No.16001
Two scenarios of admixtures of the local population in northern Canaan, one without the Western European component and one with it. The probability of the first scenario, which assumes the local indigenism of the population, is very low (P-Value: 0.187). The probability of the second scenario, which assumes the influence of Western European migrants, is much higher, almost 100% (P-Value: 0.933).
* The indigenist scenario is currently an academic consensus established by (((local scientists))) from the (((edomite))) state of (((Israel))), who have rejected previous hypotheses about European migrations to the Middle East:
>Material-culture historians such as G.E. Wright, K. Kenyon, R. Amiran and M. Kochavi, struck by ceramic changes effected at the end of the EB III and visualizing them as the product of migration and invasion, sought out terms that would express the transitional nature of the ensuing period: “EB IV–MB I”, “Intermediate EB–MB”, and “Intermediate Bronze Age”. Olga Tufnell, who also favored INVASION AS THE PRIME MOVER IN CULTURAL CHANGE, linked the “Intermediate EB–MB” to the European “Beaker Folk” and to Egypt’s First Intermediate Period, while coining the term “Caliciform Culture” for the period in question. The processual reaction to cultural–historical archaeology, embraced by local and anglophone researchers of the 1970s and 1980s in the Levant, included a healthy measure of indigenism; insisting that CHANGE WAS INTERNALLY or systemically MOTIVATED UNLESS PROVEN OTHERWISE, many archaeologists adopted the term “EB IV”.
No.16046
So Jesus wasn't white?
No.16052
>>16046>>16047>>16051white people didnt exist back then doe
No.16053
>>16052yes, romans, celts were green back in those days
No.16057
>>16054(((they))) are hiding the truth
No.16058
>>16057have you tried finding it?
No.16081
>>16051What is this post about?
>>16053>white>no scandinavians, saxons, franks mentioned No.16082
>>16081This post proves the migration of Western Europeans from the Bell Beaker Culture to the Middle East through recording a demographical change in the aforementioned region, which leads us to the further researches on why Abraham wasn't a (((Jew))) but a White colonist whose descendants were all as White as him (a Nordic European).
No.16165
Is 10% european the standard for white now.
No.16166
>>16165no, where did you hear about this?
No.16170
>>16165No, it shows that local populations that mixed with social outcasts from Israelite society had white admixtures and this leads to conclusion that the Israelites were white.
No.16174
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitannithis minor steppe probably comes from sintashta/indo-aryan related peoples, not bell-beakers.
No.16175
>>16174Mitanni people didn't have WHG component which is introduced through the population which also increased WSH in local Levantine populations, therefore it's false. Also, Mitanni score 0.121 P-Value on QpAdm, it's an unlikely scenario. The most likely scenario we have it's the Bell Beakers admixing locals and that scored 0.933 P-Value and thus this hypothesis is the most likely out of any.
No.16176
Also R1-related haplogroups that appeared through the population which gave the admixture were predominantly R1b and still shared among modern Western Europeans, whereas the Sintashta and Indo-Iranians were R1a peoples
No.16180
>>16175Any studies on the haplogroups in ancient Israel?
No.16181
Thoughts on this outlier sample from 1500BC? Scores 25%-ish Yamna-like ancestry.
https://www.exploreyourdna.com/sample/israel/i10100I10100,0.101303,0.110693,-0.035449,-0.001938,-0.016618,-0.006136,0.010105,-0.014769,-0.029247,-0.012210,0.007307,-0.008393,-0.000743,-0.017478,0.018187,0.009414,-0.002999,0.003041,0.019860,-0.004252,-0.009109,0.011623,-0.000863,0.003133,-0.000718
No.16183
>>16181Most likely it's an Abrahamic-admixed individual with partially, you know, Abrahamic ancestry (though it should've shown some WHG ancestry which is plausibly absorbed by ANF). Additionally, let's remember there's 27% Steppe-like component in Aleppo Syrians, so the sample just represents a case of a recent mixed marriage among a Northern European-related individual with a local Canaanite individual which then produced the sample individual (mamzer).