No.12137
why do people call fuentes brown even though hes only like 25% mexican (not an ethnicity btw so his european mexican ancestry could heavily vary) hes more italian than mexican (50%) and has 25% irish ancestry he probally has like 15-5% beringian ancestry you can make fun of him for other reasons cmon
No.12138
>>12137although to peoples credit that one mugshot of him looks heavily beringian lol just in the phenotype. his mexican ancestor might be heavily beringian becuase it just shows through too much.
No.12139
>>12137/pol/ACKs think that anyone more left leaning than Hitler is a tranny-loving nigger with a cuck fetish. They will try to find any hint of non-European ancestry in anyone they disagree with too discredit their points (eve&oe most /pol/ users are browner than him GEG)
No.12143
>>12141southern italian closeness to ashkenazis is not from southern italians having ashkenazi ancestry it's from ashkenazis having 40-60% southern italian ancestry. im pretty sure theres a graph that proves that southern italians are still like, 30% middle eastern though. this also doesn't pull in the full picture becuase hes also 25% irish and 25% mexican.
No.12144
>>12143TSMT most people forget modern jews are Mega-Mutts in terms of how race-mixed they are
No.12145
>>12143im pretty sure if you took out all of the individual ancestries of each group (calabrian, mexican) and took out all of the non-white ancestry i think fuentes would be like 65% white white. i still don't like him though
No.12146
>>12145why dont you like him doe?
No.12147
>>12146hes a homosexual third worldist and he glows harder than the elephants foot.
No.12154
Sam Hyde just interviewed him on The Sam Hyde Show. No, I didn't watch it, and I am now unsubscribed to Sam Hyde, I can't take this Meximutt faggot seriously, he sounds too much like Ben Shapiro, and his takes are ridiculous.
No.12155
>>12154Why were you even subscribed in the first place if you're just going to unsubscribe over the smallest thing?
No.12156
>>12155Uhh i'm a clittycel. I guess I should just watch to see if it's really that bad.
No.12162
>>12142Put the basal west eurasian ancestral components it's not that hard
>>12143Ashkenazim are 60% levantine, southern shitalos are 50% levantine. Choose your shitskin, idiot.
>It's from ashkenazim having 40-60% Southern Shitalian ancestrySouthern Shitalos already were shitskin back then when the ashkenazim formed retard. That's to say between I and V centuries AD.
>>12144No you guys are just retards that's why you think I forgot this circumstance.
>>12145Wrongest nigger award. 75% of his ancestry isn't european, period.
No.12168
>>12162>Southern Shitalos already were shitskin back then when the ashkenazim formed retard. That's to say between I and V centuries AD.Yeah? southern shitalians are still 50-60% euro you can't deny that. im not saying they are white but they are significantly european with an obvious levantine aspect due to roman era muttification.
>Wrongest nigger award. 75% of his ancestry isn't european, period.biggest most retarded reductionist baboon award.
No.12170
>>12169i think it would be better if we just got to see his parents/grandparents unironically from his calabrian and mexican side. would clear a lot of things up if you ask me.
No.12171
Irish are the jews of the huwite race, it checks out
No.12173
>>12165>it's not about phenotypeGuess I could be white after all…
No.12174
>>12171irish are aryans lol
>>12173yes pheno actually doesn't matter a lot. spaniards are just swarthy due to skin pigmentation genes but are closer (and by a longshot) to germans genetically. in comparison, "white" looking georgians (from the country) aren't related to europeans at all and are their own thing but sometimes just have naturally lighter skin. you might have small amounts of turkish DNA if you are unlucky though. serbs im pretty sure are still like 90% white thoughie on average which is the same as spaniards.
No.12175
No spic nick is turbofedgriftercoal geeeg
No.12179
>>12177Sorry i didn't like how that post came out. what i was trying to say that an average does not mean everyone in a population. FOR EXAMPLE. white americans are on average, 95% white and 5% something la atrocidad not white. HOWEVER, the vast majority of white americans don't non-white ancestry and a minority has a small amount of it which shows up on the end result.
No.12180
>>12179im sourcing this from some random ancient ahh graph that i don't have downloaded but im sure that everyone here has seen so you'll just have to believe me
No.12182
>>12164He doesn’t act white
No.12183
>>12182This. to be honest being like 30-35% non white in my opinion at the very least is forgivable if you are of a high iq and don't have extreme amounts of subsaharan DNA (although middle eastern and beringian are forgivable since they are eurasians and sandnigs and natives already share SOME genetic ties to europeans, nogs aren't even related to even eurasians and their skull shapes honestly scare me out of how foreign they really are.)
this is the problem with a lot of near-europeans, they're like 75% something white but their iq is mediocre and dysgenic which is why nations like brazil and argentina failed but the iberian med system of goverment is honestly atrocious.
No.12184
>>12183Also fun fact 30% andronovo pakistanis are closer to northern europeans than 50% iberian mexicans. this is due to ones european ancestry population being naturally very much closer to modern northern europeans than the other. andronovo were basically swedes lel
No.12185
>>12168>southern shitalians are still 50-60% euro you can't deny thatTurks are ≈55% white if speaking strict. Most caucasians are ≈60% white. Ashkenazim and Mauritalians are ≈70% white. I'm not going to summarize all the non and white admixtures because he's mainly a mix of nons between themselves and only 25% irish. So basically only 25% properly white ancestry. I bet, even balkan turks would pass as white with a more probability than Nick. Lmao.
>>12169Mathcuck, his white european ancestry is leveled out by mexicans, so basically he's still moor-tier white.
>>12173Not gonna deny that but serbians are actually european but still too southern for me so I still haye 'em
>>12177Only one percent pass as white. Gegging so hard rn.
>>12179False. 94% Americans don't even have any non admixtures in them.
>>12183>IQ changes your raceHapa Mymy-Maya-fag pedo cult ITT, shut it down
>>12184>Andronovo pakistanisWhom the fuck are you implying
>Bronze age aryans I mean…
No.12186
>>12185>Turks are ≈55% white if speaking strictThat's very few turks lol. maybe the ones who live in the european continent part of the country.
>Ashkenazim and Mauritalians are ≈70% white.ashkenazism are not that white lol. italians might be true but ashkenazism are literally as white as southern italians like you said with sometimes a bit of germanic and slavic on them.
>Mathcuck, his white european ancestry is leveled out by mexicans, so basically he's still moor-tier white.Mexican isn't an ethnicity. we don't know if his parents were 1% criollos or literal natives.
>False. 94% Americans don't even have any non admixtures in them.true.
>>IQ changes your racei was not implying this, they are still white (depending on how you view it) they're just low iq and unreliable.
>Only one percent pass as white. Gegging so hard rn.cucking millions of latinx with 80% white ancestry
No.12187
>Whom the fuck are you implying
im anthropology babbling too hard here sorry
No.12188
heres my honest opinion on latinx whiteness
>20-50%
not even, europeans are literally closer to afghanis/tajiks/tatars than they are to this tier of euro ancestry latinx
>50-60%
euro-adjacent but not "aryan" or closely related to northern europeans in any way. connection to spanish/iberians is present but i wouldn't call these people white honestly lol
>60-75%
European and white but still not "aryan". even stronger conection to iberians but weak connection to northern europeans.
>75-85%
European, not sure about how aryan these people are but it depends on how much beringian or ssa they have
>85-100%
basically white european and aryan with the only exception being is that they have too much subsaharan like brazilians.
No.12189
>>12188this is excluding middle eastern and assuming you are purely iberian in your european so this isn't counting all of the white argentiniaGOD ethnics who have northern euro in them
No.12190
>>12186>That's very few turks lol. maybe the ones who live in the european continent part of the countryI'm referring to their principal components, not what you think.
>>Ashkenazism are not that white lol. italians might be true but ashkenazism are literally as white as southern italians like you said with sometimes a bit of germanic and slavic on them.>Ashkenazim Firstly, geg. Secondly, "Mauritalians" stood for the southern italians in that very sentence.
>Mexican isn't an ethnicity. we don't know if his parents were 1% criollos or literal nativesWhataboutism
>>i was not implying this, they are still white (depending on how you view it) they're just low iq and unreliable>if you're low IQ but white enough we still won't consider you white bcs low IQ is a nigger trait kek!Am I reading you right?
>80% white is enoughWhat about 80% white and 20% negro? Pushkin doesn't seem to be a very european example. So I don't think 20% non-europeoid isn't significant.
>>12187I know who are the Andronovo aryans. I can't comprehend the reason you called them pakistanis.
No.12191
>>12188Huge medications unto you
No.12192
>>12189>Whataboutismnot a whataboutism latinx aren't one uniform ethnic blob they aren't even a fucking race
>Firstly, geg. ok so 50% levantine ashkenazis are white-passing now? askhenazis are literally closer to palestinians than they are to germans.
>Am I reading you right?No they are still white. being dysgenic does not exclude you from a race in any way
No.12195
>I'm referring to their principal components, not what you think.
So you mean like the elite of turkey?
>What about 80% white and 20% negro? Pushkin doesn't seem to be a very european example. So I don't think 20% non-europeoid isn't significant.
20% negro would be an outlier in white latinxes. african ancestry is pretty rare in large amounts amd even amongst pardos and brazilian "negro" it's something like 30-50%. HOWEVER, you do have a point and there is a need to differentiate negro from beringian and middle eastern since the former is extremly genetically distant in comparison. it's mostly 0-4% in most latinx including their "white" substrate and i think it would be fair to denote anything above 6-14% african ancestry in whites as unfitting for the status of being officially european or white. although still euro-adjacent but obviously not put in with all of europeans. most "white" latinx also can get lumped into this.
No.12196
>>12195So yes, 20% non-europeoid is mostly fine or acceptable as long as there isn't too much subsaharan lumped in or it's purely just subsaharan. it would still genetically lump you close to europeans if it was something like 80% european 10% middle eastern 8% beringian 2% SSA just as an example.
No.12197
You can be european and white but still not aryan. there is a difference between euro-adjacent groups (WHG,ANF,EEF) and yamnaya and having little yamnaya or steppe ancestry makes you automatically non-aryan. i'd say anyone below 30% steppe can't be classified as aryan which even most greeks have
No.12198
>>12192>>Firstly, geg>So ashkenazim are white?No I wanted to write "ashkenazism" because it's written so in your post, and it looked kinda funny for me.
>You're not reading me rightOk
>>12195>You meant the elite of Turkey?I meant the whole pop. "Principal" means "basal" or "basic". However, being ESL is aryan, fnf pedos on da shardee told me so!
>>12195Beringians? You mean North-Eastern Asians? I tend to equate them to negroes, since both are non-europeoid (europeoid = caucasoid in the broad meaning).
>>12195Let's just conclude that:
>more than 10% of +- pure mongols and negroes (and the corresponding ancestral pops) is illiquid >and that more than 20% of non-european (= non-white) europeoid components is illiquid as well>it would still genetically lump you close to europeans if it was something like 80% european 10% middle eastern 8% beringian 2% SSA just as an exampleYes but it's not what most of the latingos represent.
>>12197Why is the border 30%? Why not higher? Why not lower? And lol a lot of southern euros have lower than 30%, such as greeks, italians, spaniards, etc., I would even say the most of them.
No.12199
>>12197>No I wanted to write "ashkenazism" because it's written so in your post, and it looked kinda funny for me.No I wanted to write "ashkenazism" because it's written so in your post, and it looked kinda funny for me.my bad
>I meant the whole pop. "Principal" means "basal" or "basic". However, being ESL is aryan, fnf pedos on da shardee told me so!ok
>Beringians? You mean North-Eastern Asians? I tend to equate them to negroes, since both are non-europeoid (europeoid = caucasoid in the broad meaning).Native americans. they're still eurasian and them and europeans share ancient north eurasian ancestry which doesn't make them in any way close to europeans however it is worth tossing them in a different group from negros since negros aren't even related to most of humanity and are completely different to our own. their skull shapes scream of this.
>Yes but it's not what most of the latingos represent.Yes we latingos arent white
>Why is the border 30%?includes most europeans except obviously for the groups you are mentioning which btw greeks and spaniards i think average around 30%. they can still be white and european but being aryan is exclusive sorry lol
>Why not lower?saar we 25% steppe white SAAAR BRAHMIN SAAAAR
No.12202
>>12199>Native Americans are still eurasianIdc about eurasians but west eurasians (europeans), Half-white-half-latino will be roughly grouped with MENA arabs.
>however it is worth tossing them in a different group from negrosI consider them to be one of the main "human" races, so I only put them into the group of the originally non-white main races (non-white europeoids are basically mulattos yuo know)
>since negros aren't even related to most of humanity Idc about the "global humanity"
>and are completely different to our own."Our"?
>their skull shapes scream of this.Also the skeleton, nervous system, muscles, and everything else too. Just like Asians.
>includes most europeans except obviously for the groups you are mentioning which btw greeks and spaniards i think average around 30%. they can still be white and european but being aryan is exclusive sorry lol I consider anyone with WHG+WSH=>50% a northerner and I think it is logical to connect "aryanness" with this "northernness", that's to say I equate the terms "aryan" and "north-european" sometimes, but really the most WSH peoples among whites are Celto-Germanics followed by other northerners like Balts, Slavs and Finns.
No.12205
I don't agree about making 80% euros non-white in all cases since it's not practical but you have completely beaten me here. good work.