No.20592
you are not a femcel doe
No.20594
>>20590This is trve. I always found her relatable since I'm a social retard (evendoebeit I somehow have friends), so I guess I like feeling heard of zoiets.
No.20595
>>20592I am in fact a man.
No.20597
apparently femcels do exist but I'm still pretty sure (at least 94% sure) they do not exist.
No.20598
>>20597If they do exist, they're probably just as reclusive as incels.
No.20601
>>20600I've contemplated artfagging for a while, so maybe I could draw Maya to ease my woes.
No.20603
>>20597femcels only exist because they can't get chad
No.20606
>>20604maya in onesie wabag
No.20607
>>20604True, everything in my life has been falling apart since the start of September. But I know that God will still be there for me; religion is the only thing that fulfills me at this point.
No.20608
>>20605MWABAA (Maya Will Always Be An Aryan)
No.20612
>>20610thats just agugu making baby sounds
No.20613
>>20612Ugh. Again with the aguguposter derailing every thread
Just keep this forced unfunny brimstone in /drenthe/ and lock it there.
No.20616
>>20613This isn't even me.
Ugh. Agugu posters are so obsessed they have to pretend to be me in order to keep their forced brimstone alive.
You are so pathetic and boring.
No.20619
>>20616geg i couldnt tell
No.20624
Holy derailment.
No.20628
>>20597Femcels are untermenschen btw
No.20646
>>20645WaifuGODding is aryan though
No.20648
>>20644>even a 0/10 foid can easily get a 7/10 man but sub5 men dont get shit because foids refuse to settle for their looksmatchWigga go outside and watch how other people live. It's terrible how ugly people are in couples with the beautiful, and both roles are quite uniformly adopted by both men and women. There's hardly a disproportion.
>A hook-up app did a study based on their users Irrelevant source. The sampling is non-representative. Most of normies doesn't use such apps to get a gf/bf.
TLDR incel culture is a part of the pop-culture degeneracy trends and is entirely anti-White and anti-Christian. Thou shalt never cause misandry nor misogyny.
No.20650
>>20648Most ideological incels are racemixxed beyond repair, that's why they can't get sex.
No.20653
>>20648>>20650hypergamy is universal female behaviour, has nothing to do with race
>anti-Christian>degeneracy>thouSNCA tradcath larp
No.20654
>>20653They don't reproduce. Self-solving problem.
No.20655
>>20654lmao get a load of this faggot
low SMV men don't reproduce but low SMV women do
eugenics will never work out because men will never stop reproducing with low quality women
(You) are guilty of picrel
No.20656
>>20655Conservative women have the highest fertility (obviously). Man-hating feminists etc. have only cats and dogs. Whatever delusions you have about low quality women having tons of children with high quality men are false and not based on any available data.
No.20657
>>20656>Conservative women have the highest fertility (obviously). Man-hating feminists etc. have only cats and dogs.picrel
>Whatever delusions you have about low quality women having tons of children with high quality men are false and not based on any available data.literally every single stat i posted shows its true albeit
No.20660
>>20657>picrelThat's exactly how I know you have no idea what you are talking about.
No.20661
>>20660>The extension of the 80/20 Rule, is the 64/4 Rule and the 51/1 Rule, or "Two-thirds of women will chase the top 4% of men" and "Half of all women will chase the top 1% of men". This is borrowed from research on management optimization and Agile Development, where work characteristics are ranked based on impact. (https://www.timewax.com/blog/the-80-20-rule-in-project-resource-planning/, https://www.vthink.com.au/single-post/2017/08/18/the-644-principle)>To paraphrase FastCompany (https://www.fastcompany.com/3069049/beyond-the-80-20-rule-this-formula-might-make-you-rethink-time-management), "A Time" is 0.8% of effort for 51.2% of results (256XD), "B Time" is 3.2% effort for 12.8% of time (16XD), "C Time" is 16% of effort for 16% of time (4XD), "D Time" is 20% of the work for 80% of the time (1 XD). In the case of the Blackpill, Face and Height would be A Time (Genetics), Looks and Frame (Things that can be Maxxed) would be B Time, Status and Game (Redpill) would be C Time, Bluepill strategies would be D Time.But keep coping and telling yourself how youre a based antiracemixing rabbi yeshua bar yosef worshipper
No.20662
>>20589thread derailed by a blackpill psyop.
DNI, SHUT IT DOWN No.20663
>>20662geg for a retard that insists on having the last word you sure did quit quickly
next time bring your own statistics to disprove mine
No.20665
>>20662thats aryan nuzartycuck
OP was blogposting so its not like we "ruined" a good thread anyway
No.20666
>>20665OP here, this is trve. It's a blogpost so it doesn't really matter if it gets detailed as long as it isn't niggardly topics.
No.20667
>>20664Those are not reddit. I mean, it's 4cuck spacing, if speaking more precisely. No gaps between paragraphs are the actual reddit thing if you think about it.
No.20668
>>20653>spamming with literally-what diagrams and statsSNCA cherry-picking which represents absolutely nothing.
>tradcath larp detectedI can say I despise catholix and even more the eastern orthodox but what's really important is that you're on the same side with the schweinehunden like Elliot Rodger and other racemixed mongrels which says for itself. Idk, breakdown your delusional data by race anyway, I don't want to talk about nons as I don't care about these ugly and cruel beasts, whom you mimic so good. This "it's all da shiksas- I MEAN (white) women!" agenda is entirely jewish. And your entire understanding of women, men, and how they interact with each other comes solely from (((porn))) and (((their))) folklore, or, at best, from persons whose faces are the most accurate image of the 56% percent meme. Go fuck a goat, like a proud """masculine""" mudslim, if you hate your own women this much, wigger.
>Woomeen le bad… cuz they act like me, for women repeat after men due to their conformism, but they are still to blame for all No.20670
>>20668its not cherrypicking just because you dont believe or understand it. its actually a pretty general phenomenon that also applies to this specific case of male-female relationships. your personal incredulity doesnt invalidate data
>This "it's all da shiksas- I MEAN (white) women!" agenda is entirely jewishbecause women are all innocent little angels who can do no wrong, theyre just brainwashed by DA JOOS, right?
i literally never said anything specifically about white women, i just said women in general are hypergamous. youre the one being a pissbaby chudcel and attacking me with adhominem insults about my race and religion
No.20672
>>20671tsmt this obsessed faggot has been sperging out about race, muslims and jews supposedly conspiring up anti-christian plots since his first reply while i never ever mentioned any of those things up until now
No.20675
>>20670>because women are all innocent little angels who can do no wrong, theyre just brainwashed by DA JOOS, right?Oh yes! Both white men and women brainwashed by (((them))), and you can't force women be different from men, so start with the men. The original sin is when Adam left his wife Eve, and if it didn't happen, Eve wouldn't have been deceived by the (((serpent))). This is how the world works. And concerning your words towards my alleged incredulity, dating apps don't represent the whole society. Not to mention that their target audience must be initiatally degenerate to even use such stuff. Most of the normies aren't that goytcattle'd to use these apps, hear me?
>i literally never said anything specifically about white women, i just said women in general are hypergamousThere's no such a thing as "women in general". There's no "we" but in general". They are not "we". We are we, not they.
>youre the one being a pissbaby chudcel and attacking me with adhominem insults about my race and religionSo you're a bruin goatfucker? Or you're accusing me of insulting my own race? Holy schizo, cease your faggotry already. Your own shitstats show a "change" since the 1950s, so your words aren't even sincere but a copypast that finds a response inside of your filthy heart. Degenerate.
>meh the puritan witch-hunter is moralfagging YES I AM, and I am disgusted of your filth. What is that? The abominations of Canaan? Only browns can build their lives around it, and in 99% of times exactly they are those who do so. The only thing that I'm saying that everything that is important to the incels is surreal. All the data is false and all the conclusions are speculations, and all the topics they're into aren't present in the real world. Their heads are filled with an obscure loser mythology that's posed by them as having something to do with reality BUT IT DOESN'T. That's not real Nazism, that's not even racist, every aspect of inceldom is against each of the principles of White nationalism. I merely can't express my entire hatred of this phenomenon so I'm just giving up. Your pride with your blindness is simply blinding me and I'm forgetting how to type. Fuck this shit and you personally. Find some morality, you underman.
No.20676
>>20672Ofc I'm talking about it, because all that stuff is at least real, while the "women don't want to have sex with me WAAAAAAH" conspiracy is only inside your head
No.20677
>>20675>because women are all innocent little angels who can do no wrong, theyre just brainwashed by DA JOOS, right?<Oh yes! Both white men and women brainwashed by (((them))), and you can't force women be different from men, so start with the men. The original sin is when Adam left his wife Eve, and if it didn't happen, Eve wouldn't have been deceived by the (((serpent))). This is how the world works. And concerning your words towards my alleged incredulity, dating apps don't represent the whole society. Not to mention that their target audience must be initiatally degenerate to even use such stuff. Most of the normies aren't that goytcattle'd to use these apps, hear me?I'm not the guy, you're debaiting but this sound like it's full of kike speech, but the rest is correct, though
No.20678
>>20675i stopped reading your schizobabble after "original sin", but dating apps do represent the majority of people
>There's no such a thing as "women in general". There's no "we" but in general". They are not "we". We are we, not they.What?
No.20681
>>20679>soybooru filenamenucaca not like this
No.20682
>>20678>behold my 1 KB pixel trash, it's surely proves my point!This doesn't make your data relevant since it's gathered from only one ceratin site + who cares if there's no racial breakdown of these "statistics"? And how would such things say anything about women's nature if your own words claim that it wasn't like this decades ago (see the 1955 VS 2015 pic)? Not that the pic was real but you got it.
>What?The sampling error increases because it likely includes many non-whites, but we sure don't have any info about how this data was gathered and etc., is it from the US? Is it from Britain? Maybe, Germany? France? Idk, that's all just a pretentious schizophasia transferred to infographics.
No.20683
>>20678full resolution because it uploaded as a thumbnail for some reason
>Not to mention that their target audience must be initiatally degenerate to even use such stuff.that was true only in the late 90s and early 00s when the very first dating apps came out, they were seen as something that only losers use because internet was still alien tech to normies back then.
No.20684
>>20681My gallery was way too big to try to find that very gif. I have kind of thousands of files and I just couldn't find the gifted so yeah.
No.20686
>>20683>Your words about the target audience are only applied to the 90sNo I mean how many people you met irl who used the apps to find the gf or at least had those? Such shit is popular among schoolers but they use bots in telegram instead as a rule. Therefore, your data is a distorted, exaggerated image of reality.
No.20687
>>20685<Your sources, xir>Rosenfeld et alNot like this…
No.20688
>>20686>how many people you met irl who used the apps to find the gf or at least had those?not irl„ but just go on r/tinder, its one of the most active subs and the userbase is majority female
>Such shit is popular among schoolers but they use bots in telegram instead as a rule. please show a single example of this
>>20687>ITS DA JOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSS No.20690
>>20689or however*
if youre going to muttquote do it right nucaca
No.20691
>>20688>not irl„ but just go on r/tinder <…>Said enough. Do you really think it's worth of discussing? Reddit is another 4cuck for normies, they barely can distinguish these. Believe me, it's a common thing.
>Any example of schooler bots for dating?Since I'm a ESL zigger slavoidsky I can't give an example that isn't in cyrillic. Sowwy xhud.
No.20692
>>20690I couldn't decide what to put so I just intended to put both phrases and eventually forgot to add the "or []ever" part in the middle. My bad.
No.20694
>>20691it doesnt matter if reddit is 4chan or vice versa, or if normies can distinguish between the two, it is worth discussing because online data is often more reliable than personal surveys thanks to people not answering truthfully or not understanding the question
>I can't give an example that isn't in cyrillic.ill take an example that is in cyrillic, screen translate is a thing you know.
No.20695
>>20693Better than the agugulee versus agugufaggot duels tbh
No.20696
>>20694>…it is worth discussing because online data is often more reliable than personal surveys thanks to people not answering truthfully or not understanding the questionWhether the data is irl or online, I don't care. Because that's not important. There are much more important things, for example, the Great Replacement. I know incels love bruin vaginas so it's not a problem for them, but let's pretend you all are not like this.
>I'll translate the exampleOk, I'm namedropping "ДайВинчик".
No.20698
>>20696>DaiVinchiki said ill translate a screenshot, not go on a website i dont even have an account for. you cant just namedrop some literal whos telegram channel
No.20699
>>20697i repeat myself but at the end of the day what im saying is 'femcels' are yet another cheap attempt by women to invade the remaining few male exclusive spaces
No.20700
>>20699I still don't believe they exist (at least 94% sure).
No.20702
>>20698>just namedrop telegram channelsWdym, why? It's meaningless. I highly doubt there are dating chats in telegram (or any other social media) but the gay ones, you know.
No.20703
>>20701foids don't use these types of sites doe
No.20704
>>20701>prove X>*X is proven*>ok but i dont care if its true because… STOP BEING GAY YOURE KILLING LE WHITE RACE>>20702we are probably failing to communicate because of the language barrier, but you said dating apps arent actually popular and that 'schoolers' use telegram instead.
No.20705
>>20703They use gay clubs to avoid being raped or harassed, in fact
No.20706
>>20705why exactly are men not allowed to have exclusive spaces but women do? please explain your reasoning, i am very curious
No.20707
>>20704>I just greenquoted you, now it's over for you, /pol/cel!Evendoe I joined the argument not to discuss femcels and so.
>You said that X and YYes I indeedly said these things. You want to clarify the details? I don't know.
No.20708
>>207071. you made an assertion
2. prove it
the proof of burden lies with the side making the claim. do i really need to teach you the basics of debate?
No.20709
>>20706It wasn't that women MUST go to the gay clubs, I actually stand against homosexuality and gay clubs including (as if it wasn't obvious). And I actually support some gender segregation (not in the islamic terms).
No.20712
>>20709i have no idea if youre the slavGOD or the other guy but lets go back a few posts
>>da ebil woomeen try to invade our internet gay clubs! Alarm, fellow gaycels, we're in danger of interacting with the other sex!this implies men are absolutely required to let women in their space and interact with them, but women arent required to let men in their space and interact with them
i ask you why this double standart, since women lose their mind over men trying to join predominantly female spaces
No.20713
>>20712example is trannies in women sports
No.20714
>>20713doesnt answer my question at all but okay
No.20715
>>20714I'm not
>>20712 , I just posted an example is all
No.20717
>>20708What should I show to you, lmao? The link to the bot? You can find it on your own. I just don't know whether there are analogues of that in the West or not. Anyway, dating apps are still an untermensch thing which has to not exist. It's to that your claims were like "oh no, soooo many men are rejected by women on these apps, we must do something with it!", and it's like ??? well the main problem while discussing this incel stuff is that it's beyond comprehension, it's all more like they just love to hate without a reason.
>Let's just go back a few posts >*the citation*>this implies men are absolutely required to let women in their space and interact with them, but women arent required to let men in their space and interact with themNo, why should it? It only implied that when degenerate communities are ruined it's a good result afterall. I'm not fond of femceldom as well, because it's degenerate whenever men or women want death upon an entire sex (especially inside of their own race, lol). You see that most of the white feminists are obsessed with white men and are okay with nons, while white (or not so white..?) incels are obsessed with white women and are interracial White-Male-Non-Femals fetishists (if not worse).
No.20718
incredible derailment
No.20719
The story is repeating. I wonder if that's the same guy.
No.20720
>>20717>What should I show to you, lmao? The link to the bot?yes, that wouldve been very helpful actually, alas
>You can find it on your own.i obviously cannot, you said a single word in kyrgyz and expected me to go off it
>soooo many men are rejected by women on these apps,yes, thats what the stats show
>we must do something with it!i said nothing of the sort
No.20721
>>20720>I can't find the site with this one kyrgyz word[VK LINK]In telegram —
[TELEGRAM USERNAME]Here you go
>so my stats are correctIrrelevant since dating apps must be perished with their (((creators)))
>I haven't said anything about what to do about thatSo it's been just an empty talk all this time? What did you want to prove then? Why incels or related sibculture faggots are so obsessed with snca things like dating apps and so???
No.20722
>>20721go back, holy retard
No.20723
>>20721youre putting words in my mouth about me somehow saying that men should retaliate against women and genocide the entire sex with a side of racebait
i just said women are hypergamous lmao
im not even going to bother with addressing the latter part of your rely becauss i try to debate you and you keep screeching about jews and race
No.20724
>>20723>>20721thoughts on race mixing?
No.20725
>>20724dont care honestly, besides its impossible to prevent with globalisation and such
No.20726
>>20725yay, bleaching shall spread
No.20727
>>20723>i just said women are hypergamous lmaoIt's funny how your own holywar pics, in trying to prove it, fail and prove a completely different thing.
>example https://soyzellig.party/qa/src/1761073643538-2.pngAlso, other two graphs were about appearance and how "le ungrateful women" rate men lower than they rate the opposite sex. I really can't comprehend what problem there is about it (as if it was important or notable), and how it's connected to hypergamy…
No.20729
>>20726We all can tell it's bait, man
No.20730
>>20727><…> how it's connected to hypergamy…the 80/20 rule. 80% percent of women go for the top 20% (in terms of sexual market value, i.e face, height, money status) men.
you can't divide 20 by 80 - so the same men date multiple women at once, and vice versa. this is the fault of both men statusmaxxing (having multiple partners is seen as 'alpha') and women resourcemaxxing (leeching off as much money as possible from as many men as possible)
No.20732
>>20731that's a teenager nigger
No.20733
>>20732that is a teenage nigger, indeed
No.20735
>>20733yeah, that's a nigger
No.20736
>>20730>the 80/20 rule.Not a rule, factually. Your own memes depict it as being a peculiarity of the XXI century. Not that everything else in the reply is wrong and that a lot of people don't live like this nowadays but still. The only cure to this is high morality. Instead of it you seem to propose nothing but embarrassing this awfulness (totally gay decision btw).
No.20737
>>20731Coco mogs her, and so does even Yfke. Also, if you're not racist, and support miscegenation, you're COMMUNIST. So chud yourself or kys instead. It's your choice.
No.20738
>>20736>Your own memes depict it as being a peculiarity of the XXI century.and what century are we in right now? geg youre talking as if were 100 years into the future and the data is outdated
No.20739
>>20738I only meant that it's the problem of the modern weimar societies. I already mentioned what's to cure this social disease. But you don't listen me since you all are kind of communists who accept and praise race-mixing. This is a serious signal. And how can such persons even come to places like Soyzellig? No idea.
No.20741
>>20740
>Good luck then
Demoralizer.
No.20742
>the concentration of ESL in this reply is a bit higher than usual but if i understand correctly youre saying that the current dating dynamics of the 21st century arent normal and we should return to tradition, right?
if thats the case you have to undo the 19th amendment, the sexual revolution and civil rights movement. good luck with that
obsessed website brapped and deleted my reply
No.20744
Oh wait it's correct, thought there was two arrows at the beginning
No.20746
>>20743whatever
anyways are you actually kyrgyz or just speak the language?
No.20749
>>20745Deuteronomy 7:2-8
>>20746I'm just a foreign speaker
No.20750
>>20749
<New International Version (NIV) (for betas)7 The Lord did not set his affection on you and choose you because you were more numerous than other peoples, for you were the fewest of all peoples
(2)and when the Lord your God has delivered them over to you and you have defeated them, then you must destroy them totally.Make no treaty with them, and show them no mercy.
(3) Do not intermarry with them. Do not give your daughters to their sons or take their daughters for your sons,
(4) for they will turn your children away from following me to serve other gods, and the Lord’s anger will burn against you and will quickly destroy you.
(5) This is what you are to do to them: Break down their altars, smash their sacred stones, cut down their Asherah poles and burn their idols in the fire.
(6) For you are a people holy to the Lord your God. The Lord your God has chosen you out of all the peoples on the face of the earth to be his people, his treasured possession.
(7) The Lord did not set his affection on you and choose you because you were more numerous than other peoples, for you were the fewest of all peoples
<King James Version (KJV) (For Chads)(2) And when the Lord thy God shall deliver them before thee; thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them:
(3) Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son.
(4) For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly.
(5) But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire.
(6) For thou art an holy people unto the Lord thy God: the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.
(7) The Lord did not set his love upon you, nor choose you, because ye were more in number than any people; for ye were the fewest of all people:
(8) But because the Lord loved you, and because he would keep the oath which he had sworn unto your fathers, hath the Lord brought you out with a mighty hand, and redeemed you out of the house of bondmen, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt.
No.20751
>>20750Yeah the early modern English sounds more germanic and, properly, more english (or anglish, in this regard)