[ home ] [ q / qa / zellig / brabant / drenthe ] [ overboard ] [ v ] [ archive / telegram / zelligwiki / club / booru ] [ execution list / pph ] [ Rules / Contacts ] [] [ log in ]

/brabant/ - International Politics

or something
Name
Options
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

ZWABAG

File: 1735473133723.jpg (220.07 KB, 1920x1080, Sisa!!!.jpg)

 No.6809

Recently I decided to delve into the history of European nations, in particular their origins, in order to create a well grounded hierarchy between them (or, to be more precise, to justify the already visible hierarchy). It would seem that the first thing that's obvious is the superiority of the Northern Europe over the Southern. There could be no problems with this, since the North and South are distinguished by different dominant components, the steppe Aryan and the farmer Mediterranean. Be that as it may, everything is constantly changing, and throughout history Europe has undergone many changes, the main one being the replacement of the North-South dichotomy with West-East. More precisely, the emergence of the last, since the first hasn't disappeared anywhere, but remains.
It's known that North-Western Europe and the origin associated with it presupposes a higher intelligence. Thus, the first division of Europe should be the following — North and South. First, let's deal with the South. Here everything is very simple — the white population of the Western Mediterranean contains fewer non-White (and more basically Mediterranean) components in themselves than their eastern relatives from, let's say, mainland Greece.
Now that everything about Southern Europe is known, it would be worth moving on to Northern Europe. Here, everything becomes much more complicated in understanding racial reality.
As I have already noted, it's namely the North-Western Europeans who intellectually come to the forefront of their race, while North-Eastern Europe and the origins associated with it lag behind in their cognitive abilities of the brain (although they're still higher than Southern Europe, but nonetheless). The first thing, we could connect this with, is the (genetic) location of the Celto-Germanics of North-Western Europe in the "ideal center" between the three main White genetic components of the Paleolithic, Neolithic, and the Pontic steppe. However, such an "ideal and balanced combination", even coupled with the absence of non-White admixtures (with the exception, perhaps, of the Boer-Afrikaners, although it's not quite correct to bring them as an example), couldn't explain this difference. To understand the context of the situation, I'll simply clarify that Asiatic and Saami-like admixtures are relatively widespread among Eastern Europeans (in particular, Balto-Slavics), but not only does any significant percentage of them come from the Finno-Ugrics (and most Russians, too, "I wonder why"), but these admixtures may not be detected individually at all .
Turning back to the source on which the passage about the intellectual superiority of the "North-Western brain" was based, it's worth paying attention to the connection of these data with what anthropology provides us, which was also discussed in the already mentioned article [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171282/, fig. 2 & 3 respectively]. Namely, I mean the similarity of the skulls and external appearance of the population of the North-Western square of Europe with the skulls and external appearance of the representatives of the Corded Ware (CWC). Measurements of the steppe herders of the East-European Plain show that their height, skull and physique were quite mature and robust. In particular, their skulls were absolutely enormous, as was their height, but it's important to note that these indicators were also observed in the CWC people, who already had dolichocephalic and, apparently, leptorrhine heads, due to the large absolute values of the skull ("Another combination of features, almost never encountered in the Neolithic materials, is characteristic of most of the Corded Ware samples located at the very bottom of the graph (f): very long, narrow, dolichocranic, high skulls" - "О краниологических признаках западных миграций в Восточную Европу в эпоху Бронзы", 2024). We can observe the same picture in Northwestern Europe (what are the Dutch alone worth, if not the Swedes).
But these are only external signs. Speaking of genetics, it would be fair to say, that the Slavics have as many Northern-European and in particular purely Steppe traces in their blood as their Celto-Germanic relatives, if not a little more (!). However, despite this, try to look at the distances of the representatives of the CWC with the Northerners of the Centum (Celto-Germanicsl and (Balto-Slavics) Satem groups, and you'll find that the Germans are the closest racial group similar to them, and this can be traced both from the western borders of the culture and right up to its easternmost outskirts (Sintashta). Apparently, WHG and ANF admixtures in the Germans could compensate for each other, aligning their coordinates with the Aryan tribes of the Early Bronze Age. This could fit very well with the idea that White nations of northwestern origin are the most successful of the Europeans due to the "perfect balance", but let's be honest, this is a very dumb assumption. Nevertheless, the fact remains that the Germanica are the closest peoples to the ancient populations that once spread the Indo-European languages throughout Eurasia, which is an advantage for them.
Returning to the topic of the phenotype, I would like to mention one interesting detail - the Germanics and North-Western (and simply Western) Europeans are generally lighter than the Slavics and Eastern Europeans as such. This could put us on the right track in the regard of where the main difference between the Slavics and the Germanics could be traced. And the difference is eugenic, but so old and inherent in today's European nations, that it's already hereditary. In general, already discussing the current issue with a ukrainian acquaintance, he also supported the opinion about the "qualitative" difference between the Northern European folks. Delving into the subject of how the traits of light hair and eye pigmentation spread across Europe, it's worth starting with the fact that all ancient White populations were inclined to light hair and eyes. However, these were only tendencies, and the mentioned traits were quite rare. But still, why is it so important to be blond?

 No.6810

The origins of the present-day european light hair and eyes must be sought in the Globular Amphora culture (GAC), which in racial categories was 70% Mediterranean (ANF) and 30% Paleo-European (WHG). It was the last 30% that caused episodes of blondism and blue eyes in the population, and their further spread among representatives of that culture was due to sexual selection, which clearly tells us not only about the advantage of light hair, but also that the Neolithic admixture found in modern Europeans, associated with the GAC, is more valuable and "higher" than other related cultures of Neolithic Europe. With the arrival of CWC, which subsequently absorbed this culture, the Indo-Europeans received and preserved these light features, further spreading them as they conquered, as can be seen in the example of the Indo-Iranian tribes. So, it turns out, that we have found some pattern, that Eastern Europeans are "eugenically worse" than Western ones, and that some farmers were "qualitatively better" than others. So, it also turns out that one of the sources of differences between the Balto-Slavs of the North-East and the Celto-Germans of the North-West is a possible difference in the admixture of Neolithic populations in their genome? Yes, we come to approximately this conclusion, studying the development of Indo-European cultures in Europe, be it the Bell Beakers or the Unetice culture (all genetically close to modern Germanics, although in fact they are the ancestors of the following Celtics and Italics), because they are somehow connected with the western part of the CWC, where interbreeding with farmers was quite widespread (and the main farmer population, increasingly encountered further west of the known culture, were the Globular Amphora). Genetic data confirm our thoughts — the Celto-Germanic peoples of the North-West are mostly descended from Neolithic groups associated with the globular amphora, while the Balto-Slavic North-East is almost not related to it (apparently, having received most of their fair features through a specifically Indo-European source). Thus, the hypothesis is confirmed, that, even having an equal number (or even more) of Northern European components (including local HG populations*), NEEs are inferior to NWEs in the quality of Neolithic components, which explains the superiority of the last over the first.
Summarizing, we come to the following conclusion about the hierarchy of European ethnic groups:
1. a. Germanics.
b. Celtics (including French).
2. a. Baltics.
b. Slavics (Eastern, Western) and also nations of Central Europe (Hungarians, Slovenes, Croats).
3. a. Western Mediterraneans (Spaniards, Italians, Portuguese).
b. Balkans (Romanians (?), Albanians, Greeks, Serbs).

And remember what Lapouge had said: the taller the height, the larger the head, the more developed the skull on all sides, especially with light pigmentation - the higher the position and status.
*Understanding this fact also explains why most EHGs have some Mongoloid features, while the Yamnaya and other IE have none at all: they, like the Tarim mummies, come from the branch of ANE-related genetics that didn't receive an infusion of East Asian populations, but received a little Basal. Which is actually logical, considering the remoteness of East Asia from the PIE "Urheimat".

 No.6813

>>6810
Eastern Slavs should be below balkan folk

 No.6815

>>6809
Why Hungarians in particular up there? The average Hungarian has more common features with the Mongoloid-Turk population than Croats for example. This would by proxy place the Turkish population up there too, a bit of an oversight

 No.6816

>>6813
I didn't count modern russians as slavs though, they are presently the exception.

 No.6817

>>6815
Hungarians are basically ugric-speaking slovaks ngl (evendoe generically speaking)

 No.6818

>>6815
Racial science is as objective as gender studies. Belarussisy is the same as libcucks he hates who are science worshippers

 No.6820

>>6816
Im talking about everything east of Bug river/Carpathian moutains, in my region alot of these east slavic migrants live and I have to say that they behave more similar to Chechen subhumans than to European native population

 No.6821

File: 1735476213425.png (108.94 KB, 512x366, file_148294447.png)

>Racial science is as objective as gender studies because it's just offensive to our commie subhuman nation and blya

 No.6822

File: 1735476628174.png (510.98 KB, 1049x888, ClipboardImage.png)

>Russians are subhuman commies because they ended jewish world order after WW2 and I trust only in kiked western propaganda and science

 No.6823

>>6820
All bcs they are bolschewized. Do you hear what language they speak? "The Pushkin's language". The true Ukrainians are fighting against the neosoviet horde, and the malorussians don't give a fuck about anything like this and everything that's above their miserious consumer problems (also some chuds often call this homo economicus/homo sovieticus lifestyle as "materialistic", but it could confuse us, so I don't use it). Their creed is simply "What's the difference?". Those nihilistic victims of negative soviet selection have no right to be called real Belarusians/Ukrainians. The real ones live abroad, emigrated from postsoviet melting pot before 2000s. And, you know, I was talking about the genetics and the racial, inherent differences. But those characteristics that I gave to the russian-speaking noviop riffraff are neither racial nor inherent, it's nothing but the globhomo social experiment, whose purpose is simply to find out how much a White European can be brutalized to the level of a Chinese. You know that these are, essentially, the "environmental factors" — they are responsible for 20% of a person. So, if using these 20%, we get such a terrible and striking result, then think about how much influence the other 80% has, which blood (genetics) is responsible for.

 No.6824

>>6822
>Russians ended Jewish world order by establishing a Jewish ideology
<inb4 I replied to bait

 No.6825

>>6820
>they behave more similar to Chechen subhumans than to European native population
Exactly. If they weren't unconscious anti-white socialists, they wouldn't behave like that.

 No.6826

>>6824
This.

 No.6827

>>6823
"real ones live abroad" So if those subhumans who I met, who behave like niggers and constantly chimp out, get drunk and do crime, are the best inviduals from your race what does it say about rest of east slavic folk

 No.6828

>>6817
Hungarians, Finnics and Turks all have common roots, but the Finnish people are quite different from Turks or even Hungarians. I wouldn't place any Mongoloid population higher than the Balkanic people, which are direct descendants of the Indo-European populations which settled there (Serbs have more in common with Slavs for example but are placed a position below ????). The list is obviously wrong and must be reviewed

 No.6829

>>6827
You just misunderstood me. I've said "abroad" refering to the national diaspora, not to recent refugees (namely them I called "the malorussians"). I didn't expect it would be so difficult to get me without additional questions.

 No.6830

>>6824
>Jewish ideology replaced jewish ideologues with Russian nationalists

 No.6832

>Hungarians, Finnics and Turks all have common roots, but the Finnish people are quite different from Turks or even Hungarians.
Only linguistically. I define the race by blood, not by language.
>I wouldn't place any Mongoloid population higher than the Balkanic people, which are direct descendants of the Indo-European populations which settled there
No, they are mostly ANF pre-IE neolithic farmers. But, surely, they also have some IE and even paleolithic admixtures.
>Serbs have more in common with Slavs for example but are placed a position below ????)
Nothing surprising, though. I was rating them by racial quality, I can find their genetic breakdown or make it myself specially for you if you don't believe.
>The list is obviously wrong and must be reviewed
As if you didn't notice the correlation between the NWE ancestry and intelligence huh.
>>6830
Don't pay any attention to this wigger, it's not worth it

 No.6833

>>6829
They behave in exact same way, as proof just watch polish movies from early 2000s like "U Pana Boga za Piecem" they also show east slavs doing all the crime. Chimping out is just part of their blood, they do stupid shit, get deported and then cry that we are "racist" to them for no reason. Muh slavic brotherhood

 No.6834

>>6833
You're recommending me a film about what do soviet disgenic apes usually do but I don't care about that since I know the asiatified barbarians remain barbarians without any external force but idk lurk mkar about our diasporas, such as, foer example, the Canadian ones (https://uk.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%97%D0%BD%D1%86%D1%96_%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8 and https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belarusian_Canadians), and you'll see a lot of sterling and honorable people, and it's not surprising, due to that fact their ancestors fled the corrupting influence of the Soviet Union (or even immigrated before that evil empire came into being). Don't pretend not to understand that the Stoddard's "undermen" will bear the weight of civilization on them.
>"Meanwhile, the Wehrmacht had penetrated several kilometers to the east and taken many prisoners. Here is a small selection of particularly frightening types of these Bolshevik untermenschen who, on Stalin's orders, were to flood all of Europe and strangle order, prosperity and culture in fire and blood."

 No.6835

File: 1735479368258.jpg (141.12 KB, 862x1024, IMG_20241202_192856_148.jpg)

>>6833
>Muh slavic brotherhood
You know this sentence has an image

 No.6836

Impressive, very nice. Now let's see the Fₛₜ distance tables.

 No.6837

>>6835
Bulgarians are closer to Spaniards than Russians btw.

 No.6838

>>6836
It refers to my statement about Germanics' distances to ancient populations like the CWC, right?
>>6837
To greeks. The spaniards represent a different cluster.

 No.6839

>>6838
They are closer to Greeks than to Russians too. Those two sentences don't contradict each other.

 No.6840

File: 1735479830827.jpg (62.41 KB, 636x1000, 51IB42g11sL._AC_UF1000,100….jpg)

>>6838
I mean that in general. This is mostly a solved problem.

 No.6841

>>6839
The map of Lazaridis shows me that the distances from bulgarians to spaniards and from bulgarians to germans are the same tbf.

 No.6843

>>6840
>Evendoe I don't know the plot of the book
Explain the point in nutshell, sir.

 No.6845

>>6843
You can just measure the genetic distances between ethnic groups and translate it into kinship equivalent. Genetic interest in preserving one's ethnic group is based on the fact that more closely related people have more common genes. No need for that skull measuring BS.

 No.6848

>>6845
>You can just measure the genetic distances between ethnic groups and translate it into kinship equivalent.
Ofc, I know what Fst is.
>No need for that skull measuring BS.
But I combined anthropology and genetics. I paid even more attention to the second one. I think you had to read my wordswordswords in full not in part.

 No.8294

Interesting thread, go up

 No.8295

File: 1741003188096.jpg (38.98 KB, 640x640, IMG_20250224_004424_766.jpg)

>>8294
I changed my opinion, or rather, the basis on which we could evaluate the quality of the european subraces(ethnicities). It was such a failure to make calculations using not Iron but Bronze Age populations. It's desirable that the original post be perceived as shitpost.

 No.8296

>>8295
Another belaruscuck fail

 No.8297

>>6837
spaniards? was it revealed to you in a dream or smth?

 No.8298

>>8297
zoot discovering /brabant/ lore

 No.8299

>>8298
Only the most obsessed of Zaryans end up here

 No.8305

>>8298
i am an innocent bystander

 No.8309

>>8297
>>8298
Zoot is right tho

 No.8310

File: 1741034750866.png (80.71 KB, 775x258, Screenshot 2025-03-03 at 2….png)

>>8309
He didn't say anything doe
>>8299
Imagine being obsessed enough to be able to explain this exact flag-picrel-caption combination going back to pre-/zate/ era.

 No.8311


 No.8312

>>8310
I have seen this thread

 No.8316

File: 1741051515407.png (712.42 KB, 1144x793, 148956774692.png)

>>6809
stupid low IQ mongrel zigger trying to cope with his irrelevant potato farming mudhutt dwelling existence

 No.8321

File: 1741112890095.jpg (87.05 KB, 1014x1280, IMG_20240501_235511_810.jpg)

>>8316
>intolerant to lactose, can't consume dairy

 No.8322

>>8311
it was revealed to me in an embedded catbox link btw

 No.8323

>>8321
I'm white and I can drink milk

 No.8324

File: 1741140009062.png (48.74 KB, 183x183, FAC59F47-82F1-4FAA-BB84-A0….png)

Eurapean race, i gona win first place ??



[Return][Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home ] [ q / qa / zellig / brabant / drenthe ] [ overboard ] [ v ] [ archive / telegram / zelligwiki / club / booru ] [ execution list / pph ] [ Rules / Contacts ] [] [ log in ]