No.4865
>>4854apologies for accusing you, it's just that he has been spamming porn and immediately archiving it, the soylita post of today was also his.
No.4866
Lewis Carroll would be a better analogy than Roman Polanski
No.4867
>>4866literal who vs figurative someone
No.4868
>>4864i've never used /co/, how long does it take to acclimatize to being a pedo?
No.4869
>>4854>drawn Maya having sex with a child, and that didn’t stop people from continuing to enjoy his artso people were less outraged by maya raping a kid? Whatever could cause this double standard (oh nonono, orwellbros are we shotafags???)
No.4870
>>4868Never if you're normal, instantaneously if your skin is the color of coal
No.4871
>>4869well there were no genitalia in the pic
No.4872
>>4869is maya having sex with a kid exaggarated heavily? the most i saw was a maya demon with hands coming out of it grabbing a kid
No.4873
>>4872no, there was an unambiguous one of her embracing him with her legs spread
No.4875
>>4872I don't remember exactly, but there was intercourse drawn.
Anyways, our values evolve over time we no longer tolerate this kind of behavior.
No.4877
>>4876except they never said that in 1984 though
No.4878
>>4876Grim has always been our enemy. We have always hated Grim. We have always bannes Grim art
No.4881
>>4879they NEVER said that, stop your investigations chud
No.4883
[°°°]'s art has never been posted on Zarty. [°°°]'s actions have never been discussed on Zarty. Zaryans have no knowledge on who [°°°] is. [°°°] has no influence on our past and future
No.4889
>>4888Geg I actually typed it, but the new autofilter must have ruined my pun
No.4890
Zoot free us from these delusional people, delete this thread before their delusions and hatred towards ZartyThink spreads
No.4897
Still cares about pedophile award
No.4899
>>4786>NOOOOO STOP HANGING MY FAVORITE UNDERAGED GIRLObvious grim is obvious
No.5087
>>>/zellig/76960has the ban on Grim’s art been lifted?
No.5088
>>5087It was never enforced in the first place
No.5504
if Massa gets outed as a bad person will this entire site have to get deleted because you can't post art made by bad people? banning art not because of it's content but because of the identity of the artist is ridiculous.
No.5505
>>5504It certainly would be an interesting situation!
No.5506
>>5504if massa drew agugu 'p we would truly all get demoralized and die out forever
No.5507
>>5504You can always separate the art from the artist o algo
No.5516
>>>/zellig/87326 has the ban on Grim's art been lifted?
No.5517
>>4595the mods never gave an explanation for why this was necessary or how it'd improve the site. i can only assume that these actions were purely performative and an attempt by the moderators to demonstrate how 'moral' they are.
No.5658
you don't have to bring back the Grim threads, you can just unban his work. if you don't want an entire thread dedicated him, then fine, but people should be allowed to post his art in relavant threads. for example, if he makes Coco art, people should be allowed to post it in the Coco thread.
No.5660
The user above me uses /co/ if it matters
No.5661
>>5658>>5659Why do you want xhem unbanned anyway? what's wrong with keeping xeir art contained in the grimcord?
No.5662
Grim drew the girls naked again not that long ago if you check /co/ archive
The zarty doesn't need him nor his """art""" anyways
No.5676
Why the fuck is this thread cyclical?
No.5680
>>5676a mod deleted it then it was brought back
No.5805
>>>/zellig/95559
has the ban on Grim's art been lifted?
No.5806
>>5805I'm aware of every time you've asked this. Grim threads are in fact banned. You can only post his non-brimstone art in already existing art dump threads, but not make dedicated threads about him.