Archive
archive for gemmy threads
ZWABAG
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 2081 | Views: 49 | Currently viewing: 1
>>6887
>describe in DETAIL what was in the 'p so I can goon to it more accurately
just shut it down already
>describe in DETAIL what was in the 'p so I can goon to it more accurately
just shut it down already
>>6888
>>6889
I want the details of the image because 'p has become fucking meaningless in the soysphere nowadays with people using the term to refer to regular porn that doesn't involve minors or slightly sexual images that don't show anyting graphic. The phrase p' should ONLY mean pornographic content that involves minors. What I want to know about the deleted image is if is was actually straight up porn and not just a slightly curvier version of a character and most importantly the age of who or what the fuck was in the image. I don't know if it was one of the underaged characters like the schoppenboer sisters or a hag like Vera so please for the love of god tell me That's all I want to know, I never said I wanted it described in GRAPHIC detail just enough detail so I can determine if the image was actually cp.
>>6889
I want the details of the image because 'p has become fucking meaningless in the soysphere nowadays with people using the term to refer to regular porn that doesn't involve minors or slightly sexual images that don't show anyting graphic. The phrase p' should ONLY mean pornographic content that involves minors. What I want to know about the deleted image is if is was actually straight up porn and not just a slightly curvier version of a character and most importantly the age of who or what the fuck was in the image. I don't know if it was one of the underaged characters like the schoppenboer sisters or a hag like Vera so please for the love of god tell me That's all I want to know, I never said I wanted it described in GRAPHIC detail just enough detail so I can determine if the image was actually cp.
>>6891
And it was actually straight up porn of them that was actually somewhat graphic?
And it was actually straight up porn of them that was actually somewhat graphic?
>>6891
Here's a better question: what is your defintion of 'p? What qualifies an image as 'p to you?
Here's a better question: what is your defintion of 'p? What qualifies an image as 'p to you?
'p is real life 'p.
drawn 'p is 'p of the drawn variety.
both are bad and should be completely destroyed.
drawn 'p is 'p of the drawn variety.
both are bad and should be completely destroyed.
>>6895
Annoying piece of shit here, I would like to give you all an explanation of my retardation. I initially thought that >>6881 (Oekakigod) was the one who posted the offensive material because someone (>>6883) accused him of posting the image and my gut reaction was to go: "wtf, there's no way he could post 'p of the characters, he only posts slightly sexualized stuff AT best, this HAS to be nusois not understanding what a phrase means" and so that's why I have appeared so neurotic and, dare I might say autistic trying to ask if the deleted image was 'p. I realized it WASN'T Oekakigod who made the post when I went to the ban list and found that someone was banned for CSAM around the same time he posted >>6881 and realized embarrassingly late that he made the post to insult the jannies for being slow, not because he was mad that it was deleted. So I would like to apologize for immaturely sperging here due to the important context that I had initially lacked.
Annoying piece of shit here, I would like to give you all an explanation of my retardation. I initially thought that >>6881 (Oekakigod) was the one who posted the offensive material because someone (>>6883) accused him of posting the image and my gut reaction was to go: "wtf, there's no way he could post 'p of the characters, he only posts slightly sexualized stuff AT best, this HAS to be nusois not understanding what a phrase means" and so that's why I have appeared so neurotic and, dare I might say autistic trying to ask if the deleted image was 'p. I realized it WASN'T Oekakigod who made the post when I went to the ban list and found that someone was banned for CSAM around the same time he posted >>6881 and realized embarrassingly late that he made the post to insult the jannies for being slow, not because he was mad that it was deleted. So I would like to apologize for immaturely sperging here due to the important context that I had initially lacked.
File:
1784484294016.png
(24.57 KB, 500x250, Oekaki.png)
>>6899
Everything is ok, no need to worry
Everything is ok, no need to worry
File:
1784484294016.png
(68.19 KB, 500x250, you both look like this, ACKtually!.png)
File:
1784484294016.png
(54.56 KB, 500x250, ClipboardImage.png)
>what actually happened
File:
1784484294016.png
(203.79 KB, 1115x569, Screenshot_20250729-054229_1.png)
File:
1784484294016.jpeg
(65.60 KB, 800x450, cover5.jpg)
>>6913
Draw an arm like picrel squeezing an Agugu like a stressball
Draw an arm like picrel squeezing an Agugu like a stressball
>>6916
you niggers don't care when maya gets abused so i don't wanna hear it
you niggers don't care when maya gets abused so i don't wanna hear it
File:
1784484294016.png
(30.96 KB, 500x250, Oekaki.png)
Maya love albeit
File:
1784484294016.png
(1.47 MB, 1197x2034, clittycel.png)
>>>99687 (You)
>Maya abuse is based since shes a shitskin though
>Maya abuse is based since shes a shitskin though
File:
1784484294016.png
(1.47 MB, 1197x2034, clittycel.png)
>>>99724 (You)
>poop and maya dying
>poop and maya dying
File:
1784484294016.webm
(3.97 MB, 540x960, i baked you a pie.webm)
>>>99730 (You)
>failquote + looking like that is based and aryan
>failquote + looking like that is based and aryan
File:
1784484294016.png
(15.07 KB, 500x250, ClipboardImage.png)
1488
File:
1784484294016.png
(984.37 KB, 1197x2034, 1702255209693.png)
>>>99687 (Mayacuck)
>Maya abuse is based since shes a shitskin though
>>>99724 (Mayacuck)
>poop and maya dying
>Maya abuse is based since shes a shitskin though
>>>99724 (Mayacuck)
>poop and maya dying
>>6927
At least the thread get is not coal like whatever is happening above
At least the thread get is not coal like whatever is happening above
File:
1784484294016-1.png
(1.47 MB, 1197x2034, clittycel.png)
File:
1784484294016-2.png
(1.47 MB, 1197x2034, clittycel.png)
>>>99687 (Mayachad)
>Maya abuse is based since shes a shitskin though
>>>99724 (Mayachad)
>poop and maya dying
>>>>99687 (Mayachad)
>>Maya abuse is based since shes a shitskin though
>>>>99724 (Mayachad)
>>poop and maya dying
>Maya abuse is based since shes a shitskin though
>>>99724 (Mayachad)
>poop and maya dying
>>>>99687 (Mayachad)
>>Maya abuse is based since shes a shitskin though
>>>>99724 (Mayachad)
>>poop and maya dying
File:
1784484294016.jpeg
(70.57 KB, 827x1028, IMG_20240802_141959_636.jpg)
>>>>99687 (Gooner)
>>Maya abuse is based since shes a shitskin though
>>>>99724 (Gooner)
>>poop and maya dying
>>>>>99687 (Gooner)
>>>Maya abuse is based since shes a shitskin though
>>>>>99724 (Gooner)
>>>poop and maya dying
>>Maya abuse is based since shes a shitskin though
>>>>99724 (Gooner)
>>poop and maya dying
>>>>>99687 (Gooner)
>>>Maya abuse is based since shes a shitskin though
>>>>>99724 (Gooner)
>>>poop and maya dying
>>6930
I'm not the other guy nor do I care for your gay shitflinging but you made this look like calling that first guy "mayachad" makes him look like that, which is the opposite of what you're trying to say
I'm not the other guy nor do I care for your gay shitflinging but you made this look like calling that first guy "mayachad" makes him look like that, which is the opposite of what you're trying to say
>>6934
You made him call them chads while looking like that. Which means calling them that makes one look like that. Which means you're accidentally siding with coco...
You made him call them chads while looking like that. Which means calling them that makes one look like that. Which means you're accidentally siding with coco...
File:
1784484294016-1.png
(172.17 KB, 590x720, an_average_cocodeity.png)
File:
1784484294016-2.jpeg
(25.79 KB, 825x410, IMG_20250213_202815_456.jpg)
>siding with coco...
<...accidentally
<...accidentally
Post actions
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 2081 | Views: 49 | Currently viewing: 1