Question & Answer

>>20589
Maya always make things better

you are not a femcel doe

>>20590
This is trve. I always found her relatable since I'm a social retard (evendoebeit I somehow have friends), so I guess I like feeling heard of zoiets.

>>20592
I am in fact a man.

You have to go back

apparently femcels do exist but I'm still pretty sure (at least 94% sure) they do not exist.

>>20597
If they do exist, they're probably just as reclusive as incels.

>>20596
Marge

>>20589
maya 'ralds are always nice to look at

>>20600
I've contemplated artfagging for a while, so maybe I could draw Maya to ease my woes.

>>20598

>>20597
femcels only exist because they can't get chad

>>20589
theres always a light at the end of the tunnel ou algo

>>20603
counter argument.

>>20604
maya in onesie wabag

>>20604
True, everything in my life has been falling apart since the start of September. But I know that God will still be there for me; religion is the only thing that fulfills me at this point.

>>20605
MWABAA (Maya Will Always Be An Aryan)

>>20608
HFWBRAHEWBB

>>20609
meaning?

>>20610
(IKFES)

>>20610
thats just agugu making baby sounds

>>20612
Ugh. Again with the aguguposter derailing every thread

Just keep this forced unfunny brimstone in /drenthe/ and lock it there.

summoning my friend agugulee to crack jokes with me on the zarty

what does "HFWBRAHEWBB" and "(IKFES)" mean?

>>20613
This isn't even me.

Ugh. Agugu posters are so obsessed they have to pretend to be me in order to keep their forced brimstone alive.

You are so pathetic and boring.

Agugu poster and agugulee are the new 2 irl friend cord now

>>20616
geg i couldnt tell

Holy derailment.

>>20597
Femcels are untermenschen btw

>>20628

>>20628
>fem
>menschen

>implies femcels exist
KEK do nuzaryans really?

>>20631
femcels in theory could, but there's no proof.

>>20636
Cord nigger

>>>20636
>Cord nigger

>>20639
I don't use the 'cord though

>>>20639
>I don't use the 'cord though

spin-troon.gif Cord woke up

>>20636
even a 0/10 foid can easily get a 7/10 man but sub5 men dont get shit because foids refuse to settle for their looksmatch
>The 80/20 rule, or "Pareto principle", comes from economics and refers to the observation that the top 20% men mate with 80% of women, but the remaining 20% of women do not mate with the bottom 80% men.
>An internal OkCupid study from 2009 revealed that women irrationally evaluate 80% of men, brave enough to show their mug on a public website, as below medium (below 5/10).[2]https://archive.fo/489UV

>>20644
I'm sub5 and mymy my queen settled for me ama

>>20645
WaifuGODding is aryan though

>>20646

>>20644
>even a 0/10 foid can easily get a 7/10 man but sub5 men dont get shit because foids refuse to settle for their looksmatch
Wigga go outside and watch how other people live. It's terrible how ugly people are in couples with the beautiful, and both roles are quite uniformly adopted by both men and women. There's hardly a disproportion.
>A hook-up app did a study based on their users
Irrelevant source. The sampling is non-representative. Most of normies doesn't use such apps to get a gf/bf.
TLDR incel culture is a part of the pop-culture degeneracy trends and is entirely anti-White and anti-Christian. Thou shalt never cause misandry nor misogyny.

>>20648
Most ideological incels are racemixxed beyond repair, that's why they can't get sex.

>>20648
>>20650
hypergamy is universal female behaviour, has nothing to do with race
>anti-Christian
>degeneracy
>thou
SNCA tradcath larp

>>20653
They don't reproduce. Self-solving problem.

>>20654
lmao get a load of this faggot
low SMV men don't reproduce but low SMV women do
eugenics will never work out because men will never stop reproducing with low quality women
(You) are guilty of picrel

>>20655
Conservative women have the highest fertility (obviously). Man-hating feminists etc. have only cats and dogs. Whatever delusions you have about low quality women having tons of children with high quality men are false and not based on any available data.

>>20656
>Conservative women have the highest fertility (obviously). Man-hating feminists etc. have only cats and dogs.
picrel
>Whatever delusions you have about low quality women having tons of children with high quality men are false and not based on any available data.
literally every single stat i posted shows its true albeit

>>20658
fixed

>>20657
>picrel
That's exactly how I know you have no idea what you are talking about.

>>20660
>The extension of the 80/20 Rule, is the 64/4 Rule and the 51/1 Rule, or "Two-thirds of women will chase the top 4% of men" and "Half of all women will chase the top 1% of men". This is borrowed from research on management optimization and Agile Development, where work characteristics are ranked based on impact. (https://www.timewax.com/blog/the-80-20-rule-in-project-resource-planning/, https://www.vthink.com.au/single-post/2017/08/18/the-644-principle)
>To paraphrase FastCompany (https://www.fastcompany.com/3069049/beyond-the-80-20-rule-this-formula-might-make-you-rethink-time-management), "A Time" is 0.8% of effort for 51.2% of results (256XD), "B Time" is 3.2% effort for 12.8% of time (16XD), "C Time" is 16% of effort for 16% of time (4XD), "D Time" is 20% of the work for 80% of the time (1 XD). In the case of the Blackpill, Face and Height would be A Time (Genetics), Looks and Frame (Things that can be Maxxed) would be B Time, Status and Game (Redpill) would be C Time, Bluepill strategies would be D Time.
But keep coping and telling yourself how youre a based antiracemixing rabbi yeshua bar yosef worshipper

>>20589
thread derailed by a blackpill psyop. DNI, SHUT IT DOWN

>>20662
geg for a retard that insists on having the last word you sure did quit quickly
next time bring your own statistics to disprove mine

>>20613
>>20616
<MY
<
<REDDIT
<
<spAAACING!!!!

>>20662
thats aryan nuzartycuck
OP was blogposting so its not like we "ruined" a good thread anyway

>>20665
OP here, this is trve. It's a blogpost so it doesn't really matter if it gets detailed as long as it isn't niggardly topics.

>>20664
Those are not reddit. I mean, it's 4cuck spacing, if speaking more precisely. No gaps between paragraphs are the actual reddit thing if you think about it.

>>20653
>spamming with literally-what diagrams and stats
SNCA cherry-picking which represents absolutely nothing.
>tradcath larp detected
I can say I despise catholix and even more the eastern orthodox but what's really important is that you're on the same side with the schweinehunden like Elliot Rodger and other racemixed mongrels which says for itself. Idk, breakdown your delusional data by race anyway, I don't want to talk about nons as I don't care about these ugly and cruel beasts, whom you mimic so good. This "it's all da shiksas- I MEAN (white) women!" agenda is entirely jewish. And your entire understanding of women, men, and how they interact with each other comes solely from (((porn))) and (((their))) folklore, or, at best, from persons whose faces are the most accurate image of the 56% percent meme. Go fuck a goat, like a proud """masculine""" mudslim, if you hate your own women this much, wigger.
>Woomeen le bad... cuz they act like me, for women repeat after men due to their conformism, but they are still to blame for all

>>20668
>>20666
>>20665
>>20664
>>20663
>>20663
>>20662
>>20661
>>20660
>>20659
>>20657
>>20656
>>20655
>>20654
>>20653
>>20650
>>20648
>>20647
>>20646
>>20645
>>20644
>>20643
>>20642
>>20641
>>20640
>>20639
>>20636
>>20631
meds+pls shower

>>20668
its not cherrypicking just because you dont believe or understand it. its actually a pretty general phenomenon that also applies to this specific case of male-female relationships. your personal incredulity doesnt invalidate data
>This "it's all da shiksas- I MEAN (white) women!" agenda is entirely jewish
because women are all innocent little angels who can do no wrong, theyre just brainwashed by DA JOOS, right?
i literally never said anything specifically about white women, i just said women in general are hypergamous. youre the one being a pissbaby chudcel and attacking me with adhominem insults about my race and religion

Mayafags are also nazis now as if it couldn't get any worse

>>20671
tsmt this obsessed faggot has been sperging out about race, muslims and jews supposedly conspiring up anti-christian plots since his first reply while i never ever mentioned any of those things up until now

nazi site

>>20673
youll grow up

>>20670
>because women are all innocent little angels who can do no wrong, theyre just brainwashed by DA JOOS, right?
Oh yes! Both white men and women brainwashed by (((them))), and you can't force women be different from men, so start with the men. The original sin is when Adam left his wife Eve, and if it didn't happen, Eve wouldn't have been deceived by the (((serpent))). This is how the world works. And concerning your words towards my alleged incredulity, dating apps don't represent the whole society. Not to mention that their target audience must be initiatally degenerate to even use such stuff. Most of the normies aren't that goytcattle'd to use these apps, hear me?
>i literally never said anything specifically about white women, i just said women in general are hypergamous
There's no such a thing as "women in general". There's no "we" but in general". They are not "we". We are we, not they.
>youre the one being a pissbaby chudcel and attacking me with adhominem insults about my race and religion
So you're a bruin goatfucker? Or you're accusing me of insulting my own race? Holy schizo, cease your faggotry already. Your own shitstats show a "change" since the 1950s, so your words aren't even sincere but a copypast that finds a response inside of your filthy heart. Degenerate.
>meh the puritan witch-hunter is moralfagging
YES I AM, and I am disgusted of your filth. What is that? The abominations of Canaan? Only browns can build their lives around it, and in 99% of times exactly they are those who do so. The only thing that I'm saying that everything that is important to the incels is surreal. All the data is false and all the conclusions are speculations, and all the topics they're into aren't present in the real world. Their heads are filled with an obscure loser mythology that's posed by them as having something to do with reality BUT IT DOESN'T. That's not real Nazism, that's not even racist, every aspect of inceldom is against each of the principles of White nationalism. I merely can't express my entire hatred of this phenomenon so I'm just giving up. Your pride with your blindness is simply blinding me and I'm forgetting how to type. Fuck this shit and you personally. Find some morality, you underman.

>>20672
Ofc I'm talking about it, because all that stuff is at least real, while the "women don't want to have sex with me WAAAAAAH" conspiracy is only inside your head

>>20675
>because women are all innocent little angels who can do no wrong, theyre just brainwashed by DA JOOS, right?
<Oh yes! Both white men and women brainwashed by (((them))), and you can't force women be different from men, so start with the men. The original sin is when Adam left his wife Eve, and if it didn't happen, Eve wouldn't have been deceived by the (((serpent))). This is how the world works. And concerning your words towards my alleged incredulity, dating apps don't represent the whole society. Not to mention that their target audience must be initiatally degenerate to even use such stuff. Most of the normies aren't that goytcattle'd to use these apps, hear me?

I'm not the guy, you're debaiting but this sound like it's full of kike speech, but the rest is correct, though

>>20675
i stopped reading your schizobabble after "original sin", but dating apps do represent the majority of people
>There's no such a thing as "women in general". There's no "we" but in general". They are not "we". We are we, not they.
What?

>LISTEN UP YOU BIGOTED RACIST CHUDERINO!
>THE RRAL PATRIARCHY IS WHEN WE HAVE STATE-MANDATED GFS BECAUSE WITHOUT IT I WON'T HAVE SEX REEEEEEE
>IT'LL BE JUST LIKE MUH HECKIN COMMUNISM ACCORDING TO ENGELS!
>FUCKING NAAHTZEE SPERGS

>>20673
gem

>>20679
>soybooru filename
nucaca not like this

>>20678
>behold my 1 KB pixel trash, it's surely proves my point!
This doesn't make your data relevant since it's gathered from only one ceratin site + who cares if there's no racial breakdown of these "statistics"? And how would such things say anything about women's nature if your own words claim that it wasn't like this decades ago (see the 1955 VS 2015 pic)? Not that the pic was real but you got it.
>What?
The sampling error increases because it likely includes many non-whites, but we sure don't have any info about how this data was gathered and etc., is it from the US? Is it from Britain? Maybe, Germany? France? Idk, that's all just a pretentious schizophasia transferred to infographics.

>>20678
full resolution because it uploaded as a thumbnail for some reason
>Not to mention that their target audience must be initiatally degenerate to even use such stuff.
that was true only in the late 90s and early 00s when the very first dating apps came out, they were seen as something that only losers use because internet was still alien tech to normies back then.

>>20681
My gallery was way too big to try to find that very gif. I have kind of thousands of files and I just couldn't find the gifted so yeah.

>>20682
>only one ceratin site
its an aggregate from a comprehensive study. your sources, xir
https://web.stanford.edu/~mrosenfe/Rosenfeld_et_al_Disintermediating_Friends.pdf
https://data.stanford.edu/hcmst
https://qz.com/1546677/around-40-of-us-couples-now-first-meet-online/
>racial breakdown
>non-whites
please go back to /pol/ already

>>20683
>Your words about the target audience are only applied to the 90s
No I mean how many people you met irl who used the apps to find the gf or at least had those? Such shit is popular among schoolers but they use bots in telegram instead as a rule. Therefore, your data is a distorted, exaggerated image of reality.

>>20685
<Your sources, xir
>Rosenfeld et al
Not like this...

>>20686
>how many people you met irl who used the apps to find the gf or at least had those?
not irl„ but just go on r/tinder, its one of the most active subs and the userbase is majority female
>Such shit is popular among schoolers but they use bots in telegram instead as a rule.
please show a single example of this
>>20687
>ITS DA JOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSS

>tfw you're telling the damn whytoid clittycel to go back to /pol/ or something the pussy isn't given

>>20689
or however*
if youre going to muttquote do it right nucaca

>>20688
>not irl„ but just go on r/tinder <...>
Said enough. Do you really think it's worth of discussing? Reddit is another 4cuck for normies, they barely can distinguish these. Believe me, it's a common thing.
>Any example of schooler bots for dating?
Since I'm a ESL zigger slavoidsky I can't give an example that isn't in cyrillic. Sowwy xhud.

>>20690
I couldn't decide what to put so I just intended to put both phrases and eventually forgot to add the "or []ever" part in the middle. My bad.

derailment because I mentioned femcels
>>20597

>>20691
it doesnt matter if reddit is 4chan or vice versa, or if normies can distinguish between the two, it is worth discussing because online data is often more reliable than personal surveys thanks to people not answering truthfully or not understanding the question
>I can't give an example that isn't in cyrillic.
ill take an example that is in cyrillic, screen translate is a thing you know.

>>20693
Better than the agugulee versus agugufaggot duels tbh

>>20694
>...it is worth discussing because online data is often more reliable than personal surveys thanks to people not answering truthfully or not understanding the question
Whether the data is irl or online, I don't care. Because that's not important. There are much more important things, for example, the Great Replacement. I know incels love bruin vaginas so it's not a problem for them, but let's pretend you all are not like this.
>I'll translate the example
Ok, I'm namedropping "ДайВинчик".

>>20695
this all start because I stated that femcels could exist. I didn't know that it would turn into bait

>>20696
>DaiVinchik
i said ill translate a screenshot, not go on a website i dont even have an account for. you cant just namedrop some literal whos telegram channel

>>20697
i repeat myself but at the end of the day what im saying is 'femcels' are yet another cheap attempt by women to invade the remaining few male exclusive spaces

>>20699
I still don't believe they exist (at least 94% sure).

>>20699
>da ebil woomeen try to invade our internet gay clubs! Alarm, fellow gaycels, we're in danger of interacting with the other sex!

>>20698
>just namedrop telegram channels
Wdym, why? It's meaningless. I highly doubt there are dating chats in telegram (or any other social media) but the gay ones, you know.

>>20701
foids don't use these types of sites doe

>>20701
>prove X
>X is proven
>ok but i dont care if its true because... STOP BEING GAY YOURE KILLING LE WHITE RACE
>>20702
we are probably failing to communicate because of the language barrier, but you said dating apps arent actually popular and that 'schoolers' use telegram instead.

>>20703
They use gay clubs to avoid being raped or harassed, in fact

>>20705
why exactly are men not allowed to have exclusive spaces but women do? please explain your reasoning, i am very curious