Recently I decided to delve into the history of European nations, in particular their origins, in order to create a well grounded hierarchy between them (or, to be more precise, to justify the already visible hierarchy). It would seem that the first thing that's obvious is the superiority of the Northern Europe over the Southern. There could be no problems with this, since the North and South are distinguished by different dominant components, the steppe Aryan and the farmer Mediterranean. Be that as it may, everything is constantly changing, and throughout history Europe has undergone many changes, the main one being the replacement of the North-South dichotomy with West-East. More precisely, the emergence of the last, since the first hasn't disappeared anywhere, but remains.
It's known that North-Western Europe and the origin associated with it presupposes a higher intelligence. Thus, the first division of Europe should be the following — North and South. First, let's deal with the South. Here everything is very simple — the white population of the Western Mediterranean contains fewer non-White (and more basically Mediterranean) components in themselves than their eastern relatives from, let's say, mainland Greece.
Now that everything about Southern Europe is known, it would be worth moving on to Northern Europe. Here, everything becomes much more complicated in understanding racial reality.
As I have already noted, it's namely the North-Western Europeans who intellectually come to the forefront of their race, while North-Eastern Europe and the origins associated with it lag behind in their cognitive abilities of the brain (although they're still higher than Southern Europe, but nonetheless). The first thing, we could connect this with, is the (genetic) location of the Celto-Germanics of North-Western Europe in the "ideal center" between the three main White genetic components of the Paleolithic, Neolithic, and the Pontic steppe. However, such an "ideal and balanced combination", even coupled with the absence of non-White admixtures (with the exception, perhaps, of the Boer-Afrikaners, although it's not quite correct to bring them as an example), couldn't explain this difference. To understand the context of the situation, I'll simply clarify that Asiatic and Saami-like admixtures are relatively widespread among Eastern Europeans (in particular, Balto-Slavics), but not only does any significant percentage of them come from the Finno-Ugrics (a
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.