence to a minor that would be using this very website, furthermore theres nothing inherently negative or inherently bad about letting those under the age of eighteen post on here, maybe a slight spike in lower quality posts but considering this is a website primarily for a internet shitposting culture inspired web series you are setting a standard that this will be a inherently un-serious site for an un-serious topic. you ought to let minors onto the site because the show itself is a cartoon. Any problems that could be attributed to an underage user (faggotry, trannyisms ect) could be applied to most other forms of niggertry which is already policed, a sixteen year old for example shouldn't be gate-kept from ongezellig over an arbitrary rule that doesn't really make sense, someone posting porn or being an annoying sperg or spamming gore will already be banned regardless of their age, and a well behaved poster who doesn't break rules shouldn't be punished for what is essentially agefagging
No.30524
i rest my case that age-gate keeping should only apply to places where it actually makes sense, and i simply fail to see why it would make sense for this website
No.30526
imagine age gate keeping an image board for say, spongebob
No.30527
Someone katepill the phono above me and tell him why the age rule exist
No.30528
also lets be honest with ourselves, half of the users on this site are definitely underaged and just lie about their age
No.30530
>>30529and i suppose you should wear the dress and get raped if you enter the pizza place?
(god tier refrence nobody will get this)
No.30531
>>30530youre definitely underage faggot geg
No.30533
please margepill me as to why this rule exists, at least one reason
No.30534
>>30532this was sarcastic by the way
No.30535
>>30533Ever heard of Kate schoppenboer? Or simply Kate? She used to post here somewhat regularly, low quality stuff, bait, nonsense and sometimes very questionable stuff
Guess what, she was 14 at the time (now nearing 16) and since she couldn't keep herself from derailing threads and being an annoyance everywhere, mods had to intervene and create the age rule just to properly get rid of her
No.30536
>>30535…why not just…ban her for being an annoying faggot?
No.30537
>>30536You underestimate how resilient minors can be
No.30538
>>30537okay but blanket banning all the wholesome little chudlets (or just making it VERBOTEN to mention your age) to fuck over one annoying pooner seems a bit overkill
No.30539
>>30523This guy makes a compelling argument which I am sure the jannies will listen to
No.30540
>>30538You asked for one example and I provided one example, there's more but Kate's case was the final nail for the implementation of the rule
No.30693
>>30511>ends in 5 hours>still unavailable after 11 hoursjust a reminder that it works when you use Tor and you can post from Tor, you just need to wait for anpovool (same thing with the booru probably)
you can also try some nophono vpns from random countries, may work too as this is purely a networking issue
No.30709
>>30708>Romanian hosting provider stole the website zoot worked on for a whole year as soon as he uploaded the code to their serversTypical
No.30710
>>30709we've progressed to getting new outages even before the previous outages have ended
No.30719
>>30523there's a lot so I will say this:
there is a difference when it comes to communities that allow and disallow minors. different topics are discussed, people react in different ways etc. I prefer to interact with "grown ups".
>you ought to let minors onto the site because the show itself is a cartoonis/ought problem + cartoon =/= its for minors + the club isnt ongezellig focused (i presume you are talking about the club, not the zarty), its an original content creation site, where people can make or talk about mature things (something not being hardcore porn doesnt make it automatically suitable for underaged users + you cannot expect the same value of opinion/interaction).
That being said, indeed in theory a user can lie about his age. I have limits when it comes to moderation, hence the "we do not recommend underage users to lurk here". Officially allowing minors would mean revolving moderation around that. They lie and stay, it's their fault if something happens. If they act mature, then ok.
18 isnt a magical number, I agree. There's also the note below the punishments (which you cut out in your screenshot) that says that the rules are general, not specific. In other words, each individual situation requires an individual solution, and, for example, if there is somebody who is 17,92399329 years old and i dont find him immature, acting too edgy or something else, I aint gonna ban him.
>>30709too2q made the code, so he takes most of the credit.
>>30710we shall consider switching to Mymy if things continue to go this way.
No.30721
>>>30523
>there's a lot so I will say this:
>there is a difference when it comes to communities that allow and disallow minors. different topics are discussed, people react in different ways etc. I prefer to interact with "grown ups".
>
>>you ought to let minors onto the site because the show itself is a cartoon
>
>is/ought problem + cartoon =/= its for minors + the club isnt ongezellig focused (i presume you are talking about the club, not the zarty), its an original content creation site, where people can make or talk about mature things (something not being hardcore porn doesnt make it automatically suitable for underaged users + you cannot expect the same value of opinion/interaction).
>
>That being said, indeed in theory a user can lie about his age. I have limits when it comes to moderation, hence the "we do not recommend underage users to lurk here". Officially allowing minors would mean revolving moderation around that. They lie and stay, it's their fault if something happens. If they act mature, then ok.
>
>18 isnt a magical number, I agree. There's also the note below the punishments (which you cut out in your screenshot) that says that the rules are general, not specific. In other words, each individual situation requires an individual solution, and, for example, if there is somebody who is 17,92399329 years old and i dont find him immature, acting too edgy or something else, I aint gonna ban him.
>
>>>30709
>too2q made the code, so he takes most of the credit.
>
>>>30710
>we shall consider switching to Mymy if things continue to go this way.
No.30728
>>30719i will respond to this
sQQn im just too tired to write a wall of text No.30735
>>30728go ahead, but keep in mind you aint gonna change my opinion. The general rule is no minors allowed and it stays. Not every community has to be a daycare center.
btw the site is up. check the collab thread.
No.30747
>>30735What do you mean you don't like kids man, they're like the heart of a community, don't you want another wojak party situation, you must be an oldfag