Drenthe

>>20249
Just tell those niggerlovers that you got tourette

>>20250
this is a good idea I should try this

replace nigger with another autistic word of your choosing, everytime you feel the rage inside you to call nogs for what they are, think of any other word, specifically one you like and at least you won't be seen as the racist incel chud next time

vivian this board is dead come to https://soygem.party/soy and marry me. we'll have lots of aryan children.

Thinks with his tbp^

>go to the shoally to post gay porn with me
Impressive

>>20327
i despise fgts

>>20323
everyone is a homosexual there though

>>20359
haha it's just ironic homosexuality little chud! it's not like people are actually gay or anything

>>20360
homos should be killed

>>20359
there are some hotties in the sisa thread

>>20368
they have a sisa thread and there are more photos of men than women

>>20370
time to fix that!

nevermind it's coalier than ever, no oc i can make will ever drown out the coal, it's over
i'm quitting the shemmy and this is my announcementerino on a rolled paper scroll, so heckin historical and vintage!

>>20415
Wow, who could have guessed it!

>>20415
only the kuzzycucks, chinnycucks, and the gayest of nushemmycucks use it, the real shemmy ended when angeleno left

What if you trained yourself to be my slave wife?

>what if you trained yourself to be my slave wife?

>>what if you trained yourself to be my slave wife?
'jakked you jartycuck

>>20448
you should hate people reproducing in general. the harms of coming into existence far outweighs the benefits

>>20448
two men cannot reproduce shemmypedo

>>20449
>dood existence is like bad bruh!
>im such a niche underground misanthrope redpilled volcel gnostic tiktokslangmaxxing unbothered anti-everything chad!

>>20451
youre evil and enjoy making yourself and others suffer

>>20449
then kys

>>20453
google vhemt and report back, young one

>>20452
one must imagine the sufferers happy

>>20454
summarize in below 100 words

>>20454
nta but why is protecting the environment good with no people 2 enjoy it

>>20456
>The absence of pain is good, even if that good is not enjoyed by anyone, whereas
>The absence of pleasure is not bad unless there is somebody for whom this absence is a deprivation.
>>20457
so the plants and animals can enjoy it

>>20458
you being alive right now and using a computer causes "environmental degradation" so if you actually believed in it you would go to a forest and kill yourself so you would stop taking resources and be digested and further life means no more pain and no more pleasure so you wouldn't care to be alive if you were consistent, there are quick and painless death methods.

>so the plants and animals can enjoy it
lol

>pain is always bad
childish take pain can push you to greatness

>>20461
you have a preset belief that causes you to resort to ad hominem and lash out mindlessly instead of thinking
one of the core tenets of vhemt is since were already here might as well live a long fulfilling life, doing as much for the environment as you can as an individual (emphasis on the 'as an individual' part) and dont reproduce.
>>20462
no species other than homo sapiens aggressively causes involuntary extinction
>>20463
false cause. pain unmakes people much, much more often than it makes them

>lash out
I am not, I am pushing your ideas to the limit and you are refusing to acknowledge this is the consistent conclusion of this ideology
>might as live a long fulfilling life
So now there is suddenly value to living despite it causing environmental damage, I thought the absence of pleasure didn't matter?
>aggressively causes involuntary extinction
Not even true, species die out all the time because of the more dominant predator preying on them. Animals are just as brutal to other animals as humans.

>>20466
the consistent conclusion of your strawman, you mean
the definition of 'fulfilling' varies
extinction caused by humans ≠ background extinction rate

>>20458
humans are the wisest animal
we deserve life more than animals and plants
but if we didn't
i would be for the humans becuse i am a human
i have no other reason
and that one is good

>>20467
precisely because people have varying beliefs of what fulfilling means there are people who get fulfillment through purposeful suffering, so you are dismissing your own previous statement. If you accept the fact that people can individually be a net benefit for the environment then humanity should continue living, if that is not the case then it is best for the individual to kill himself since that reduces the net harm over a full lifetime, that is the consistency. calling something background extinction rate does not dismiss the brutality of nature, nature is a struggle full of pain with or without humans.

>>20468
if we were wise, we wouldnt partake in tribalistic supremacism like this
>>20469
if it benefits the person then its pleasure, not pain, not contradictory at all. its just the 'suffering builds character' branding for insecure people who think unflavored self help is 'gay'
humanity is more than the sum of its parts. individuals can reduce their own impact on environment but the only way to stop degradation is the complete cessation of humanity which should be a gradual phaseout, not a mass dieoff
background extinction rate is an established scientific term. it is not related to the human concept of brutality

>>20449
The greatest argument against nihilism is to kill the nihilist

>>20458
so... kys? otherwise you will be in pain some day

>>20473
>which should be a gradual phaseout, not a mass dieoff

>>20474
just because

>>20471
why does the environment have more of a right to life than me?

>>20477
Because a human who hates himself said so.