No.705
He's going soft on them, severe lapse in judgment. Let's hope it's not continues
No.714
I am thinking of just allowing names on /bant/. It is a bit annoying seeing too many names on /qa/.
No.716
>>715Alright, /qa/ and /q/ don't have name spaces. Only /bant/ has. Let's see how things go.
No.717
>rejecting the little pph you have
No.718
>>717a small price to pay for salvation
No.719
>>717didn't know that people cared that much about names on anonymouse IB sites.
Again, this change isn't perminant and could be reverted at any time. However, I think that very few people would actually see it as a bad thing.
No.721
>>720I said this unfortunately
No.723
so, the normal users end up being less active than the namefags and the best way to curb this is to remove the namefield?
No.724
>>723the normal users are active when there is shit to do/talk about/post OC. This site was made for zaryans and its not for some nametroons, who will ack themselfs because they can't tripcode anymore. Most of this niggers aren't even here because of the show, but because they were vanished by froot.
Just go use /bant/ if you really need people to know who you are 24/7.
No.725
>>724So you WONT complain once the only discussions in bant are namefag shit because other people arent talking there ?
No.726
>>725idk, its the only place left with a name tab. This place isn't made for all the outlaws of the sharty, who need to namefag 24/7, this is a place for zaryans.
No.729
this thread is literally anodda shoah. shame on the goyim..
No.733
>>724>>726TSMT, this isnt soyblog.discord
If these niggers want to talk to each other so much maybe they should go to cord or twitter. Theres infinite number of platforms for that kind of interaction, why are they so persistent in pushing it on anonymous image boards for niche interests (that they dont even fucking care for or talk about)?
Now namefagging is off the table, which is good now, but may prove to be annoying in the future (for example some OC maker or important whoever wants to tripfag so he doesnt get impersonated or to be clear its him, now he cant because the literallywho's forced its removal by being insufferable). Bottom line these people are parasites that only degrade the website
No.734
>>733> but may prove to be annoying in the futureone solution to the problem is to simply creat a speacial role that can't do anything but ignore the name restrictions. This role would be given to a few individuals who wish to share news about an OC, but dont want to be impersonated.
Of course, I can also just revert the changes back to how they used to be and we all make a gentlemen's agreement of using names and trip codes only when necessary.
No.777
>>734>gentlemen's agreementBut that't the issue in the first place, the nameniggers aren't gentlemen and need to be handled with an iron fist. Just look at joel, after the name field was removed he started namefagging with the fucking subject field (not even sure why replies have a subject field). And if that was removed he'd just sign his posts or something. These people are unabashed, stubborn and uncooperative. And that's why they're 'nished from everywhere they go AND that's why they're here, not because they like zellig but because they have no where else to go since no one else puts up with their shit
No.779
>>735Yeah, I think that I can add/enable this feature. I just need to find it in the files and test it out.
>>777I guess you are right. We could implement more rules regarding namefagging, signing posts ect.
Having a subject field in the replies section is usefull in cases where the thread covers a /general/ topic and you wish to make a "sub-thread" in it.
It's indeed sad that some people abuse the system. As I have mentioned, we shall do something about it.
No.781
>>779Add the feature and enable namefagging on /qa/ , if people dont like them they can just hide their posts by using the filter
No.790
>>779honestly zoot, this imageboard has been the kindest to me and my namefagging, but i guess im causing trouble again. tel me, should i just quit namefagginng on imageboards period? its getting tiring,, and besides, my parents already know of my shenanagins so there is not much of a point. im also banned from literaly every IP i could access (frotler rangebanned my mobile data and proxies!) so its probably over for me.
No.791
>>790I thought you were gone for personal reasons
No.792
>>790I recommend that you try and not namefag 24/7.
Personally, I don't have a problem with names when they are used correctly (for example when you are talking about an OC project long term or in my case when you are covering moderation topics), but it starts to get annoying when you are doing it all the time for no reason. The point of these forums is that you are anonymous (in most cases) and people don't like namefags, since it appears like they are seeking attention… for the sake of attention. If you wish for more "unhidden" interactions, there are already sites for that.
No.793
>>790Also I unironically liked talking to you so no
No.804
>>790please post your tummy my aryan princess
No.883
>>790you should kill yourself