/q/ - The Zarty

wordswordswords the left can't meme

Total Demoralizer Death

Ive only been banning the obsessed dutchlarper massadoniekike (foenkie btw) because he comes here everyday just to bait/demoralize in any way possible. I havent deleted any posts though, ill talk with the team

>>3691
i think what OP is getting at is that in the eyes of the jannies a lot more people seem to be "obsessed dutchlarper massadoniekike (foenkie btw)", there seems to be multiple people being caught in the shotgun blast that shouldn't be. >(you) post any /co/ screenshot, you are banned, you try to understand studio massa in any way instead of spreading pure hatred, you are banned. it's threatening the right to free speech and conversation of the site. are we really better than them if we too turn ourselves into a platform where if you don't agree with our hugbox vision, you are banned immediately and permanently?

>>3692
then why all this "multiple people" have always 0 post history? And are in the same dutch/west german location as seen in the ban log?
>post any /co/ screenshot
No it is only for the 1 screenshot that is used to strawman whole ongezellig commnunity as obsessed with every step that massa does, even though most of community, at least on the zarty already moved on from obsessing about massa and only talks about him occassionally
>you try to understand studio massa in any way instead of spreading pure hatred
Again, its not just understanding massa in any way but one person obsessively saying again and again in different threads that massa is at the top, fanbase will never surpass him and that everyone in the community is supposedly obsessed about massa even though discussions about him are very limited
<dutch cartoon space
You are obsessively lying about what fandom does to force your ideas, bump threads infected by you again and again and then ban evade with vpns with 0 post history

>>3692
>there seems to be multiple people being caught in the shotgun blast that shouldn't be.
The thing you want but are too shy to ask for is datamining, unless this is some kind of "no take, only throw" situation in which there is an expectation to ban the ban evaders, but without being able to check if someone is actually ban evading.

>>3692
trvthnvke, overmoderation will choke out the website.

Its actually Zoot leaking here, because all his mods and jannies left from him.
Even sharty i can say "fuck you froot" and nothing will happen to me.
Literally theribbitrally

It's just a matter of whether the zarty will go down the shemmy's route, or will retain its initial effortpost and exclusive nature. Not everyone will be happy with moderation, welcome to the real world of trade-offs and contradictory demands issued by separate groups of people.

>>3698
Zoot is more ESL doebeit

>>3699
Sometimes he uses a translator, so who knows

>>3697
Censorship is gay and will lead to a gay website (like reddit)
Half the site is just xitter/reddit/tiktok/discord screenshots as is, if we start banning people for "demoralizing" or "baiting" we will only further stagnate the website
If you want to talk about the "initial exclusivity" you're barking at the wrong tree. Baiters and demoralizers WERE a part of the initial userbase. If you want the place to retain it's "initial exclusivity" you need to ban everyone who joined in the last year and ensure only the original userbase remains (of which there is probably 4 people total)

>>3701
The site will be boring without them.

>>3701
I'm not a leftist so I'm against forcing the users to integrate with 2-3 mentally ill obsessed spammers. This is not a "refugees welcome" website and I genuinely don't know how you got the idea it is. It's not about censorship too, it's basic social hygiene, 99% of posters are not negatively impacted by banning the obsessed spammers simply because it's not them who get banned. And actually there were multiple requests, reports and even mails asking for the clean-up, so you are the minority.

>>3702
>>3704
lets keep discussion unless its "me throw shit at zellignigger" type of deal

>>3707
but dont outright delete/ban it

>we need to let the shitters in otherwise the Zarty will not survive
Ironically it did because truecel Zaryans were and are the userbase, if you want to see what happens when the opposite happens, just check the shemmy

As a nufag I do have to say that I really enjoyed janny work on banning obsessesed niggers who tried to derail and bait for drama under that wholesome le mental health thread two weeks ago. Despite having short post history I have not been caught in any shotgun blasts so I think jannies are doing good work on the Total Demoralizer Death operation

>>3711
Total NewZaryan Life

>>3710
geg, but it has nothing to do with him, it's just obsessed shemmy/chinnyshits leaking all over the place

>>3704
>I genuinely don't know how you got the idea
I got it from the site itself as that's how it always operated. Banning people for "demoralizing" or "baiting" is unprecedented. Since the beginning of the website, the only thing that was banned was frogposting, and even that's a joke as it's a ban only on the images. The only other time people would get banned was during raids. I mean do you not remember pingasman? Shitflinging and baiting is at the core of the free internet experience. I understand why all the reeltrannies would want everything on the site curated for their mindless consumption, but as for the rest of us I think we can handle the lolcow tier "demoralization"
>It's not about censorship too, it's basic social hygiene
Most kike-coded sophistry ever posted on the website

>sage in the op
Do demoraltrannies really? GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEG