No.8203
Why are all nuvariants so incredibly ugly?
No.8204
>>8203This was an attempt by the sharty at making fun of cuckservatives, it's a start, but not something to keep going (variant speaking). The future is making fun of the rightoids now
No.8206
>>8204I thought it was making fun of the nulefty type, used to be edgy but is not any more, but idk
No.8207
It came from this thread
https://archive.is/YVuGK No.8208
>>8206Kinda, these are the people who jumped ships and now identify with the right. The soyboy evolved into a cuckservative faggot
No.8209
And if 'jakking is to remain a thing, it will have to change much of what it makes fun of, soyboys didn't disappeared or the phenomenon didn't get diluted to nothing, they changed, we didn't
No.8210
>>8208I might be living under a rock, but I'm pretty sure these are lefty types as seen in the thread, although I'm sure there will be 'jaks to make fun of cuckservatives
No.8211
>>8204Centristsissies? Apoliticalbros?
Soy is kinda contradictory to this and is always associated to lefties due to their consumerist lifestyle. Soyjaks worked because of that
No.8212
>>8210Chud has already existed for as long as soyjaks grew popular thoughbeit
No.8213
>>8212Chud doesn't make fun of cuckservatives albeit, it's more of a self-insert character more than anything now
No.8214
>>8211Jakking will have to evolve as the soyboy archetype is dead now, the lefties are still consumerist but in a different way, and the aesthetic of the nujaks should reflect their new appearance
No.8215
As for this particular jak, I think it is high iron, but can be polished into a gem
No.8216
>>8211Of course conservatives need to be mocked. The "democrats are the real homophobes" types, the duginist third worldist types, the zionists, the pro mass immigration business types.
No.8217
Jak the young man hating boomer pro-immigration conservative type. He will come useful in the future.
No.8218
>>8217Yeah but who will be the lucky candidate?
No.8219
I don't know yet. What is sure he cannot be drawn like a classical soyjak, because he's not a soyboy. More square head, not bald, no glasses, angry.
No.8220
>>8219I think the "Fell for it again award" Shitter meme is a good start on its own right. You need to find a big Israeli Rightoid shill, find the common denominator between those guys (they move a certain way, they say a certain thing, they make a certain face, etc) and go off from there. Because that single twitter niggerald has been more gemmy than all the 'jaks in the last 2 years
No.8221
>>8220>more 'jak innovation is happening outside of the shartyGEG, Froot just shut it down at this point
No.8222
>>8221Haven't you seen the alien gemerald that was made on twitter geg, the sharty outlived its usefulness
No.8224
>>8220Maybe we just need to go all the way back to smuggies. Although smuggies also depicted leftists, so slight adjustments would be required.
>>8221Xitter is already outjakking the sharty, even the swinny is despite being mostly dead, many gemmy antizionist 'jaks have come out of there. I don't see why the zarty shouldn't join the trend.
No.8225
>>8224>I don't see why the zarty shouldn't join the trend.I would like to see trve 'jakking and 'jak oc creation become more previlant in the Zarty, we made the drawboijak a few days ago so we should go for it
No.8226
>>8224'jakking on the Zarty is relegated to annoying namefags who get their picture leaked and get 'jakked. It's peculiar because the 'jak is "more personal"
No.8227
>>8226That's weird because we have many talented drawfags on here, but I've never seen a renaissance painting jakking thread or anything similar. People here make jaks only when they are personally obsessed with someone.
No.8228
>>8227Being obsessed is zartiecultuur shemmycuck
No.8229
>>8227Mostly exams the average Zaryan is old. I would do one if I've got the time, but I settle for other stuff because it's quicker to do
No.8232
>>8225>drawboijakSounds like another boogeyman
No.8233
>>8232It's a bona fide soyboy who likes to post troon stuff on Twitter. He has shit opsec btw.
No.8234
>>8232not incorrect, it's a shitter boogieman, this is da thread
>>>/qa/8879 No.8236
>>8235It's the fact that he got 'jakked that drives those guys mad, I think it's iron honestly, there's potential if you make him way more mad
No.8238
<captcha fail
like the seethe variant, more resembles the source material
No.8239
>>8221>>8222Old news at this point, for a while now most soy gems have been made offsite.
No.8240
>>8227Update: I am doing one
No.8243
>>8242I am still trying to understand how this variant could be used at its best since it's the closest thing there is to something fresh in terms of making fun of people. I am not sure if the hairs would stay
No.8244
>>8242>>8243Make it the ugliest thing in the world, this must work
No.8247
>>8243it's still too clean and polished, it needs to be more crude of zoiets (i'll probably try and redraw it with effort akin to 'plier in reference)
No.8437
>>8201These new 'jaks are pure Brimstone what has happened to the farty?
No.8438
>>8437>it's da farty Like blud thinks they still make 'jaks, nah blud lives in Indonesia ??
No.8439
>>8438>emojis are brokenZooot
No.8441
>>8440I never said the opposite
No.8442
>>8437It was made by a fag on Xitter
No.8443
>>8442Xitter outjaks the farty anyways, have you seen what they are making
No.8444
All of these suck. The 'jakking format is dead, you can't just revive it with varian:brimstone
No.8446
>>8444well the entire political world would need to shift back to 5-6 years ago at least. The 'jakking format is dead because the people who acted as a base disappeared/are not as prevalent anymore. When was the last time you've heard about a soy take in real life or the internet? And I don't mean a troon or a nurightoid take, an actual soy take like
>we should strive to be more inclusive of minorities and make my bvll happierShit make fun of MAGAkikes if you need
No.8447
>>8243The problem is that it's not exaggerated in its smugness. We already have smugjak for that which is gemmy.
I think mulletjaks should just be a subvariant of regular jaks since they aren't simple enough to be templates.
No.8448
>>8447>Vietnam Holy proxy, but yeah, they already got killed because they kept making only coaly variants of it, I don't think I have seen an actual soyquotes in a month over there
No.8449
>>8446It's not that soyboys vanished (they didn't, they rebranded at most) it's that memes wear out. Sounding like a broken record isn't funny.
No.8451
>>8449And that I guess, especially when literally everyone uses 'jaks nowadays
No.8455
>>8454The second one has some potential
No.8459
>>8457They look "too plain", but I'll try tracing the Magacels later