>>16883>The levant niggers were NOT white lol!That's it, that's true. The nuance is that Abrahamic nations are related to the BBC (Bell Beakers) colonizer settlers who appeared in the region during the bronze age. If there were no Whites there, there's also wouldn't been been their genetic traces we see in the iron age populations of Canaan (see my previous threads on the topic
>>>/brabant/16001).
>The biggest racial group of your so called white teligion are niggersWe, the Europeans, the initial Christians did so. It's our fault we fell for universalism and communism.
>if you care about your ethnicity, embrace your old pagan religions!! They had ethnicity at their base!!They did not, actually. There's no racial questions brought up in your pagan myths. In fact, they even propagate racemixing (many gods are literally a mixture of different mythical species including humans),and the most important part, many european paganisms are rooted in mesopotamian cults, for many European nations are Israelites in exile (for example, Celts' literal god Bel is literally Baal). Paul says to Israelite Romans:
<For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, (even) his everlasting power and divinity; that they may be without excuse: because that, knowing God, they glorified him not as God, neither gave thanks; but became vain in their reasonings, and their senseless heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God for the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts unto uncleanness, that their bodies should be dishonored among themselves: for that they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile passions: for their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature: and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due. (Romans 1:20-27)So the conclusion is: paganism is degenerate, often mixed in origin, and undeniably leads to homosexualism. Not very trad&based of your side.
>99% of your ancestors followed pagan bullshit!However, most Europeans descend from Abraham in many different ways. Overall, the Galatian Celto-Germans via their Cimmero-Scythian ancestors (
>>>/brabant/16447 + picrel) must be considered as fully Israelite peoples. Also must be kept in kind that the ancient Goths had intermingled with the early Proto-Slavs through the Wielbark, Przeworsk (I guess?) and probably even Zarubinets cultures, archeologically Germanic areas in the land which then produced Slavs (the Prague-Korchak culture) in the end of Antiquity. This makes Slavs originally partially Germanic and through those Germanics partially Israelite (Czechia_Breclav_EMA.SG has got 18,1% of Sweden_Skane_IA.SG). Thus, the Völkerwanderung is ultimately the fulfillment of the prophecy that the white Adamic nations should be brought into the Covenant and Salvation through intermixing with the descendants of Abraham and incorporation into his "seed". All White nations today have either the Slavic or the Germanic/Celtic admixture, and it has been like this for more than a millenia. So what does this all have to do with your claim? It all means your ancestors were actually Israelites (not only them tho) and they believed in YAH and you are their legitimate offspring. Remember 1 Cornthians 10:1-4. Your allegedly "pagan" ancestors couldn't have been with Moses and Christ if they weren't Israelites.
>this abrahamic virus destroys cultures! Le bad!The real Western, European culture that is common for all the Whites began with the Christianization of the Germanic tribes and their interaction with the preceding peoples of the fallen Roman Empire and the Roman culture. Everything in this statement is about Nordics if you haven't noticed: the only reason these ancient Hellens (Dorians), Romans and others were so successful is because of the Nordic migrations which ennobled the local peoples by introducing Northern European admixtures into their genome. As the Germanics and Celts, who were only "savages" due to the punishment given by God, were purer in this regard than the aforementioned "architects of civilization", they surpassed them in their own paths when integrated. Read Strabo:
<…This is clearly indicated by the way of life now established among them (Galatians in Massalia); for all cultured people have turned to the art of eloquence and to philosophical pursuits; therefore, while the city has only recently become a school for the education of barbarians, it has converted the Galatians into such friends of Hellenism that they even compose their documents in Greek; at present the city has induced the noblest Romans, who are eager for knowledge, to come here to study instead of travelling to Athens. The Galatians, seeing these men, and at the same time enjoying the benefits of the world, willingly devote their leisure to this way of life, not only individuals, but the whole community; in every case they receive sophists, some of whom they employ on private account, while others are paid the city's public salary, just as physicians are… (Geographica 4:1:5)The citation for my take on the birth of authentic Europe:
<The center of gravity of historical development was no longer in the Mediterranean region, but from now on, Europe had its own center, which over the centuries only slightly shifted from the Rhineland to the center of Germany. The continent now had all the prerequisites to become an independent spatial unit: it had its own center of gravity, a unified racial basis, and a growing sense of community.<What lay at the basis of the young European sense of community, apart from Charlemagne's forcible political unification of Europe? When the Germanic tribes invaded the Mediterranean world, they encountered three spiritual forces with which they had to deal: the cultural heritage of antiquity, Christianity, and the Romance peoples with their distinctive social and spiritual character. While the German ruling classes gradually merged with the Romance element by blood, they simultaneously adopted the Christian faith, which, however, was largely imbued with their own views. Moreover, they came into contact with the cultural heritage of antiquity, parts of which still survived and played a significant role in the formation of the new culture of Europe. Thus, this triad: the young German-Roman people (the Slavic peoples joined later), Christianity, which was initially largely German in character, and the intellectual heritage of antiquity became the foundation on which the internal unity of young Europe was born. Moreover, the global political confrontation between the Eastern Byzantine Empire, on the one hand, and the Arab Caliphate, on the other, made the emerging European nations aware of their cohesion with each other for the first time. (SS-Hauptamt - Lehrplan für die weltanschauliche Erziehung in der SS und Polizei, 1943/44) The verdict: There should had been no Europe if not Christianity, "which was initially Germanic in character".
I'll perhaps continue the commentary because the post seems too long to write it further