Markup /zellig/50235

Comment
>Do you have a source on that?
>Source?
>A source. I need a source.
>Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
>No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
>You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
>You don't have a source from Studio Massa that says exactly what you are saying?
>Then your arguments are invalid.
>No, it doesn't matter how close the message of the show is to your point. Correlation does not equal truth.
>Correlation does not equal truth.
>CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. TRUTH.
>You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
>Nope, still haven't.
>I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a chud. A moron.