No.8815
Yesterday it became known that “Belarus and Pakistan agreed to develop a mechanism by which labor migrants will be able to come to our country. Belarus is ready to hire 100-150 thousand Pakistani specialists.”
In Belarus, they don’t talk about this much – for obvious reasons, but there is also a mysterious silence on the opposition media front. Probably because it is indecent to speak badly about “foreign specialists” from developing countries. But we don’t have such restrictions, so we will be happy to analyze this, frankly, mistake of the Belarusian authorities.
So, given: a demographic catastrophe in Belarus.
Reasons:
- Annual decline in the birth rate
- Emigration
- Repressions of 2020, which caused a flow of refugees
State measures to prevent the crisis:
- Reduction in the birth rate – a program to support families with children. Had certain positive effects, but was insufficient.
- Emigration is connected with dissatisfaction with living conditions. The problem was not solved by Lukashenko, first of all, young people did not see opportunities for themselves, “social lifts” to stay in Belarus.
- Repressions – here the state not only did not react, but on the contrary, contributed to the catastrophe in every possible way. Somewhere in the depths of the bureaucratic quagmire of the presidential apparatus, a bright idea was born: “Let them leave! The woman off the cart, it’s easier for the horse. We’ll even help out.” This emphasizes the lack of strategic thinking, the ability to calculate the situation at least two steps ahead. The people who came up with this plan, in our opinion, should be in prison.
Result: In 2025, we formally have a little more than 9 million people, but in fact less, because it is difficult to track those who left for Russia, and those who carefully make a family nest abroad on a visa are generally impossible. We assume that in reality the population that associates its future with the Republic of Belarus is about 8,6 million. Belarusian propagandists like to call the Baltics “dying out”, but we have exactly the same “dying out”.
What to do in this case? There is a smart way. It was chosen by Poland (yes, Poland again, to the sorrow of our home-grown thinkers). The Poles willingly accepted the “Slavic brothers” - Belarusians and Ukrainians.
Since 2024 alone, the number of Belarusians has increased by 12%, and over the past five years (from 2020 to 2025) - by 287,000 people. Almost 5,000 companies with Belarusian capital operate.
Ukrainians are mainly women of childbearing age and children, only about one and a half million, 50-60 percent will remain in Poland, will pull up their families. The contribution of Ukrainians to GDP is estimated at 0,5%–2,4% annually, taxes and contributions amount to 15,1 billion zlotys. Now let us recall the continuous growth of GDP and purchasing power in Poland, including despite all the stories about the economic crisis in the EU. The Poles have organized a demographic Klondike for themselves.
Is it possible to organize something similar in Belarus? It is possible, it is even possible to partially return those who left, but only under the condition of a subtle political game, which the Presidential Administration, and especially the omnipresent KGB, are simply not capable of.
There is, let's say, a not very smart way. It has already been tried by EU countries, which organized mass migration of population groups from poor countries of Central Asia and North Africa. The idea was that migrants would strengthen the economy by taking low-paid jobs and improving the demographics (the migrants themselves plus their large families). Belarusian propagandists tell us with gusto what came out of this (migrants are on social security, do not integrate and increase crime). However, in fact, what we criticize, we reproduce ourselves.
Because Alexander Lukashenko decided to import 100-150 thousand "young Pakistani specialists" into the country. The very name makes one smile. Probably, neither Lukashenko nor his entourage have mastered anglophone social networks, otherwise they would know that "young specialists" from Somalia, Afghanistan and Pakistan are a popular meme in the West, ridiculing the antisocial behavior of the migrants.
<P.S. sorry for the quick and machine translation, you will get the point anyways
No.8816
Why is this an exceptionally bad decision?
Firstly, the quantity. The number of migrants was clearly chosen deliberately - to solve at least the problems associated with the lack of labor in one fell swoop. However, with such a number, Pakistanis will easily form their own linguistic and cultural enclaves, as they did with great haste in Great Britain. These enclaves will be absolutely impregnable for our social services and security forces, no one will know what will happen there until it is too late.
Secondly, the gender composition of the specialists. Pakistan is a very conservative Muslim country. Women sit at home. The “young specialists” will be strong young men, very interested in sexual relations without the consequences of marriage. In Pakistan, this is extremely strict, they can even kill, but Belarus is practically an erotic paradise for them, since Christian women are perceived as second-class citizens. We do not believe that young specialists will come strictly in pairs with a “code of exemplary behavior” in their pocket.
For readers from Belarusian authorities and especially law enforcement agencies, we recommend, for example, this article with the telling title “How rape culture in Pakistan led to the emergence of grooming gangs in the UK” (the author is Pakistani). We read the protocols of British courts on the topic of these gangs and, frankly, Belarus simply cannot imagine what awaits it.
Thirdly, how exactly will "young professionals" integrate into Belarusian life? Pakistanis mainly speak Urdu, broken English and other languages, but not Belarusian or Russian. Can you imagine doctors or bus drivers like these? They are not even Tajiks.
Fourthly, accepting 150 thousand people is a huge challenge for the infrastructure of Belarus. This will require significant resources to provide housing, transport and utilities.
Fifthly, social problems. New arrivals will receive a number of social privileges and increase competition, which will lead to justified envy on the part of Belarusians and program social conflicts.
In short, there is a feeling that someone in the Belarusian government really wants to aggravate the social crisis inside the country, nodding towards Russia, saying, look how well they are doing with migrants. Lukashenko does not understand either demography or sociology, it is easy for him to draw a beautiful picture of diligent and obedient Pakistanis ready to loyally increase the country's GDP. However, all this will end the same way as the story with COVID. The question is, who benefits from this?
No.8819
Same shit here. And in Ukraine they want to import 8 mln browns because women don't want to have children. Boomers would rather kill their own nation through replacement migration than remove the welfare state and admit the female emancipation was a mistake.
No.8820
>wordswordswords shitskin Pakistani rape belabrap women
Who would have thought
No.8824
Wait, that wasn't a bullshit???
I thought le Bat'ka just saying nonsense once again and nothing will happen.
No.8830
>>8824Hadn't doubt russians' cognitive abilities
No.8831
Have you guys ever thought of having children? instead of shipping in immigrants
No.8832
>>8831Way easier said than done dude
No.8833
>>8831You're sounding like a pedo… The average age of the userbase is around 10 (at max). Oh, yeah, and greeks aren't white btw.
No.8835
>>8832pvre cope
>>8833It was a general question you dumbass + it was shown that the average age here is 16-25
No.8836
Also Greece is white just like Finland, Egypt, Lesotho and Laos
No.8838
>>8837>>Have no soulI am not sure why you would think that but ok
>>Be condemned to burn in the lake of fireIncorrect statement
>>Cope about your non-whiteness>Even though I am just like the countries listedAverage Belarusian fail
No.8844
>>8838Why is my statement incorrect huh
No.8845
>>8844Why would G_d send me there?
No.8851
>>8850These are fake and you know it
How would ancient Israelites have a connection with modded Sweden anyways?
No.8853
>>8851Bruh are you elchanan?
No.8855
>>8852According to Oosthuizen's article, ofc. It's already clear it was some IE group, but the aforementioned author proposed two scenarios of migration with two different IE populations (Bulgarian CWC and Sintashta), and I tend to think the last (Sintashta variant) scenario is more plausible.
No.8856
>>8853I don't even know what this means
No.8857
>>8856Ok nevermind, just read my previous posts on /brabant/ idk
No.8862
>>8859You'll understand which one, just open the 'log