Markup /q/1165

Comment
>>1155
>>1158
Palpable cope
It's counter productive to Theosis, it alienates you from God. Sex was given to man for the purpose of reproduction, just as food was given to him for the purpose of giving him energy, but both can be sinful if misused/overindulged in: Lust and gluttony.
<
Consider the fact that the renewed earth won't have any of these cardinal pleasures of sex, consider the monastics who abstain from sexual acts for decades, how can you in face of all this call it something necessary? Peter himself said: "It is good for [unmarried and widows] to stay unmarried, as I do. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion." It's clear sexual immorality is a serious topic and I don't see how you can classify pornography as better than premarital sex. It's a misuse of an otherwise beautiful gift to man.
<
Lastly I urge you to look at the surrounding discourse. It isn't called the iconography of the devil for nothing. Both the Roman Catholic and The Orthodox Churches condemn pornography, and so do almost all protestant. And the people pushing pornography as normal are bugmen, jews, satanists and all the worst shmucks you can think of. Truly, reality is so clear you hardly even need to think about what is good and not, God made it beyond evident. Stop coming up with excuses, all were born with inherit knowing of good and evil and I know you realize pornography can't be good or beautiful.