[
Home
/
Overboard
/
Stats
]
[
g
]
[
calm
/
brabant
/
drenthe
/
q
/
qa
/
zellig
]
[
booru
/
wiki
]
[
v
]
[
Rules
/
Contacts
]
[
Search
]
🔍
[
Register
/
Settings
/
Log in
]
Markup /q/5025
Comment
>>5022 >If we're going by Dutch standard Thank God we are not. >Generally, you don't want semicolons in lists Actually, it's the correct way to end elements of a list and is required if you were ever to publish an article, but I've found Australian government's style manual that says they shouldn't be used because they confuse their citizens, so I will remove them for the sake of all Australians on here. >Cut "too" in the first point or change it to "this includes posts without attachments". It's not needed at all because of "content" in the sentence above, I will simply remove it. >The second point should be "mild drawn gore is allowed". Yep, less words is better. >There's ambiguity here. We are obviously not associated with frootcord websites, If someone comes to such conclusion, that's not my problem. >"content which does not belong on other boards" is better. True. >This conflict's with /brabant/'s presentation. The description is in conflict with its actual purpose. I've never seen a non-political thread moved out of /brabant/. >This is an ESLerald It's not, but I agree it can be phrased better. >Your examples of it are split between promotion and engagement. That's because it doesn't matter if someone engages in an activity or "merely" promotes it. It's the same thing. >Your current sole example is sexual deviancy, but I've seen bans for Satanism, which I think falls under this rule and could be an example. It does, but it's pointless to try to enumerate every single case of degeneracy, there are simply way too many of them. >This should include a clause for clarity regarding VPNs. What's not clear about VPNs? >"Doxxing" should be defined with the legal definitions of the US and country of the server hoster. It does not, I know it when I see it, also afaik there is no agreement between american states as for what constitutes doxxing and whether it's legal or not. >"Illegal content" should be defined as that which would violate US federal law and that of the country of the server hoster. It should be reworded to "no content forbidden by the rules of hosting provider" because of the reasons above. >No outside drama It should be removed, I have no idea why Zoot created it honestly, but I think Rule 3 already covers all the cases it was supposed to cover.
