No.6615
>>6613Vichan is literally open source this is nothing new GEEEEEEG
No.6619
>>6617Zarty haters this is your mindset
No.6621
>>6620whyd you censor soyzellig party
No.6622
>>6621to post the same picture on sharty and 'ru
No.6625
>>6620did he post using his gemcord account? it could be 0chan pedos fwiw
No.6626
>>6625Did you see the OP? It's totally them
They mess with source to spam 'p
No.6630
Idc if it came from /gem/cucks leaking source code is fucking keyed
No.6631
>>6630spamming cp isnt keyed
No.6633
>>6631This is obviously someone falseflagging them
who would spam cp and admit to who they are?
No.6634
>>6633Only /brim/kikes use linux
No.6635
>>6634you realize the user agents in the headers are spoofed, right?
No.6636
>>6613wtf why is it a gif when the filename clearly states it's a .png
No.6638
What happened was exactly what happened with kiwifarms, same perpetrators too.
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/security-breach-on-october-23rd-2025.231392/ No.6639
>>6638It's only technically the same, in both cases there was a public directory that was simply downloaded (so much for the KF "hack"), but vichan is already open source while xenforo isn't, and Null in his infinite retardation actually committed various credentials to the repository, which forced him to shut the website down for few hours and change them.
No.6641
>>6640>he didn't include any credentials on the repositoryAre you sure? You can just check for yourself:
https://soyjak.st/soy/thread/13701305.html>the zarty's vichan code is modifiedYeah, I wonder how much it will take them to learn that we do in fact have MPA
No.6642
>>6641>Yeah, I wonder how much it will take them to learn that we do in fact have MPAThis really isn't the own you think it is because you could just look at the files to see it's from the zarty.
The 'p poster was obviously trying to falseflag /gem/ because he doesn't like it. It could also easily be some jassy tranny or some other offsiter trying to falseflag the sharty in general
No.6643
>>6642What are you trying to disagree with?
>you could just look at the files to see it's from the zartyWho claimed otherwise and where?
>The 'p poster was obviously trying to falseflag /gem/ because he doesn't like it.Super obvious to everyone, just scroll through the thread.
>It could also easily be some jassy tranny or some other offsiter trying to falseflag the sharty in generalOr 0chan pedos.
No.6644
>What are you trying to disagree with?I disagree with this
>>6639>but vichan is already open source while xenforo isn'tbecause it doesn't matter if xenforo is closed source since you can obtain said source, and some parts of the zarty's leak were not public or open source.
>Super obvious to everyone, just scroll through the thread.if you truly believe someone from site x would go on site y to post child porn while saying they're from site x then you're an idiot. Also, the actual leak was over a month ago fyi
>Or 0chan pedos.I transgenderheart muh artificial boogeymen
No.6645
>>6644Now post your hand so I can know you are not a vantabrown shitskin from latinx america with negative reading comprehension.
>because it doesn't matter if xenforo is closed source since you can obtain said source, and some parts of the zarty's leak were not public or open source.the parts that leaked were 99% open source already, 1% SNCA because the pedophiles could not access inc/secrets.php.
>if you truly believe someone from site x would go on site y to post child porn while saying they're from site x then you're an idiot. Also, the actual leak was over a month ago fyiYou are genuinely retarded if that's what you think I claim happened.
>I transgenderheart muh artificial boogeymenYou are genuinely retarded 2.
No.6646
>>6645>the parts that leaked were 99% open source already, 1% SNCA because the pedophiles could not access inc/secrets.php. this doesn't matter you dumb hohol faggot you didn't even look at it, fun fact you really don't want instance-config.php or post.php leaked
you could argue null's case was also "snca" just because most of xenforo's code is easily accessible
>You are genuinely retarded if that's what you think I claim happened.then what do you claim happened, retard?
>You are genuinely retarded 2.htsm.png
No.6647
>>6646>fun fact you really don't want instance-config.php or post.php leakedOtherwise what happens? You have no idea what you are talking about.
>you could argue null's case was also "snca" just because most of xenforo's code is easily accessibleExcept for the credentials part.
>then what do you claim happened, retard? Learn English.
No.6649
>>6647>Otherwise what happens? You have no idea what you are talking about.I don't even need to explain this you're a retarded hohol
>Except for the credentials part.did you even read what null said about it?
>Learn English.Is it because you're too busy gooning to maya 'p or do you just not know what you're talking about?
No.6650
>>6649>Old versions of it had been committed.>I have rotated all credentials out of an abundance of caution.Learn to read already.
>I don't even need to explain this you're a retarded hoholYou can upload the code to ChatGPT if that helps you.
No.6652
>>6651Kys you russkie schweinehund
No.6653
Transylvania is rightfully Hungaryan
No.6656
>>6651One more post and Russia will become a real superpower
>>6653tsmt
No.6657
its brapbant in here
No.6658
>>6657IT'S HUNGARY IN HERE 🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺
No.6659
>>6632>>6631why did you faggots bring up something unrelated entirely to leaking source code and then bring up vichan? This is like if the sharty's source code got leaked and then you downplay it because oh vichan open-source. Shut up. I'm almost certain that over the years the developers have configured vichan, the source code probably even has that captcha code which is proprietary.
No.6660
>>6659>why did you faggots bring up something unrelated entirely to leaking source code and then bring up vichan?Why do you claim CP spam is unrelated even though it clearly is related?
>This is like if the sharty's source code got leakedIt could be if only the zarty had an obfuscated datamining software built in that many people tried really hard to deobfuscate in order to ban evade and spam CSAM and gore. As far as I know the zarty has MPA, image hashbanning (keyed) and captcha. Not a good analogy, try again.
No.6663
>>6662>>6661Stupid retard it got slid by fpe spam
No.6666
>>6665Bane and Zellig won
FPEdos lost
No.6669
>>6660>unrelatedokay fair enough the people behind cp might also have done that but the main point of this thread was source code.
>zarty dataminingthe captcha is proprietary, we have the captcha's source code from this leak now. Now make the damn thing work on Pale Moon even McCaptcha works on it you fags.
No.6670
>>6661I archived it.
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/QMTyvWhy are we so mad at a source code leak.
>inb4 it's open source>inb4 they spammed cpTo make a point, take how Dobkun, who is an annoying schlogcuck failtroll, however, he was the one who showed mousegram. Just because bad people revealed something doesn't invalidate that. You can still hate them while still being glad that thing has been revealed.
No.6671
>>6670also why I was slightly annoyed at how defensive you are, I have to say, fair enough. Nusois think where the fuggen pedoes when we're not, it's just that people unfortunately fall through the cracks and I hate to see those people be the ones to paint this site in a negative light, and we're tolerated on the Sharty so it makes sense we would try to defend the dutch women show with a side of bald men with glasses.
No.6672
>>6671shit meant while instead of why fuck
No.6673
>>6642>jassy trannyI think your right in the fact that the idea of /gem/ spamming 'p is like when 8moepedoes call the sharty pedoes and 'p spammers. Maybe the chinny idfk definitely something else, I doubt some bad shartybrap would spam it or something to that effect
No.6674
>>6673the kind of people who would pay mone to the sharty to self insert as a soy wojack wearing a hoodie are mentally stunted and i wouldn't put it past them. they have taken credit for ddosing the zarty on the /gem/ board multiple times and they were talking about the "MPA system" in the /qa/ thread of the source code leak before the cp banlog screenshots came out and 99% of people dont even know what mpa means
No.6676
>>6674I think everyone knows what MPA is… right?
>>6675Quotesissies? Our response?
No.6677
>>6676i didn't know what mpa was until this thread. idk why a namefag spammer (who spams about loving quote) would break character and randomly talk about the mpa being disabled before the 'p spam banlogs were even posted, and in the banlogs the 'p spammer talks about the same shit like the mpa and loving quote.
i think its clearly this sharty poster who spammed 'p and was quick to be in the source leak thread (he doesnt have many posts that show in the sharty search) so they're all probably in a discord or something. how would he even know the mpa shit is disabled why would a hostile user be browsing the zarty constantly and just happens to see 'p which is so rare
No.6678
>>6669>>6670>>6671you are weird, why are you so obsessed with making this pedo event bigger than it is?
>muh zarty datamining>muh proprietary captchaand what are the implications other than that on various snca splinters development will suddenly get faster?
No.6679
>>6678idk I think the leak is cool and yes muh proprietary captcha, niggas make this shit run on Pale Moon, Christ.
No.6680
>>6679but faggots are trying to make it look as if something was REVEALED, some dark zarty secrets while it's only a bunch of features made to make child porn spamming slightly harder leaked by people who wanted to spam child porn, i swear to God everything in the shitsphere is about child porn, imageboard culture is centered around child porn just like amerimutt culture is centered around niggers