Question & Answer

Do you guys think autism is real? I have given it some thought and do not think so. In syllogistic form, these are my reasons:

1. Either autism does or does not exist.
2. If autism has real existence (exists outside of the mind), then it must have an essence or definition.
3. But it would seem that autism has no essence. Whenever people try to define it, they only bring up its symptoms or what kind of a condition it is—not what it is in itself.
4. Now, either autism can or cannot be defined.
5. If it can be defined, it has an essence (in which case it also has real existence).
6. Either this essence is simple (not made of parts) or composite (made of parts).
7. If the essence of autism is simple, it can be discovered in the same way we discover other essences—by thinking deeply about it.
8. But no one has discovered its essence since its introduction to psychology in the early 20th century.
9. So, for the last hundred years, we have remained bereft of any reason to believe it has real existence.
10. If we have lacked any reason to believe it ever existed, it follows that we have no reason to believe it exists here aud now.
11. If the essence of autism hasn't been discovered yet (as some may argue), they must do more than assert that it exists; they must prove that it exists by providing it. Otherwise, we remain bereft of any reason to believe it exists.
12. Now, either autism exists as a spectrum or it exists as a condition. If everyone has it in degrees, then it cannot be said to be a neurological condition any more than someone can be said to be "a little pregnant." You either have it or you do not.
13. Besides, a condition implies a certain state or mode of being in a subject.
14. But if autism is a spectrum and not a condition, then autism is just whatever deviates from the norm—a kind of tendency or set of behaviorisms.
15. If autism is whatever deviates from the norm, then it is really no different than eccentricity, in which case "autism" is merely eccentricity.
16. If, on the other hand, autism exists as a condition, we must be able to say what exactly it entails.
17. Now, maladies like mental conditions are privations; that is to say, rather than existing as features, they exist as a certain lack of features or due perfections.
18. So, to define what autism as a condition is, we must define what due perfections are lacking in its subjects.
19. Now, scientists tell us that the most common symptoms of autism are three: (1) difficulties in socialization or introversion, (2) repetitive behaviors and hyperfixations, and (3) sensory sensitivities.
20. If the essence of autism is lack of social skills, then autism is not a mental condition but a lack of experience.
21. If autism is social retardation, then it is merely social retardation; not autism as generally understood.
22. If the essence of autism is a kind of temperament (ie., introversion), then it is not a mental condition but a behaviorism.
23. If the essence of autism is a set of behaviors (i.e., obsession with trains or chicken nuggets), then, again, it is not a mental condition.
24. If the essence of autism is a sensory or textile sensitivity, then it is a sensory or textile sensitivity; not autism as generally understood.
25. If autism is not a condition but a collection of interrelated symptoms like these, then someone who overcomes these symptoms ceases to be autistic.
26. Now, some may argue that autism is this very interrelation, but merely being interrelated is not enough to establish it as a true condition. Neurological and behavioral patterns often coincide given the complexity of the brain. Thus, a schizophrenic may be both socially retarded because of his hallucinations and antisocial.
27. If, on the other hand, it exists as a collection of these individual symptoms, then the essence of autism is composite.
28. Since singular objects can only have singular identities or essences, that autism has multiple distinct essences means that it can only exist virtually (in the mind) as a useful but ultimately illusory mental category.
29. If it happens that the essence of autism cannot be defined, either it is too difficult for us to define because we lack wisdom or it is impossible for anyone to define.
30. If autism is so difficult to define that not even scientists can tell us what it is, they have no business going around diagnosing people with it.
31. If, on the other hand, it is impossible to define, then it is impossible that we should have any reason to believe it exists.
32. So, whether or not we can define it, we remain bereft of any reason to believe that autism exists.

>let's ban frogs they fuggen jerdee

KEK DO NUSOIFAGGOTS REALLY?

Several years ago, I stumbled upon an exceptionally beautiful yet little-known art series titled Canterlot Royal Ballet Academy. While ostensibly a fan work of My Little Pony, its uniqueness struck me as so profound that it felt almost entirely original - save for the character names. As the title suggests, the story follows the lives of anthropomorphic ponies attending a ballet academy.

I can't quite pinpoint why, but this work radiates a surreal, otherworldly aura - a uniquely captivating atmosphere unlike anything I'd encountered before. That first encounter left me immersed in its surreal experience for an entire day. When I stumbled upon it late at night, it felt eerie at first, but that sense of dissonance quickly dissolved into pure admiration. I fell into a beautiful trance, utterly captivated. I experienced an indescribable surreal, ethereal sensory journey, while also catching whiffs of a sweet, phantom scent.

The next morning, I thought it had been nothing but a dream, yet I was delighted to discover it was all real. Throughout the rest of that day, the sensation intensified, leaving me in a perpetual state of waking reverie, only ending when dusk eventually washed it away. Strangest of all, once that feeling faded, I could recall nothing of the day's events - only that serene, eternal sense of serendipitous bliss remained.

Whenever I gaze upon it, a peculiar feeling arises - as if it were something that shouldn't exist in reality, something unimaginable. Like a fragment of some magical dream miraculously transplanted into reality. Without any backstory, I could fully envision the entire series as if it truly existed. This wasn't a story I'd invented; it felt as though the sensation itself contained an inherent narrative thread. I can vividly picture the dreamlike fragmentation, imbued with a fleeting innocence. I can even precisely imagine how each character's voice should sound - those otherworldly tones seem to transcend time and space, originating nowhere in particular yet carrying an intensely intimate quality.

My fascination with CRBA has never waned over the years. I scoured the internet for every trace of it, only to discover how remarkably obscure it remains - a fact that deeply disappoints me. It seems everyone who encounters it finds it utterly brilliant, yet for some reason it never gains the recognition it deserves. AVCHonline's artistic evolution has been equally astonishing. Within just a few short years, he's leaped from rough cartoon sketches to the pinnacle of the CRBA series, yet even his earlier works have garnered more attention than his later creations.

I've made it my mission to make people find out about it and (hopefully) experience the same awe that I felt. So I've created a website to catalog all of the artwork in one place (and in the highest quality). Prior to this, it was scattered in many places across the internet, much of it only available in low resolution.

I've also created an imageboard for it.

The main site is here: https://crba.dedyn.io
The imageboard is here: https://ib.crba.dedyn.io

For an introduction to CRBA, I recommend starting with the AcademyLIVE sub-series: https://crba.dedyn.io/?id=181
For the absolute peak of it (all of CRBA is amazing, but I think this one in particular is probably the most detailed and stunning): https://crba.dedyn.io/?id=88

I also recommend checking out his music and animations for the CRBA series here: https://crba.dedyn.io/video

Sure I've seen odessanbvll's message a few days ago about social media, but I had this thought for a while.
'tok is out of question, it has no redeeming value and is the main propagator of nigger and faggot (and niggerfaggot) culture.

Pros:
-gemmy edits
-not much censorship I assume
-useful videos (they all say that but actually less than 0.0001% of it is absorbed by the mind for application irl

Cons:
-my brain will turn into a mush
-time waste
-may deepen digital addiction
-I may or may not be influenced by the zog machine (as if GoyTube wasn't enough)
-made by kikes to subvert the goyim, this is all social media's primary purpose - commercial value and political propaganda
-I will get datamined even more

What do you think zaryans?