/qa/ - Question & Answer

>>15397
Have you accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior?

I failed as a Christian and now just live life as a hypocritical cynical believer. It's over for me zros…

>>15397
What's the reason?

>>15397
Probably reading the Bible

>>15397
Oh, so you would like to listen internet schizos on this matter?

>>15401
Definitely*

>>15400
well i haven't looked into it until recently. all this time i viewed the Christian faith as idolatry because the idea of saying that a man is God in flesh and worshipping him or saying that God could have a son seemed very wrong. but the current state of the world and observing the actions of jews changed me as a person. I found out about Isaiah 53 by chance and it inspired me a lot. incredible how a text written centuries earlier seems to describe what happened with Jesus. Another one was Revelation 3:9. I already believed that ashkenazi "jews" of today are not jews at all, they are the descendants of the turkic Khazarian empire who converted en masse to satanic talmudism circa 9th century, and when russians drove them out of the khazarian empire, they migrated to europe still LARPing as jews out of spite, even doe they dont actually have any ties to the biblical land of israel at all. Khazars appeared almost a millenia after Jesus, yet he prophesizes about them in Revelation 3:9 "Behold, I will make those of the synagogue of Satan who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie, behold, I will make them come and bow down before your feet, and they will learn that I have loved you." this is incredible. How did he know? Also in the book of Daniel it says to the jewish people, jerusalem and the temple will be destroyed by a prince, and this will happen after messiah came and a new covenant has been made. jerusalem and the temple was desroyed in the year 70 by Titus who was a Roman prince, and this indeed happened shortly after Jesus came. I have to look more into what's up with this trinity thing, but i am starting to believe there is truth in this faith

>>15404
Hello identitybro. Just typing this to inform you made some mistakes here. See: firstly, it was Revelation 2:9, not 3:9. Secondly, the Jews are the Canaanites (genetically proven), not the Turkic Hohol Khazars or whoever those eastern volgic nomads were.
>Romans fulfilled the prophecy
Pretty accurate though.

>>15404
Well remember to research on atheism too if you do try and convert cause there's some pretty strong arguements against Christianity.

>>15406
the jews of Jesus' time were canaanite of course. but the zionists of today, the ashkenazis, the bergs, steins and witzs, they don't have connections to the real jews. they have german,polish surnames, their forefathers migrated to europe not from the ancient land of israel, but from Khazaria. these people converted to talmudic rabbinism circa 9th century, they picked this religion themselves. i fully believe the synagogue of satan in the scripture, those who say they are jews but they lie, is referring to these people. you dont have to take my word for it, they act as Satan's agents through their actions. Every filth in the world, porn, usury, corruption, wars, are planned and executed by these satanist khazarian kikes, who claim they are jews but are not. we are living at a time where the khazarian mafia took control of the world and they are bringing forth the end of the world

>>15408
>The Jews of Jesus' time
Judeans, the citizens of the roman province Judea, weren't ethnically monogenic. There were both white and nordic Israelites and levantine wog Canaanites (mostly represented by Idumeans).
>Ashkenazim have european (mostly german) surnames
Because ashkenazi identity got formed in medieval Germany and then was locally influenced by other Europeans.
>They migrated from Khazaria
Actually from the Judean province itself like other Levantines. This is the reason why South Italy is so swarthy and middle-eastern.
>Satan's agent
They are the Satan. And Satan is simply a common noun, not a proper name for some fallen (insert the xitter chudjak joke here) angel.

rule 1: dont ask about Christianity on this site. It has a a lot of goofuses and if you are new, you will get confused.

rule 2: i can only recommend eastern orthodox channels that explain the faith on da tube. but generally speaking, take your sweet time to do research on this topic. We are talking thousands of years of theology (it wont take you 6 million years, but it will still take some time).

here is a one guy https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTT_woATX1ily5aH-nZYkYg . The editing style is a bit zoomer-type, but he does compress a lot of info in videos. Check out some of his playlists. There are also others, but i think you will find them eventually by proxy.

rule 3: this is also a great opportunity to learn a bit about critical thinking, epistemology, metaphysics and theory of knowledge. this is generally to separate fallacies paradigms from valid/sound ones. Khan Academy has a great course for the basics: https://www.khanacademy.org/partner-content/wi-phi

rule 2 and 3 are about learning what you dont know, so that you can go and check other materials.

>>15496
also these are not really rules, but suggestions, so im kms and forcing all of you to watch.

>>15496
We actually talked more about racism than theology

>>15498
lmao

>>15404
Just some word of advice OP
Almost any reason for conversion is valid but once you become a christian you need to understand that your religion is more important than your political views and anything else
remember that the priority is the church and it's teachings

>>15397
A very good starting point is Calvin's institute of the Christian faith, but it is a long book, if you feel like it just read the first chapter. I assist a reformed church so I believe the reformed confessions of faith and catechisms are the best source of information for lay people, I would recommend you to start reading the Scots confession (it is really based), the Westminster catechism and the Heidelberg catechism.

Godspeed.

>>15409
Ethnic Ashkenazim came from khazaria, the claim they are from southern Italy (ethnic messapians or Greeks or levantines or otherwise), is just a spurious claim for Ashkenazim to be grafted into „western" heritage, what happened to the Jewish Khanate of Khazaria? What happened to its jewish population? Why the sudden appearance of Jewish population in the frontier of the old Khanate?.

>>15525
>Ethnic Ashkenazim came from Khazaria, the claim they are from southern Italy (ethnic messapians or Greeks or levantines or otherwise), is just a spurious claim for Ashkenazim to be grafted into „western" heritage
Firstly, it's genetically traced that they are clustered with the South Italians. It doesn't mean they have a western heritage, it means the Moors have a jewish heritage
>What happened to Khazaria then???
It was just a bunch of turkic tribes converted through some edomite immigrants to Judaism, they hadn't ever migrated to Europe, also they were just a state-forming superstratum, nothing more.
>To its jewish population
Disappeared without a trace, because they were few in number and stuff.
>Why the sudden appearance of Jewish population in the frontier of the old Khanate?
Never happened.
<Brabant space or whatever we should use in such cases
Let me guess, you have read something of Charles Weisman? If I remember correctly, he was one of those Khazar theory supporters in the CI.

>>15525
Mostly ethnic Ashkenazis now live in the modern day Balkans (Serbia and Romania) but they are now christian converted and raped, at least the ones in Europe.

>>15541
Lied award