/qa/ - Question & Answer

From what I gathered, jartycucks hate zellig even more than the current sharty administration

>>595
This is true. I remmember when Doll shut down the sharty. A few zaryans, including me, went to the jarty. We weren't really welcomed by some of the inhabitants there.
I had a hole debate over some idiot about what is an IAS and what is a NAS and how zellig should not be posted (we were on /qa/ - random).

>>590
They literally moved every single zellig thread on /qa/ into one single containment one, even the fucking no.1 get. Also on their wiki they let furries hallucinate shit about da cord and massa being muslim or some shit. The jarty is absolutely inhospitable and I still havent forgiven them for what they did months back on the sharty. I still remember. Fuck the jarty, fuck lute, fuck the cp spammers and discord shills they had to get people on that godforsaken website

>>596
Hey I actually remember reading that entire debate after it happened! It shaped my understanding of what IAS really is, but the other guy was as dense as a fucking brick wall

>>598
I am happy that you remember the misery that was the thread, veteranfag. No wonder their site is dead.
Anyways, at this point the original criteria of what is a IAS has been lost. Anything can pass as an IAS nowadays…

>>590
jartytards lost

>>595
>>596
Don't they run on a more laissez-faire approach im comparison to the discord server the 'sharty currently is? Why not then force our way in and through our resilience stay there permanently?
<
Why should we expect to be welcomed warmly when our biggest detractors are the common 'sharty /soy/ users that refuse to intrude on /qa/ because of "zellig trannies"? Our independence as a group has been achieved with the 'zarty's founding, but our place and recognition on soy websites must be earned daily and this is how it's always been since the /qa/, it's how certain groups from that era went extinct after the /qa/ and how others came into existence post-/qa/, and so to discard the 'jarty all together due to the most basic resistance seems to me is unindicative of what we should aim to be should we wish to remain.

>>708
Ermmmmm… It's not that basic >>597

>>708
they're stuck up and arrogant, they'd never allow us. And turning our back on sharty would only prove the common /soy/ antizelliger right