[
Home
/
Overboard
/
Stats
]
[
g
]
[
calm
/
brabant
/
drenthe
/
q
/
qa
/
zellig
]
[
booru
/
wiki
/
club
]
[
v
]
[
Rules
/
Contacts
]
[
Search
]
🔍
[
Register
/
Settings
/
Log in
]
Markup /qa/33993
Comment
It's the FGC-9 (Fuck Gun Control 9mm) (MK2 variant perhaps?). It's a gun concieved by a Kurdish-German called Jstark (RIP) as a form of protest against gun regulations, similarly to Philip Luty. I recommend looking into their views. The gun itself is mostly 3D printed and the few essential metalic parts (such as the spring for the stock, or parts of the trigger) are easy to manufacture or buy. Not that the thing altogether isn't expensive or should you buy the metallic parts in a single place. It has an integrated rail so you can put whatever scope you want on it but it's up to you, since you print it. That's the best part. It's not as prone to jamming as is the Luty is, but it may crack, it's imperative for the testing process to be methodical and correct, and I hope isolated places such as forrests aren't too far or too dangerous to solo test. But a gun is nothing without a bullet, as they say. The projectile itself can be bought online. There's a sort of drill cap or whatever that fits the size of the casing. The casing, right. There's actually no good subsidy for the 9mm casing, so you either have to be extremely good at working with copper (you aren't) or you will have to find them somewhere. I don't know where, and this is why this problem is really giving me a real hoofdpijn. Plus how would you even insert the primer if you were to make them yourself??? As for the powder itself, it's a more possible but dangerous element to obtain and shouldn't be replaced by something easier to get, but more explosive. Or more stable and easy to get, for that matter. Look at Stephan Baillet for example, his gun kept jamming because he used the wrong powder in his bullets during his live fire exercise. If you can find a remidy to these problems, I wish you luck in defending your God given rights of self defense. But honesty i'd choose a easier method of whatever your ends are, at the expense of versatility. It isn't practical for me.