International Politics
or something
ZWABAG
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 14 | Views: 34 | Currently viewing: 1
File:
1787728379898.gif
(8.2 MB, 396x432, 1787211397994g.gif)
Should Europeans that live in colonies like Australia, Canada and other shit following the principle of remigration in its purest form for ethnic homogeneity move back to their ancestral lands like how European remigrations groups will kick out foreigners to their ancestral lands. Whenever I have argued for remigration people tell me why not I go back as technically speaking Europeans are immigrants to this land. I've even heard arguments that bringing all the Europeans back to their ancestral land will lower the replacement rates of European countries and its a good argument. What do you think?
>image unrelated
>image unrelated
>>21864
Start with yourself as an example. Go back to Blighty or whatever shire you came from
Start with yourself as an example. Go back to Blighty or whatever shire you came from
>>21864
no, continue the work of your ancestors instead of abandoning the world to indians
no, continue the work of your ancestors instead of abandoning the world to indians
You should stop arguing for remigration as a continuous moral principle that should be respected. It's the will of a single group of people that have first settled their land, declared rigid boundaries and established a system of governance. It's the right of the people to chose what foreigners go back. That's it. An example would be Japan's Sakoku. You probably wouldn't be debating with anybody about it if it was already state-enforced. It isn't a "densely packed moral dilemma" that whites just fucking hate eachother disproportionately more than any other race does. Stop responding to "how" and start responding to "when", then maybe we'll get things done.
>>21868
by the way, the original japanese already got replaced by the japanese we know of today. the jomon were hunter gatherers with large beards and didnt have a large population, and the yayoi just expanded with their agriculture and sedentary lifestyle. the ainu are what remains of the jomon doe
that looks like canzuk and the usa more less. the definition of migration has been muddied up so badly, there is a clear difference between large scale migration patterns and acting maliciously against an established civilization (from the inside mind you)
by the way, the original japanese already got replaced by the japanese we know of today. the jomon were hunter gatherers with large beards and didnt have a large population, and the yayoi just expanded with their agriculture and sedentary lifestyle. the ainu are what remains of the jomon doe
that looks like canzuk and the usa more less. the definition of migration has been muddied up so badly, there is a clear difference between large scale migration patterns and acting maliciously against an established civilization (from the inside mind you)
>Whenever I have argued for remigration people tell me why not I go back as technically speaking Europeans are immigrants to this land.
The same people tell you that Europe deserves to be invaded as revenge. There's no underlying principle, they just repeat whatever comeback the jews taught them for the particular situation.
The same people tell you that Europe deserves to be invaded as revenge. There's no underlying principle, they just repeat whatever comeback the jews taught them for the particular situation.
>>21871
>the definition of migration has been muddied up so badly, there is a clear difference between large scale migration patterns and acting maliciously against an established civilization (from the inside mind you)
The age of conquest, adventure, natural settlements into unknown land and discovering new peoples. It's over. It's all geopolitics now. The expanding population of niggers and jeets is a matter of allocation over the whole Earth unfortunately. The only new phenotypes that will be created are mixed race mulattos. A little too blackpilled, i know, but it can change.
>the definition of migration has been muddied up so badly, there is a clear difference between large scale migration patterns and acting maliciously against an established civilization (from the inside mind you)
The age of conquest, adventure, natural settlements into unknown land and discovering new peoples. It's over. It's all geopolitics now. The expanding population of niggers and jeets is a matter of allocation over the whole Earth unfortunately. The only new phenotypes that will be created are mixed race mulattos. A little too blackpilled, i know, but it can change.
>should Europeans go from one pozzed full of immigrants shithole to another pozzed full of immigrants shithole
>>21864
No that's leftist nonsense and this is MAGA country now or something
No that's leftist nonsense and this is MAGA country now or something
>>21864
I mean white people have lived there long enough to be called natives at this point, they've sure as hell done more with the land than any of the other "natives"
I mean white people have lived there long enough to be called natives at this point, they've sure as hell done more with the land than any of the other "natives"
>>21888
You, as a WN yourself, should stop appealing to nativeness as an argument. Nobody cares about that shit lmao. Not that I don't like your conclusions.
You, as a WN yourself, should stop appealing to nativeness as an argument. Nobody cares about that shit lmao. Not that I don't like your conclusions.
Post actions
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 14 | Views: 34 | Currently viewing: 1