[ home ] [ q / qa / zellig / brabant / drenthe ] [ overboard ] [ v ] [ archive / telegram / zelligwiki / club / booru ] [ execution list / pph ] [ Rules / Contacts ] [] [ log in ]

/brabant/ - International Politics

or something
Name
Options
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

ZWABAG

File: 1764590881430.webp (365.78 KB, 1400x2543, 1400px-The_trvth_about_Ar….webp)

 No.14966

I've been seeing this holywar pic frequently while being online on various imageboards. Even having not known the actual state of things I always laughed at this delusional piece of jeetophrenia and judeodeceivement. But now, when I know the subject well enough, I can dismantle every single piece of nonsense depicted here.
So, first what we see, is this misleading title of an article that has nothing to do with the topic of ANE. Its content is actually about how the paleolithic proto-Europeans (Vestonice, Sunghir, Kostenki, El-Miron and Goyet-Q2 clusters) got the non-WE paternal lineages, and it's known¹ that they were mixed with IUP basal Eurasians which were more like modern East and South Asians. That means the pajeet who was the author of this abomination of infographics directly lied right to (You)r face. Also to (You)r information, the original Caucasoids aka Western Eurasians (WE) were genetically similar to the future WHG cluster of Villabruna. Which is notable, they (I mean the Villabruna sample itself) had the R1 haplotype too, meaning it's not obligatory to us to think that the R1 lineages among modern Europeans are derived from ancient East Asians, as it's plausible that they all could have carried some unique haplogroups for their populations. This circumstance nullifies the rapebaby take.
The second lie we face here, is the modeling which says that the ANE were allegedly 22% Eastern Eurasian (EE). If you'll read the text attached to that claim, you'll see these results are applied to the Yana RHS population which wasn't identical to people we know as the ANE. Therefore, what we see can be fairly considered to be nothing but intellectual fraud. Traditionally, both ANE and Dzudzuana-AHG-ANF are being modeled as 1/4 non-WE and 3/4 WE, but I've seen a qpAdm model which scored 9% of non-WE (that's to say, of a Basal Eurasian component, in this very case) for the latter population that is associated with modern Southern Europeans. I can assume that would be also fair enough to extrapolate this experience onto the ANE. However, academic modelations are too variable to be convinced in any of those. The only substantial fact is obvious for us is that both South-European-associated ancient Anatolians and their relatives were equally White compared to Ancient North Eurasians and their relatives (Western Siberian Hunter-Gatherers, the "Tarim mummies").
Another example of how deceitful this brilliant bait is, is the Eurogenes K13 breakdown of the Malta boy (MA1). The nuance which the author hid from the reader is that the Amerindians and South Asians have some ANE admixtures (be it from a population-intermediary or directly from the ANE people), not to mention that the archaic populations are always being modeled with some non-White admixtire due to the lack of the genetic drift of modern Europeans, so even being an original unmixed Caucasoid (so "whiter" than many modern Whites) won't save you from this calculator fallacy².
Now we are running into the most gross distortion of reality that could have ever been devised. And by this I imply the classical pajeet copium that the Indo-Europeans of pre-History were swarthy, like the pajeets themselves, and raped le real Europeans. You see, it's just a 180° turn of what really happened, but that's not the point. Sure, both Yamnaya and Corded Ware were originally brown-haired and brown-eyed, but still white-skinned and clusterized with Northern and Eastern Europeans of today. The light eyes and fair hair features they indeedly had derived by mixing with a peculiar EEF group which is the Globular Amphora. Since it wasn't purely ANF, but a mix of ANF and WHG with a high amount of genes from the latter, they inherited and improved their light-pigmentation tendencies, many of the WHG were truly blond³ and of course they all were blue-eyed, exactly thanks to them all the other White populations of history had the light eyes, the light hair and even the light skin as well!
So, it's the neolithic Europeans (genetically Mediterranean btw) who were "swarthy", and it's the Indo-European "immigrants" (conquerors) who were, guess what, le aryan (tall, blond and blue-eyed) beasts.
I hope it was useful for (You).
1 — https://youtu.be/Za_mYq-m0I4
2 — https://youtu.be/EB2vL7X1ZEQ
3 — https://youtu.be/Oy9GW2NB8SE

 No.14967

>>14966
P.S. worth of mention that the ANE diverged from a main WE stock yet in Europe, before migrating to Eastern Siberia. Just be informed.

 No.14968

>>14966
reading time and watch time yay

 No.14971

>>14967
Have you notice a trend of pajeets claiming how their culture was there first before any other

 No.14972

>>14971
Their culture, be it the Indus Valley niggerhell or whatever else, has always been a snca subject to me and everyone else besides the Indians themselves. Who cares about their ancestors? They hadn't done anything of note anyway. Just like their offspring.

 No.14973

>>14971
Do we have 2 US users here or what

 No.15007

File: 1764613747406.jpg (88.6 KB, 680x760, 1683965849817376.jpg)

The bottom part of this was also funny becuase up until then 90% of people alive at that point were swarthy including most europeans themselves until yamnaya and corded ware which is when most lighter pigmentation genes spring up due to indo european genetic selection. proto-indo european yammaya grugs weren't even responsible for the vast majority of the conquering and it was their globular amphora admixed (extremly violent patrilineal culture btw) corded ware europeans who looked like what you would consider north west europeans.

 No.15009

File: 1764614261229.jpg (112.98 KB, 571x1039, Sulkalmakh-187589296401639….jpg)

>>15007
and by the way, they didn't even look like that, they resembled eastern europeans but with a swarthy complexion

 No.15011


 No.15013

File: 1764619437979-0.webp (33.5 KB, 465x492, 171155881828684817.webp)

File: 1764619437979-1.jpg (27.5 KB, 366x276, src_10561876(1).jpg)

File: 1764619437979-2.jpg (250.76 KB, 905x1051, GCjSdWWWgAA7mGe.jpg)

File: 1764619437979-3.jpg (169.23 KB, 1200x1200, Fs31XBkXsAAvze1.jpg)

>>15009
Pretty fair

 No.15014

>>15013
>tarim mummy
ermm that can mean a lot of things xir, is the second one also a tarim mummy reconstruction? most initial tarim mummies were bolshemy's 80% ANE 20% east eurasian admixed and later on tarim mummies were more IE-admixed.

 No.15015

>>15014
Ofc the pics are of the ANE tarim mummies

 No.15016

>>15015
Except for the first one. It's of a WSHG man.



[Return][Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home ] [ q / qa / zellig / brabant / drenthe ] [ overboard ] [ v ] [ archive / telegram / zelligwiki / club / booru ] [ execution list / pph ] [ Rules / Contacts ] [] [ log in ]