Markup /zellig/112722

Comment
>>112720
Technically speaking, it's possible to call Zoot "a god", I mean, in the same meaning as it's said by the Almighty Himself in Psalsms 82. The explanation is, that, since Adam was a son of God, all his unadulterated descendants are God's sons too. To fully understand what I'm talking about:
>For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church (aka ekklesia): For we are members of His body, of His flesh, and of His bones. (Ephesians 5:29-30)
Who's the "ekklesia" aka the body of Christ?
>Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. (Galatians 3:16).
Thus, namely Abraham's seed is Christ's body. But who relates to that seed?
>When the most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when He separated the sons of Adam, He set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel. For the Lord's portion is His people; Jacob is the lot of His inheritance.
Let's remember, Zoot is BulgARYAN, i.e. he's white, and therefore it makes him God's son (through Adam and Eve) and a member of Christ's body. So, yes, the copypasta poster was technically right on this account. 
<religious schizobabbling on the Zarty is alive again