International Politics
or something
ZWABAG
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 350 | Views: 5 | Currently viewing: 1
>>4066
Rurik was definitely Swedish, but it’s not like the countries haven’t had a fair exchange of relevant people like Alfred Nobel who studied in Russia. I won’t deny that a lot of Russians have Scandinavian blood, but claiming to be Scandinavian is just plain saddening. Maybe you should be proud of your Slavic heritage.
Rurik was definitely Swedish, but it’s not like the countries haven’t had a fair exchange of relevant people like Alfred Nobel who studied in Russia. I won’t deny that a lot of Russians have Scandinavian blood, but claiming to be Scandinavian is just plain saddening. Maybe you should be proud of your Slavic heritage.
>>4068
That's what I am talking about. Peace to you, West-Finnish broder
That's what I am talking about. Peace to you, West-Finnish broder
>>4070
Halfshitlian-halfarabic didn't gave us permission to call ourselves white, it's over guys.
Halfshitlian-halfarabic didn't gave us permission to call ourselves white, it's over guys.
>>4052
>i had more sexual fantasies regarding danish men than italian men
>that must mean that it's the same for women too!
faggot (german) moment
>i had more sexual fantasies regarding danish men than italian men
>that must mean that it's the same for women too!
faggot (german) moment
>>4070
everybody besides you you mean? your goatfucker algerian ass cant be considered white at all.
everybody besides you you mean? your goatfucker algerian ass cant be considered white at all.
>>4074
Like rhyming poetry, when Germans are mentioned you can expect a faggot to show up
Like rhyming poetry, when Germans are mentioned you can expect a faggot to show up
>>4077
it's basically part of the genetic code at this point
the legacy of thousands of years of getting raped by the italian man lives on in the germoid mind to this day
it's basically part of the genetic code at this point
the legacy of thousands of years of getting raped by the italian man lives on in the germoid mind to this day
>>4079
>Be Germans
>live in mudhuts and worship the trees for centuries
>Immigrate to the superior Roman lands (ruining them in the process)
>squabble over ex-Roman territories, and the title of "Roman Empire"
>Erm actually my swampy clithole is the legitimate heir to the Roman Empire!
>inbreeding.jpeg
>Cause the Reformation, dividing a millenary Christian legacy
>Still squabbling over lands owned by slavoids hundreds of years later
>Overshadowed by other colonial powers during the colonial race
>Lose WW1
>Lose WW2
>Was cucked by the US and the USSR until 30 years ago
>Become a servant to the Jewish masters
Why are we worshipping Germans again?
>Be Germans
>live in mudhuts and worship the trees for centuries
>Immigrate to the superior Roman lands (ruining them in the process)
>squabble over ex-Roman territories, and the title of "Roman Empire"
>Erm actually my swampy clithole is the legitimate heir to the Roman Empire!
>inbreeding.jpeg
>Cause the Reformation, dividing a millenary Christian legacy
>Still squabbling over lands owned by slavoids hundreds of years later
>Overshadowed by other colonial powers during the colonial race
>Lose WW1
>Lose WW2
>Was cucked by the US and the USSR until 30 years ago
>Become a servant to the Jewish masters
Why are we worshipping Germans again?
>>4080
We won't mention that Italians have german blood too and that most of Italian nobility had Langobardi/Ostergothic/Frankish roots. Very based and trve tho.
We won't mention that Italians have german blood too and that most of Italian nobility had Langobardi/Ostergothic/Frankish roots. Very based and trve tho.
>>4016
>no, they weren't "mainly" from the Lithuania, most of the nobility was still Polish
At least the most famous szlachticzy were descended from these families (like Wiśniowieccy or Radziwiłły)
>and those who weren't Polish were adopting Polish customs and religion quite fast
<"the majority of the local nobility knew about their Lithuanian or Belarusian ethnic origin, but perceived the linguistic and cultural Polonization of their ancestors as an act of their voluntary political and civilizational choice" Juliusz Bardach
>belarusian/ukrainian ethnicity wasn't a thing then
And what did you wanna say by this? Does that fact we had other ethnonyms debunk our identity and existence? That's a rhetorical question.
>>4017
>but ruthenian was, to be fair
Geg, even if it was so, how does it contradict my point?
>>4018
"Tutejszy"?
>>4015
Whatever vends were, they had been germanized. Also, 99% of the modern Pomeranian and Silesian Poles aren't native, but a result of Soviet policy in Eastern Europe ("half of whitoids we'll deport to Siberia, other half we'll just eliminate and replace"). The only thing you have done by this commentary is dancing on the bones of 2 mln of white germans.
>slavs did the same things with colonization, creating history and stuff.
I meant they were existing in the worse living conditions (despite their countless tries to build better society, see Kościuszka uprising) compared to Germans and, somewhat sometimes, to Spaniards and other Southerners (as far as I know). Not to mention Russians in general and Russian peasantry in particular, we all know they were in terrible, almost asiatic conditions (European serfdom and "kryepostnoye
pravo" it's not the same, yeah, the last one is much worse).
>feudalism never existed, all this formation shit is made up by marx
Marx made up only that feudalism existed outside of Europe, but, anyway, by "feudalism" I meant a dominance of the sacred right of private property and its influence on everything else, including the state. Obviously, only european racial characteristics could let this type of society to exist.
>formations
I don't believe in this shit (I wonder why lol), so I'll just say the mentioning of the feudalism doesn't imply that I'm a commie or support formation ideas.
>no, they weren't "mainly" from the Lithuania, most of the nobility was still Polish
At least the most famous szlachticzy were descended from these families (like Wiśniowieccy or Radziwiłły)
>and those who weren't Polish were adopting Polish customs and religion quite fast
<"the majority of the local nobility knew about their Lithuanian or Belarusian ethnic origin, but perceived the linguistic and cultural Polonization of their ancestors as an act of their voluntary political and civilizational choice" Juliusz Bardach
>belarusian/ukrainian ethnicity wasn't a thing then
And what did you wanna say by this? Does that fact we had other ethnonyms debunk our identity and existence? That's a rhetorical question.
>>4017
>but ruthenian was, to be fair
Geg, even if it was so, how does it contradict my point?
>>4018
"Tutejszy"?
>>4015
Whatever vends were, they had been germanized. Also, 99% of the modern Pomeranian and Silesian Poles aren't native, but a result of Soviet policy in Eastern Europe ("half of whitoids we'll deport to Siberia, other half we'll just eliminate and replace"). The only thing you have done by this commentary is dancing on the bones of 2 mln of white germans.
>slavs did the same things with colonization, creating history and stuff.
I meant they were existing in the worse living conditions (despite their countless tries to build better society, see Kościuszka uprising) compared to Germans and, somewhat sometimes, to Spaniards and other Southerners (as far as I know). Not to mention Russians in general and Russian peasantry in particular, we all know they were in terrible, almost asiatic conditions (European serfdom and "kryepostnoye
pravo" it's not the same, yeah, the last one is much worse).
>feudalism never existed, all this formation shit is made up by marx
Marx made up only that feudalism existed outside of Europe, but, anyway, by "feudalism" I meant a dominance of the sacred right of private property and its influence on everything else, including the state. Obviously, only european racial characteristics could let this type of society to exist.
>formations
I don't believe in this shit (I wonder why lol), so I'll just say the mentioning of the feudalism doesn't imply that I'm a commie or support formation ideas.
>>4061
In fact 99% of all gay discussions are usually caused by russians
In fact 99% of all gay discussions are usually caused by russians
>>4044
fucking shitskin you tainted my board with fucking tranime kys immediately please
fucking shitskin you tainted my board with fucking tranime kys immediately please
>>4085
Because brits are the rapebabies of french, angloids and celts. Even English got tainted
Because brits are the rapebabies of french, angloids and celts. Even English got tainted
File:
1784479156062-1.jpeg
(15.93 KB, 578x462, Sc202403m.jpg)
File:
1784479156062-2.png
(43.89 KB, 512x512, file_149464668.png)
File:
1784479156062-3.jpeg
(24.40 KB, 600x719, FFX4D3jWQAQaI_n.jpg)
>>4088
>Anglos are rapebabies by angloids!!!
<Doctor BWCauci, should we tell him?
^Nee, leave him be as he is, it's so funny.
>Anglos are rapebabies by angloids!!!
<Doctor BWCauci, should we tell him?
^Nee, leave him be as he is, it's so funny.
>>4089
The self hating slav arrived. Not like it matters since the UK is just Jeetlandia
The self hating slav arrived. Not like it matters since the UK is just Jeetlandia
>>4090
I don't hate slavs, the only reason why you think so it's because I said Germanics are "primus inter pares".
I don't hate slavs, the only reason why you think so it's because I said Germanics are "primus inter pares".
File:
1784479156062.png
(213.51 KB, 1007x1157, ClipboardImage.png)
>>4083
>Geg, even if it was so, how does it contradict my point?
It doens't, I said that to cantradict Pole's point.
>Whatever vends were, they had been germanized.
Yup, germanized and then slavised, pretty fair I think.
>99% of the modern Pomeranian and Silesian Poles aren't native
Just like Germans were on these lands???
>The only thing you have done by this commentary is dancing on the bones of 2 mln of white germans.
Which planned to dance on the bones of all Russian nation. Not like I'm a fan of commies but I have no pity for Germans after what they did to us(and you btw).
>I meant they were existing in the worse living conditions compared to Germans
Depends from the period and the place actually, there was a time when Kievan Rus was the most cultured and literate state in Europe(after Byzantium).
>Russian peasantry were in terrible, almost asiatic conditions
Meeeeeehhhhh, please use something else, it's always the same. It depends from the period and ruler, there was Alexander I and Pavel I, and there was a Catherine II. Difference is noticeable as well. Plus even when western peasants became "free" they still had no rights, somewhere their conditions were even worse than in Russia lol. Google something about english poor laws for example.
>By "feudalism" I meant a dominance of the sacred right of private property and its influence on everything else
One word. Enclosure. No, really, you are too optimistic about western civilization. Private property wasn't sacred and still isn't, unfortunately. They literally stole russian assets recently, you know.
Ahead of your answer I will counter-argue it in advance with picrel. Look, you was drawn as silly loser soyjack, that means your opinion is wrong anyway.
>Geg, even if it was so, how does it contradict my point?
It doens't, I said that to cantradict Pole's point.
>Whatever vends were, they had been germanized.
Yup, germanized and then slavised, pretty fair I think.
>99% of the modern Pomeranian and Silesian Poles aren't native
Just like Germans were on these lands???
>The only thing you have done by this commentary is dancing on the bones of 2 mln of white germans.
Which planned to dance on the bones of all Russian nation. Not like I'm a fan of commies but I have no pity for Germans after what they did to us(and you btw).
>I meant they were existing in the worse living conditions compared to Germans
Depends from the period and the place actually, there was a time when Kievan Rus was the most cultured and literate state in Europe(after Byzantium).
>Russian peasantry were in terrible, almost asiatic conditions
Meeeeeehhhhh, please use something else, it's always the same. It depends from the period and ruler, there was Alexander I and Pavel I, and there was a Catherine II. Difference is noticeable as well. Plus even when western peasants became "free" they still had no rights, somewhere their conditions were even worse than in Russia lol. Google something about english poor laws for example.
>By "feudalism" I meant a dominance of the sacred right of private property and its influence on everything else
One word. Enclosure. No, really, you are too optimistic about western civilization. Private property wasn't sacred and still isn't, unfortunately. They literally stole russian assets recently, you know.
Ahead of your answer I will counter-argue it in advance with picrel. Look, you was drawn as silly loser soyjack, that means your opinion is wrong anyway.
If slavs are white then why do we kill other whites (Ukrainians)? Just wonder
>inb4 we're fighting against neo-nazi or something
>inb4 its all started in 2014...
>inb4 the eastern part of Ukraine should be ours since the 90s
>inb4 we're fighting against neo-nazi or something
>inb4 its all started in 2014...
>inb4 the eastern part of Ukraine should be ours since the 90s
>>4096
For the sake of our Israeli overlords obviously, stop asking stupid questions you goy
For the sake of our Israeli overlords obviously, stop asking stupid questions you goy
File:
1784479156062.png
(1.06 MB, 1264x944, 39436 - SoyBooru.png)
>>4061
feel free to look at the op. my paragraphs on topic pal
>>4074
LMAO
yeah man ur right! women dont care if ur short ugly or brown! just be confident and youll score them all bro!
>>4079
north italy get raped to the point where most of the regions ancestors go back to germany, meanwhile theres no evidence of the reverse happening. also coincides how the north of ur country is the best place to live
>>4080
keep writing essays on how germanics slaughtered u along side with the rest of europe countless times u bug eyed rape victim of dark triad germanic warriors. pic related
feel free to look at the op. my paragraphs on topic pal
>>4074
LMAO
yeah man ur right! women dont care if ur short ugly or brown! just be confident and youll score them all bro!
>>4079
north italy get raped to the point where most of the regions ancestors go back to germany, meanwhile theres no evidence of the reverse happening. also coincides how the north of ur country is the best place to live
>>4080
keep writing essays on how germanics slaughtered u along side with the rest of europe countless times u bug eyed rape victim of dark triad germanic warriors. pic related
File:
1784479156062-1.png
(122.43 KB, 899x1078, wewuzvikingsnshiet.png)
File:
1784479156062-2.png
(275.46 KB, 765x719, ACKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK.png)
>How dare you to call us Germanoids rapebabies who lived in mudhuts, I'll let you know that we wuz literally vikings and shiet....ehy this rope is getting a bit tight...
>ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!
>ACCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!
File:
1784479156062-1.png
(125.34 KB, 346x378, ClipboardImage.png)
File:
1784479156062-2.png
(166.44 KB, 342x414, ClipboardImage.png)
File:
1784479156062-3.png
(143.20 KB, 337x493, ClipboardImage.png)
File:
1784479156062-4.png
(203.01 KB, 333x784, ClipboardImage.png)
>>4099
>germanics slaughtered u along side with the rest of europe countless times
Should we tell him guys?
>germanics slaughtered u along side with the rest of europe countless times
Should we tell him guys?
>>4101
I was going to make a Italo/Roman vs Germanic list, but it'd end up WAY too large. Let the Germ larp as something relevant
I was going to make a Italo/Roman vs Germanic list, but it'd end up WAY too large. Let the Germ larp as something relevant
>>4102
Dude isn't it friendly fire? You're Germanic yourself. Only if you aren't a based TRVE heir of Rome on British Isles - the Welsh.
Dude isn't it friendly fire? You're Germanic yourself. Only if you aren't a based TRVE heir of Rome on British Isles - the Welsh.
>>4100
no one mentioned vikings, are you okay?
>>4101
cheers, go ahead and cherrypick a few more battles. kievan rus was founded by scandinavians and the russian empire was ruled by german monarchs for hundreds of years btw
>>4102
germanic tribes obliterated the romans. not sure why ur so condescending. anglo saxons originate from germany and germany mogs the uk in most metrics anyways
no one mentioned vikings, are you okay?
>>4101
cheers, go ahead and cherrypick a few more battles. kievan rus was founded by scandinavians and the russian empire was ruled by german monarchs for hundreds of years btw
>>4102
germanic tribes obliterated the romans. not sure why ur so condescending. anglo saxons originate from germany and germany mogs the uk in most metrics anyways
File:
1784479156062.jpeg
(47.71 KB, 774x1080, ongezellig maya laughing.jpg)
>>4102
LMAO. sad!
LMAO. sad!
File:
1784479156062.png
(470.86 KB, 736x784, ClipboardImage.png)
>>4104
>kievan rus was founded by scandinavians
yeah, and the grandson of first ruler was named Svyatoslav and he was like radical slavic paganist.
>russian empire was ruled by german monarchs for hundreds of years
Yeeeeeeah, Geeeeeerman, of course. Nobility has no ethnicity fella, Romanovs mixed with Polish\French\English\Russian\German\Tatar\etc nobles for so long that no one actually can say who tf are they.
I'm not telling that Germans some kind of losers btw, they just weren't based viking ass conquerors-impregnators as you claim them to be. They more like poor guys that was bullied by everyone so they got stronger just to be bullied again. Also you are actually slavic. Live with it.
>kievan rus was founded by scandinavians
yeah, and the grandson of first ruler was named Svyatoslav and he was like radical slavic paganist.
>russian empire was ruled by german monarchs for hundreds of years
Yeeeeeeah, Geeeeeerman, of course. Nobility has no ethnicity fella, Romanovs mixed with Polish\French\English\Russian\German\Tatar\etc nobles for so long that no one actually can say who tf are they.
I'm not telling that Germans some kind of losers btw, they just weren't based viking ass conquerors-impregnators as you claim them to be. They more like poor guys that was bullied by everyone so they got stronger just to be bullied again. Also you are actually slavic. Live with it.
File:
1784479156062.jpeg
(37.18 KB, 652x479, ClipboardImage.png)
this is the person calling you short, ugly and brown btw
File:
1784479156062.png
(204.95 KB, 694x724, ClipboardImage.png)
>>4106
>They more like poor guys that was bullied by everyone so they got stronger just to be bullied again
basically this. germoids love their barbarian invasion LARP but barbarians were never doing a war of conquest, they were just getting slaughtered and raped by the Huns so hard in their own homeland that they had to flee to Rome. germoids were LITERALLY the negro rapefugees of their time.
>They more like poor guys that was bullied by everyone so they got stronger just to be bullied again
basically this. germoids love their barbarian invasion LARP but barbarians were never doing a war of conquest, they were just getting slaughtered and raped by the Huns so hard in their own homeland that they had to flee to Rome. germoids were LITERALLY the negro rapefugees of their time.
>>4096
>If slavs are white then why do we kill other whites (Ukrainians)?
Because 99% of russoids are commies albeit being White but dysgenic and morally degenerate.
>>4095
>>Whatever vends were, they had been germanized.
>Yup, germanized and then slavised, pretty fair I think.
Nee, local mixed germano-slavic population had been eliminated by ((('ed A'my))). They either left their home and emigrate to Western Germany, or were killed.
>Just like Germans were on these lands???
Ancient Poland (in BC period) was inhabited by Germanic tribes. Slavs are a result of balto-germanic (with unmeasured celtic influence) intermixing near Subsylvania aka Podlachia.
>Which planned to dance on the bones of all Russian nation. Not like I'm a fan of commies but I have no pity for Germans after what they did to us(and you btw)
Number of nazis' victims in our country is ≈900k. 700-750k of them — are the holocausted Jews. The other 100-150k it's killed as a result of the war with the partisans (don't forget about soviet partisans' terror towards belarusian volk, especially peasants, because the Reich returned back private landowning). Resuming, there was no genocide or any impactful slavophobic sentiment in the Reich. The Soviets, together with Jews, invented this myth.
>Depends from the period and the place actually, there was a time when Kievan Rus was the most cultured and literate state in Europe(after Byzantium).
It is just unrealistic. Orthodox church had no such a tradition of (relatively) common education as the Roman-Catholics had. The most important difference is that western monks were chronically busy with rewriting books and other intellectual activities (unlike the orthodox version of "regular clergy", which we, easterners, know under the name "чёрное духовенство", which also was very poor and often illiterate), so the West couldn't be less educated than the East.
>Meeeeeehhhhh, please use something else, it's always the same. It depends from the period and ruler, there was Alexander I and Pavel I, and there was a Catherine II. Difference is noticeable as well.
Actual slavery (крепостничество) —> actual kolchozy (мирская община). And I have to call it "the evolution of the status of russian peasants"? Geg, both were shit, I'll just remind you that Stolypin reforms were performed due to things Stolypin had seen in Western Belarus (Grodno). And under "things" I mean private landowning.
>Plus even when western peasants became "free" they still had no rights, somewhere their conditions were even worse than in Russia lol.
For example? Your peasants were like chinese ones, i.e. literally slaves, not serfs even.
>Google something about english poor laws for example.
Yeah, this. The Americans are smarter than the British so they were doing this out of private initiative by private persons, not with a help of the state by state officials. Or did you mean something other?
>Private property wasn't sacred and still isn't, unfortunately.
Maybe in commies' and nons' minds, surely.
>They literally stole russian assets recently, you know.
Justified.
>If slavs are white then why do we kill other whites (Ukrainians)?
Because 99% of russoids are commies albeit being White but dysgenic and morally degenerate.
>>4095
>>Whatever vends were, they had been germanized.
>Yup, germanized and then slavised, pretty fair I think.
Nee, local mixed germano-slavic population had been eliminated by ((('ed A'my))). They either left their home and emigrate to Western Germany, or were killed.
>Just like Germans were on these lands???
Ancient Poland (in BC period) was inhabited by Germanic tribes. Slavs are a result of balto-germanic (with unmeasured celtic influence) intermixing near Subsylvania aka Podlachia.
>Which planned to dance on the bones of all Russian nation. Not like I'm a fan of commies but I have no pity for Germans after what they did to us(and you btw)
Number of nazis' victims in our country is ≈900k. 700-750k of them — are the holocausted Jews. The other 100-150k it's killed as a result of the war with the partisans (don't forget about soviet partisans' terror towards belarusian volk, especially peasants, because the Reich returned back private landowning). Resuming, there was no genocide or any impactful slavophobic sentiment in the Reich. The Soviets, together with Jews, invented this myth.
>Depends from the period and the place actually, there was a time when Kievan Rus was the most cultured and literate state in Europe(after Byzantium).
It is just unrealistic. Orthodox church had no such a tradition of (relatively) common education as the Roman-Catholics had. The most important difference is that western monks were chronically busy with rewriting books and other intellectual activities (unlike the orthodox version of "regular clergy", which we, easterners, know under the name "чёрное духовенство", which also was very poor and often illiterate), so the West couldn't be less educated than the East.
>Meeeeeehhhhh, please use something else, it's always the same. It depends from the period and ruler, there was Alexander I and Pavel I, and there was a Catherine II. Difference is noticeable as well.
Actual slavery (крепостничество) —> actual kolchozy (мирская община). And I have to call it "the evolution of the status of russian peasants"? Geg, both were shit, I'll just remind you that Stolypin reforms were performed due to things Stolypin had seen in Western Belarus (Grodno). And under "things" I mean private landowning.
>Plus even when western peasants became "free" they still had no rights, somewhere their conditions were even worse than in Russia lol.
For example? Your peasants were like chinese ones, i.e. literally slaves, not serfs even.
>Google something about english poor laws for example.
Yeah, this. The Americans are smarter than the British so they were doing this out of private initiative by private persons, not with a help of the state by state officials. Or did you mean something other?
>Private property wasn't sacred and still isn't, unfortunately.
Maybe in commies' and nons' minds, surely.
>They literally stole russian assets recently, you know.
Justified.
File:
1784479156062.png
(190.32 KB, 512x512, IMG_20240929_010118_185.png)
>>4106
>Yeeeeeeah, Geeeeeerman, of course. Nobility has no ethnicity fella
cope
>I'm not telling that Germans some kind of losers btw, they just weren't based viking ass conquerors-impregnators as you claim them to be.
yet we single handedly ruled central europe ever since weve been here uncontested..? mirin these mental gymnastics. just because you dont rule the entire world with an iron fist doesnt mean ur getting "bullied" LMAO
>Also you are actually slavic
r1a haplogroup dominance has been in eastern germany for thousands of years. literally doesnt mean a thing
>Yeeeeeeah, Geeeeeerman, of course. Nobility has no ethnicity fella
cope
>I'm not telling that Germans some kind of losers btw, they just weren't based viking ass conquerors-impregnators as you claim them to be.
yet we single handedly ruled central europe ever since weve been here uncontested..? mirin these mental gymnastics. just because you dont rule the entire world with an iron fist doesnt mean ur getting "bullied" LMAO
>Also you are actually slavic
r1a haplogroup dominance has been in eastern germany for thousands of years. literally doesnt mean a thing
>>4106
R1a isn't slavic-only haplogroup. Additionally, haplogroups don't matter at all.
R1a isn't slavic-only haplogroup. Additionally, haplogroups don't matter at all.
File:
1784479156062.jpeg
(82.03 KB, 982x2020, 20241008_200330.jpg)
>>4107
i mog u rat. ur turn
i mog u rat. ur turn
File:
1784479156062.png
(269.51 KB, 1700x2000, ClipboardImage.png)
>>4113
Perfect. Btw, why don't you have SS (or whatever its name is) hairstyle? Imo it would fit you (as well as every other White man tbh).
Perfect. Btw, why don't you have SS (or whatever its name is) hairstyle? Imo it would fit you (as well as every other White man tbh).
Post actions
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 350 | Views: 5 | Currently viewing: 1