Markup /qa/27396

Comment
>>27390
>the part of the group of numale content obsession with the likes of Star Wars, Marvel, and Nintendo
no it's not? are you saying that because it's a weird fetish? by fetish standards it's extremely mainstream and every normie knows about it.
>>27393
the reason people made spade edits of soyjaks is because soyjaks are ugly, gross men as oppose to the conventionally attractive whores you see in porn. when you make spade edits of characters with cutesy, idealistic designs (such as the ones in Ongezellig) you aren't subverting anything, you're just making fetish content.
>>27394
a lot of the people who make these "jokes" are genuine fetishists hiding under the guise of comedic license. imagine if people started drawing the girls in used diapers and other abdl scenarios, and whenever they got pressed for it they'd say "it's just a joke dude, i'm totally not actually into that stuff". would anyone actually believe that?