International Politics
or something
ZWABAG
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] | Replies: 17 | Views: 9 | Currently viewing: 1
File:
1784482187214.jpeg
(218.72 KB, 928x1104, IMG_20260415_175530_392.jpg)
@zrok is this true?
>>18999
got it
how bad the American right-wing statement is should be, to be controlled by a mixed-race catholic mexican incel?
>>19002
What do you mean by "statement"? Type in Ukrainian because you're seemingly not that fluent in eengleesch to express the thoughts comprehensibly.
What do you mean by "statement"? Type in Ukrainian because you're seemingly not that fluent in eengleesch to express the thoughts comprehensibly.
>>19005
At least Brazil has highly developed white regions, that are part of the southern cone
At least Brazil has highly developed white regions, that are part of the southern cone
>>19011
Even if you accept the logic that America is just English speaking Brazil (it’s not and Brazilian whites wouldn’t even count as “White” on a US census because they are latinx) America still has more highly developed white regions than Brazil.
Even if you accept the logic that America is just English speaking Brazil (it’s not and Brazilian whites wouldn’t even count as “White” on a US census because they are latinx) America still has more highly developed white regions than Brazil.
>>19002
The movement led by the Nigg Fagguentes mongrel-incel is not right-wing anyway (it's not really racist, and catholic, i.e. satanic, yeah :D)
Comparing Brazil to America in turn sounds like insulting the latter tbh
The percentage of whites in the US is 50-60% overall but is already less than 50% among the youngest. White catholics always supported immigration of the Latinx catholix "bros" to America and simply because of that everyone must admit that Catholicism has been a disaster for the Anglo-Protestant civilization in North America.
>>19014
So true, both times we put a catholic in the oval office the things they were most concerned with was immediately opening the borders, and minority rights and equity.
So true, both times we put a catholic in the oval office the things they were most concerned with was immediately opening the borders, and minority rights and equity.
>>19017
Because since the Reformation they didn't like any hint at pluralism in doctrine anymore, so they centralized it and in the end they only left what was "universalist". Though it still happens some of them (the advanced ones) appear to be predeterminists like the Reformed Protestants aka muh calvinists. Tldr: don't make fallible men the authority and don't give up the right to interpret the Bible to an organized group of power-seekers.
Because since the Reformation they didn't like any hint at pluralism in doctrine anymore, so they centralized it and in the end they only left what was "universalist". Though it still happens some of them (the advanced ones) appear to be predeterminists like the Reformed Protestants aka muh calvinists. Tldr: don't make fallible men the authority and don't give up the right to interpret the Bible to an organized group of power-seekers.
Post actions
[Return] [Thread list] [Index] [Catalog] [Top] | Replies: 17 | Views: 9 | Currently viewing: 1