Markup /zellig/79047

Comment
>It is just so obviously infantization fetish and fat fetish art work. Like, listen, you don't have to believe me, and if you don't see it then I can't prove it to you. I am just guaranteeing you that no one ever draws this unless it is a fetish. Like I would probably willingly bet a thousand dollars on it if there was a way to find out for sure.
<REDDIT SPACE
>Drawing grown characters as infants is already strange, and the cartoon giant eyes, crying, and baby talk make it worse. You have to wonder: what sort of person would choose to spend their time on this art? 100% either someone with an infant fetish or some age-regressor which is adjacent.
<REDDIT SPACE
>On the other hand the character doesn't have baby proportions but is so strangely large and round to the point that it isn't really even cute which is supposed to be the innocent reason for drawing infants. I can't see any other motivation other than fat fetishization.
<REDDIT SPACE
>Like when you see stuff like this you have to remember that an artist doesn't have to draw anything unless they want to. And what kind of person takes a thin teenage character and decides they want to draw them as an unrealistically obese infant crying and doing baby stuff? Do you think that just any artist out there would draw this image specifically? And if not, then what is different about the artists who would.
<REDDIT SPACE
>What could drive someone to purposely draw fat infant versions of non-fat non-infant characters?
<REDDIT SPACE
>Really, mark my words, all of this is either a fetish, or unhealthy fixation, or both or half of each. It is really extremely weird and your average artist would not draw this. There is something inherently unhealthy and even maybe dangerous here.
<REDDIT SPACE
>Does that make sense? Or is there really another way to view all of this that I am not seeing?