I've been seeing this holywar pic frequently while being online on various imageboards. Even having not known the actual state of things I always laughed at this delusional piece of jeetophrenia and judeodeceivement. But now, when I know the subject well enough, I can dismantle every single piece of nonsense depicted here.
So, first what we see, is this misleading title of an article that has nothing to do with the topic of ANE. Its content is actually about how the paleolithic proto-Europeans (Vestonice, Sunghir, Kostenki, El-Miron and Goyet-Q2 clusters) got the non-WE paternal lineages, and it's known¹ that they were mixed with IUP basal Eurasians which were more like modern East and South Asians. That means the pajeet who was the author of this abomination of infographics directly lied right to (You)r face. Also to (You)r information, the original Caucasoids aka Western Eurasians (WE) were genetically similar to the future WHG cluster of Villabruna. Which is notable, they (I mean the Villabruna sample itself) had the R1 haplotype too, meaning it's not obligatory to us to think that the R1 lineages among modern Europeans are derived from ancient East Asians, as it's plausible that they all could have carried some unique haplogroups for their populations. This circumstance nullifies the rapebaby take.
The second lie we face here, is the modeling which says that the ANE were allegedly 22% Eastern Eurasian (EE). If you'll read the text attached to that claim, you'll see these results are applied to the Yana RHS population which wasn't identical to people we know as the ANE. Therefore, what we see can be fairly considered to be nothing but intellectual fraud. Traditionally, both ANE and Dzudzuana-AHG-ANF are being modeled as 1/4 non-WE and 3/4 WE, but I've seen a qpAdm model which scored 9% of non-WE (that's to say, of a Basal Eurasian component, in this very case) for the latter population that is associated with modern Southern Europeans. I can assume that would be also fair enough to extrapolate this experience onto the ANE. However, academic modelations are too variable to be convinced in any of those. The only substantial fact is obvious for us is that both South-European-associated ancient Anatolians and their relatives were equally White compared to Ancient North Eurasians and their relatives (Western Siberian Hunter-Gatherers, the "Tarim mummies").
Another example of how deceitful this brilliant bait is, is the Eurogenes K13 breakdown of
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.